corporate whore
oh, thought you were dead
Agree with Mr BC - I take Thameslink daily and when it's good it's great - when it's bad it's soul destroying.
The trouble comes because Thameslink don't run any of the stations south of Blackfriars - even LJ AFAIK, which no other company services (privatisation, don'tchajustluvit?). Thus, if delays occur, staff are under no obligation to dish out information. The electronic boards are extremely unreliable.
I don't 'get' Thameslink 2000. Why try and push through the new stuff over Borough Market - with all the hassle and anger and cost that entails - when there's absolutely no need for Thameslink to run a fast service from London Bridge to East Croydon? That route's well provided for out of London Bridge/Charing Cross.
They should just put more trains to East Croydon and beyond via LJ/Herne Hill/Tulse Hill. This would ease some of the London Bridge bottleneck, provide better, more regular links through LJ and HH - why not 8 trains an hour instead of 4? There's no other traffic on those lines...
The trouble comes because Thameslink don't run any of the stations south of Blackfriars - even LJ AFAIK, which no other company services (privatisation, don'tchajustluvit?). Thus, if delays occur, staff are under no obligation to dish out information. The electronic boards are extremely unreliable.
I don't 'get' Thameslink 2000. Why try and push through the new stuff over Borough Market - with all the hassle and anger and cost that entails - when there's absolutely no need for Thameslink to run a fast service from London Bridge to East Croydon? That route's well provided for out of London Bridge/Charing Cross.
They should just put more trains to East Croydon and beyond via LJ/Herne Hill/Tulse Hill. This would ease some of the London Bridge bottleneck, provide better, more regular links through LJ and HH - why not 8 trains an hour instead of 4? There's no other traffic on those lines...