Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Essential Trump/Alt-Right Ridicule Thread

BBC News - Trump's tax returns released after years-long effort


" In 2017, the Times reported, Trump paid just $750 (£623) in federal income tax despite being a billionaire."

I have to say it's no surprise.

Nope, it's no surprise. I paid more in taxes than he did two of the four years he was president. That's not as a percentage, that's actual dollars.

I've also paid more in taxes than most of the 25 richest Americans:

 
Andrew Tate may be outside this wheelhouse a bit, but he's pretty fashy and I've never seen someone own themselves so hard they actually got arrested before.

Starting with the pathetic spectacle of a man in his late 30s trying to troll a 19-year-old climate activist:

View attachment 357722

Followed by him being utterly destroyed in a single line:

View attachment 357723
Which gets 3 million likes, prompting him to put out a video in some sort of dressing gown setup which merely makes him look even more pathetic, and includes him bringing in a pizza for a prop (?):

View attachment 357725
Leading the Romanian police straight to his house, where they arrest him over an outstanding warrant for people trafficking.


Good times :cool:

Andrew Tate continues to remind me of some of the predatory lounge lizards who would try to pick me up in discos in the late 70s, complete with unbuttoned shirts and tacky gold chains.
 
Last edited:
Trump in 2014: "If I decide to run for office I'll produce my tax returns." (1:37)
Trump in 2016:
Screenshot 2022-12-30 at 14.54.38.png
Trump in 2022 following the release of his tax returns: "There is no legitimate legislative purpose for their action. And if you look at what they’ve done, it’s so sad for our country.”
 
323136136_1128044267894102_5697370605365810405_n.jpg
 
Kind of mad that everyone appears to be waking up at the end of 2022 to the Misogynist Tate when a few years ago he piggy backed on Tommy Robinson's harassment of journalist Mike Stuchberry to try and take some of the limelight for his intended fash audience.
 
mentioned him ages back, on the Everard thread. Then promptly got my head bitten off. So he's only 'new' to some of us.


Kind of mad that everyone appears to be waking up at the end of 2022 to the Misogynist Tate when a few years ago he piggy backed on Tommy Robinson's harassment of journalist Mike Stuchberry to try and take some of the limelight for his intended fash audience.

This is real I’m the King of the Castle stuff mate.

What’s made you cross though? That he wasn’t given props or that you weren’t?

Maybe you were the first (here’s a medal for you) but Tate has been discussed on various threads, I’m pretty sure. And just because there’s no dedicated thread or endless ongoing discussion of this pratt doesn’t mean no one here was aware of him. He’s not especially newsworthy outside his foul misogyny but this beautiful own goal is too good to ignore. The fact that it gets posted up and commented on tells you he’s definitely been on the radar.
 
This is real I’m the King of the Castle stuff mate.

What’s made you cross though? That he wasn’t given props or that you weren’t?

Maybe you were the first (here’s a medal for you) but Tate has been discussed on various threads, I’m pretty sure. And just because there’s no dedicated thread or endless ongoing discussion of this pratt doesn’t mean no one here was aware of him. He’s not especially newsworthy outside his foul misogyny but this beautiful own goal is too good to ignore. The fact that it gets posted up and commented on tells you he’s definitely been on the radar.
He first cropped up alongside Tommy Robinson attacking a journalist’s house. Yeah I feel sore for yet again talking about something on the wrong thread at the wrong time and now here we are and he’s famous.
 
He first cropped up alongside Tommy Robinson attacking a journalist’s house.
No, that was 2019 wasn't it? He was being discussed in relation to coattailling SYL at least since 2018 (e.g. his 'I'm flying in some deadly Romanian lumps to teach Antifa a lesson' twitter bullshit)
 
No, that was 2019 wasn't it? He was being discussed in relation to coattailling SYL at least since 2018 (e.g. his 'I'm flying in some deadly Romanian lumps to teach Antifa a lesson' twitter bullshit)
Fair enough. I'm not saying I was the first. I'm sore because I got thrown off a thread for saying perhaps we should organise against misogynists like we do fascists and it got filed under 'male violence :rolleyes: ' and all was well again in libland.
 
Have you ever been involved in organised action btw or just posting memes on the internet? I know what I suspect but you've got time to change my mind.

You obviously suspect that I’ve never been involved in direct/ organised action.

Why do I need to change your mind? What you believe about me is not important to me, but it seems to be important to you.


Of course I’ve been involved in organised action. I’ve even organised some myself. What’s your point?


This has gone weird, and just a little bit smalldickenergy tbh .
 
Fair enough. I'm not saying I was the first. I'm sore because I got thrown off a thread for saying perhaps we should organise against misogynists like we do fascists and it got filed under 'male violence :rolleyes: ' and all was well again in libland.

Thats a different issue. and without the links I can’t make any judgment about what happened there.

If you’re really so sore about that take it up in community chat or feedback.
It looks really silly here.
 
You obviously suspect that I’ve never been involved in direct/ organised action.

Why do I need to change your mind? What you believe about me is not important to me, but it seems to be important to you.


Of course I’ve been involved in organised action. I’ve even organised some myself. What’s your point?


This has gone weird, and just a little bit smalldickenergy tbh .
It's the fact that I'm saying things that might be of importance and you're turning it into me being in a competition. Like we're not on the same side. When we are. There's plenty of those on here. Do nothing but put down lots. I just wondered if you were one of them.
 
It's the fact that I'm saying things that might be of importance and you're turning it into me being in a competition. Like we're not on the same side. When we are. There's plenty of those on here. Do nothing but put down lots. I just wondered if you were one of them.

What’s the important bit? That you said something somewhere that I haven’t read? Or the response to that, which I also haven’t read?



You didn’t frame it as an us and them thing, you just said ”I said it first! It was me!” which struck me as childish and irrelevant, so I took the piss a bit.

Not sure how both of us hugely disliking Tate puts us on opposite sides of the argument tho.
 
What’s the important bit? That you said something somewhere that I haven’t read? Or the response to that, which I also haven’t read?



You didn’t frame it as an us and them thing, you just said ”I said it first! It was me!” which struck me as childish and irrelevant, so I took the piss a bit.

Not sure how both of us hugely disliking Tate puts us on opposite sides of the argument tho.
Fair dos, you personally weren't there when I got kicked off a thread for suggesting organising against misogynists like we do fascists. It just irked me that people are now going OMG TATE! who appear to me to be one and the same as their politics seem to be pretty much aligned.
Pretty much evidenced with your childish posting up of a medal etc. I mean really?
 
I still can’t make any comment or judgment about what happened because you still haven’t provided any links.

Maybe you framed it in a way that didn’t land right. Maybe the people on that thread at that time weren’t receptive in the way that other people might have been. Maybe you didn’t read the room right, maybe the comtext wasn’t what you thought it was, maybe the mood on that day wasn’t combative. Or maybe you were treated unfairly and that will be obvious now. I don’t know. So I can’t pursue this discussion.

I‘m sorry your feelings were hurt Magnus, and I’m sorry that it still rankles.


That‘s all I got for you right now




Oh wait, did you say this happened on the Sarah Everard thread? Well in that case I imagine people were completely sick and tired of male violence and really weren’t in the right headspace to be thinking of going on the attack. I don’t remember the exchange (you obviously do) but I was on that thread. Sarah was kidnapped from just around the corner from my home. Had she got home safely she would have walked right past my house.

Your anger came out as wanting to go on the offensive, but maybe that wasn’t the right time or place to make that stand?
 
Oh wait, did you say this happened on the Sarah Everard thread? Well in that case I imagine people were completely sick and tired of male violence and really weren’t in the right headspace to be thinking of going on the attack. I don’t remember the exchange (you obviously do) but I was on that thread. Sarah was kidnapped from just around the corner from my home. Had she got home safely she would have walked right past my house.

Your anger came out as wanting to go on the offensive, but maybe that wasn’t the right time or place to make that stand?
My anger? A suggestion to organise isn't an expression of anger. It's a suggestion to organise. But yes, your interpretation was the same and because I said it it must have meant anger.
 
Back
Top Bottom