Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Epistemology

this assertion is impossible to justify, because it is claiming that justification is impossible

the burden is on those who think knowledge is possible, to say how it could possibly be, how they can refute the sceptic

Horseshit. The burden is on anyone who posits a viewpoint to back theirs up. The notion that there is a default setting that is scientific or philosophical fact and can not or could not be questioned is the philosophy of tyranny, idiocy, superstition, and monothought. It is an anti-philosophic viewpoint, an anti-intellectual viewpoint, an anti-academic viewpoint. It is one that dismisses enquiry, shuns experiment, and denies questioning.


I will have no part in that sort of mindset I think.
 
Me either bluestreak. It is completely cretinous, tbh.

Its funny that those who argue they are open to the infinite possibility of nothingness are open to nothing else.
 
bluestreak disagrees with you and evidently thinks knowledge is possible somehow


Woo-hoo.

You're either one of the best wind-up merchants we've had on here since ern was given his p45 or you're even thicker than any of us suspected.
 
Nobody can refute the skeptic. But because you cannot refute a claim does not make it true.

the sceptic does not make a claim though, other people make unfounded, unjustifiable claims against the non-existent sceptical claims

What do you think of 9/11 and conspiracy theories, max? do you think that being able to deny that the planes were holograms makes it true?


i think it is impossible to know


And even so, what difference do such claims actually make to human existence? What does it matter to anybody, whether an irrefutable claim is true or not?

it matters to the epistemologist
 
What about the holocaust? Do you know it happened? Do you think you can deny that it did?

I am getting a bit of a feeling of misunderstood post-modern nihilism, now.
 
What about the holocaust? Do you know it happened? Do you think you can deny that it did?


i cant deny that it happened (because that implies knowledge)

but i can certainly doubt that it happened

i can doubt that it didnt happen too

smiley_dance.gif
 
So let me get this straight - the skeptic makes no claims whatsoever about anything?
 
Back
Top Bottom