Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Establishment networking, sleaze and corruption. A handy compendium.

They have a piece about this on their site, also a link to a petition:

 

"Update on Just how does public money end up in the pockets of Cummings' friends?

We are pleased to report that the High Court has ordered the Government to pay 75% of our costs in our successful legal challenge against Michael Gove for the unlawful award of a contract to associates of his and Dominic Cummings at Public First.
Government had planned to ask for permission to appeal the ruling but last night decided this wouldn’t be wise and withdrew, belatedly accepting their conduct over the Public First contract had been unlawful.
They did however still attempt to argue in Court today at the costs hearing that we hadn’t won on every ground in our challenge, so the Court should make a costs order which reflects the ‘relative success of both parties’. Yet however Government try to spin this ruling in the press, the Judge today was crystal clear as to who won this case:

“In this case, it is clear to the court that the claimant (Good Law Project) was the overall successful party in the case...it sought a ruling that the decision to award the contract to Public First was unlawful, and the Court has made a ruling to that effect. Also, it was successful in defeating the Defendant’s arguments about standing.”

Our work is far from over, but for now, we take a moment to celebrate this win. Thank you, as ever, for all your support. "
 

"Update on Just how does public money end up in the pockets of Cummings' friends?

We are pleased to report that the High Court has ordered the Government to pay 75% of our costs in our successful legal challenge against Michael Gove for the unlawful award of a contract to associates of his and Dominic Cummings at Public First.
Government had planned to ask for permission to appeal the ruling but last night decided this wouldn’t be wise and withdrew, belatedly accepting their conduct over the Public First contract had been unlawful.
They did however still attempt to argue in Court today at the costs hearing that we hadn’t won on every ground in our challenge, so the Court should make a costs order which reflects the ‘relative success of both parties’. Yet however Government try to spin this ruling in the press, the Judge today was crystal clear as to who won this case:

“In this case, it is clear to the court that the claimant (Good Law Project) was the overall successful party in the case...it sought a ruling that the decision to award the contract to Public First was unlawful, and the Court has made a ruling to that effect. Also, it was successful in defeating the Defendant’s arguments about standing.”

Our work is far from over, but for now, we take a moment to celebrate this win. Thank you, as ever, for all your support. "
These people are gods.

Or at least the nearest thing to it we're likely to see in the foreseeable future, and certainly god-like by comparison to the demons cavorting orgiastically in the Tory party.
 
"Why we are referring a series of transactions involving the Prime Minister's advisor Munira Mirza, Priti Patel and Matt Hancock to the Serious Fraud Office. THREAD."



Government's position has always been that the award of PPE contracts was a politically neutral process. Its usual formulation is that all PPE contracts were awarded pursuant to "the same eight-stage process to assess and process offers." See for example https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/u...-procurement-during-the-COVID-19-pandemic.pdf

However, @GoodLawProject has uncovered evidence that go-betweens who had little apparent to offer apart from their political connections were paid vast sums of money to deliver contracts.

We don't believe there is any 'good' explanation for this fact. We believe it points powerfully to the process being corrupt. And (as we will show) certain details of the process itself point in the same direction. That is why we are referring the matter to @UKSFO.
 
Fair play to the Good Law Project for referring all this to the SFO bu tbh i haven't got a great deal of faith in them. They are too willing to cave in to political pressure to drop investigations, even ones that are live. Witness the Saudi bribes and BAE systems scandal which Blair leant on them to drop.
 
Not sure what the consequences of the GLP stuff are, nobody will do time or have to send the money back, it just feels like an expensive and probably pointless gotcha.

I guess if anything it might help in sorting out the order of the gallows stuff, come the revolution.
 
Not sure what the consequences of the GLP stuff are, nobody will do time or have to send the money back, it just feels like an expensive and probably pointless gotcha.

I guess if anything it might help in sorting out the order of the gallows stuff, come the revolution.
If anything it has made the cunts in charge a bit more wary of dishing out the cash to mates. That has made it worth it even if no-one ends up banged up.
 
Back in the good old days just after the Empire collapsed, we had speculators and asset strippers beavering away in the shadows between legal and illegal, making fortunes as a result. Now we have no decent assets left apart from what is nominally owned by the public. It’s not that politicians are corrupt and outsiders want to scavenge what was always previously considered as sacrosanct-we expect that - it’s just how fucking cheaply they can be bought that is astounding. So petty and seedy. Crap politicians
 
Yet more dirt which gives the lie to their statements to the contrary:

 
Yet more dirt which gives the lie to their statements to the contrary:

Every minister that used personal emails should be sacked & prosecuted. It is well out of order & none of these emails will appear in an inquiry when it happens.
 
Tory MP Danny Kruger has said that "the accusation that the government has been corrupt in handing out cash to their mates is a conspiracy theory on a par with anti-vax conspiracy theories."

Does anybody believe this shit I wonder.

 
Does not seem right to me at all, case thrown out because of wrong email address:


e2a:

1625036061810.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom