Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Fargo (TV series)

So, so good. A drama is made or unmade by its final episode. Not just whether all the strands are tied up, but also does it mean anything? What is the overarching theme — does the author have anything they are trying to say? And that’s rare these days. Mostly stuff just happens then it stops happening.

Fargo has always been about the superiority of simple, everyday life and basic love over the lure of grandiosity, excitement, money and violence. The original film, for example, focussed on the contrast between the pregnant cop’s fulfilling marriage versus the ultimately empty actions of the kidnappers. But this last series really pitched that narrative to perfection. What would have been the denouement in a lesser drama — the shoot-out at the ranch — was just the precursor to the real ending of the story it wanted to tell. The message of the joy of a simple life lived with others, and that forgiveness beats any amount of revenge and debt. And didn’t they pull that off beautifully? The final scene meant everything because of all the violence and bitterness that the previous 9.75 episodes had created. Wonderful.

Special mention to the acting of Munch and Dorothy/Nadine. Those two on screen together was always just breathtaking.
 
So, so good. A drama is made or unmade by its final episode. Not just whether all the strands are tied up, but also does it mean anything? What is the overarching theme — does the author have anything they are trying to say? And that’s rare these days. Mostly stuff just happens then it stops happening.

Fargo has always been about the superiority of simple, everyday life and basic love over the lure of grandiosity, excitement, money and violence. The original film, for example, focussed on the contrast between the pregnant cop’s fulfilling marriage versus the ultimately empty actions of the kidnappers. But this last series really pitched that narrative to perfection. What would have been the denouement in a lesser drama — the shoot-out at the ranch — was just the precursor to the real ending of the story it wanted to tell. The message of the joy of a simple life lived with others, and that forgiveness beats any amount of revenge and debt. And didn’t they pull that off beautifully? The final scene meant everything because of all the violence and bitterness that the previous 9.75 episodes had created. Wonderful.

Special mention to the acting of Munch and Dorothy/Nadine. Those two on screen together was always just breathtaking.
Yes, but also: The epigraph at the beginning of the series was about Minnesota Nice. Was this scene also the triumph off passive aggressive Minnesota Niceness over the unholy might of an immortal warrior?
 
Yes, but also: The epigraph at the beginning of the series was about Minnesota Nice. Was this scene also the triumph off passive aggressive Minnesota Niceness over the unholy might of an immortal warrior?
Yeah, it was a tie up to that. I don't know if it was passive aggressive though. She just overrode it with niceness, and that was really all he ever wanted.

Incidentally I have also just started watching Ted Lasso and when I realised why she looked familiar. Well. She's a good actor! :D
 
I wasn't so keen on the bit where mother in law arranges for him to suffer in prison. Clearly debt was a theme and he's supposedly paying in kind but nonetheless.
 
I wasn't so keen on the bit where mother in law arranges for him to suffer in prison. Clearly debt was a theme and he's supposedly paying in kind but nonetheless.
I thought that initially but then, it makes sense if you see the whole thing as an exploration of worldviews related to debt and obligations. Lorraine is the embodiment of the unforgiving creditor, and she embodies that until the end. In many ways, little else separates Lorraine from Dot, who epitomises understanding and forgiveness. They are very similar characters but for that aspect. But that difference is crucial. Who is the better off spiritually of these two, in spite of Lorraine’s wealth and power? Who is happier?
 
Last edited:
Yes, but also: The epigraph at the beginning of the series was about Minnesota Nice. Was this scene also the triumph off passive aggressive Minnesota Niceness over the unholy might of an immortal warrior?

I'd say it was an argument for genuine kindness over superficial 'niceness'. We'd seen Dot's ferocity, ingenuity, tenacity. We'd also seen her go through the motions of pretending everything was fine even when it was falling apart. But where the story ends is with her showing real kindness and charity. That is what finally brings the cycle of cruelty and greed to an end.
 
At the end of season 2, Kirsten Dunst is still trying to do 'Minnesota nice' in a doomed attempt to fend off the realisation of what has happened. At the end of this one there were no delusions, nothing fake left standing. Tillman's delusions of his own power finally fall away before our eyes. Dot acknowledges that her reunion with Linda had only ever been a dream.

In the final scene Scotty looks at the strange visitor with nothing but trust in her eyes, not because she's stupid or naive but because she can see that there's a good man in there somewhere. And she can see that because she's been raised by kind and decent people. She's been through a lot of shit by this point but she trusts Munch, and trusts her mother to deal with whatever happens. That faith is not only justified, it allows Munch's redemption to happen.
 
At the end of season 2, Kirsten Dunst is still trying to do 'Minnesota nice' in a doomed attempt to fend off the realisation of what has happened. At the end of this one there were no delusions, nothing fake left standing. Tillman's delusions of his own power finally fall away before our eyes. Dot acknowledges that her reunion with Linda had only ever been a dream.

In the final scene Scotty looks at the strange visitor with nothing but trust in her eyes, not because she's stupid or naive but because she can see that there's a good man in there somewhere. And she can see that because she's been raised by kind and decent people. She's been through a lot of shit by this point but she trusts Munch, and trusts her mother to deal with whatever happens. That faith is not only justified, it allows Munch's redemption to happen.
And Wayne. Let’s not forget him. The man who came through his experiences unchanged in terms of trust and goodwill. His mother squeezes debtors but he gives them brand new cars for free. The opposite counterpart to Roy. He never questions Munch’s presence, just gives him a bottle of pop.
 
As usual, the Voltz household is fashionably late to this series. Starting off with a (small c) conservative, single episode on the first night. A general inability to locate anything we both wanted to watch led to a two episode binge last night. So far it seems to be working for both of us
 
Was Munch's life story deliberately inconsistent?

He was supposed to have come from Wales but claimed never to have seen a mountain until he got to North America. When he ate the sun it was the 1500s but then he said he crossed the Atlantic in a longboat.
 
Very good first couple of episodes. As the critics are saying, a return to form. Juno Temple is great :)
Just seen episode 1. The kind of "prestige TV" that demonstrates the limits of the medium. The use of light in the shootout scenes was begging for the full cinema treatment. I was very pleasantly surprised by how good this one was. Will be sticking with it until the end.
 
Just seen episode 1. The kind of "prestige TV" that demonstrates the limits of the medium. The use of light in the shootout scenes was begging for the full cinema treatment. I was very pleasantly surprised by how good this one was. Will be sticking with it until the end.
You ensure you do that, because it is a great season, I’d say nothing less than joint second best.
 
Just finished it last night, another absolute cracker. Juno Temple is astoundingly good (and I've just discovered she is the niece of Nina 'CPGB' Temple, what a lass).

I'm not wholly convinced it was as mom n apple pie as some of the above comments make it sound (they could only be so nice because of a show of overwhelming force, after all) but if liberalism was as nice as this, then there'd be a hope for it.
 
Was Munch's life story deliberately inconsistent?

He was supposed to have come from Wales but claimed never to have seen a mountain until he got to North America. When he ate the sun it was the 1500s but then he said he crossed the Atlantic in a longboat.
Munch's story was nonsense. It doesn't matter though.
 
Back
Top Bottom