platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
Transtransportism?
Entirely unashamed anti car propaganda, and the more the better.
- Thread starter teuchter
- Start date
Transtransportism?
We’ve been prioritising people in cars (at the expense of everyone else)for decades. Look what happens when we change that!
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
Space-occupancy-fetishists should learn about the other determinants of utility-value.
liquidindian
Hello
My favourite Elephant Six band.
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
Yeah, randomly thinking back to when Colesgrove Farm near Cheshunt was re-wilded green space and not an unpleasant newbuild housing estate:
liquidindian
Hello
Fits the thread, nice one.
teuchter
je suis teuchter
Looks like everything was previously working well round there, just by Colesgrove Farm rewilded green space, in the middle of an area of typical of post war sprawling car-centric housing development.
Certainly looks like cars aren't causing any issues because who cares about people walking on pavements or trying to use bus stops and public transport anyway.
It's all fine that the new houses have been built with big garage spaces. Concepts like car free developments shouldn't be allowed to spread beyond places like communist London.
Certainly looks like cars aren't causing any issues because who cares about people walking on pavements or trying to use bus stops and public transport anyway.
It's all fine that the new houses have been built with big garage spaces. Concepts like car free developments shouldn't be allowed to spread beyond places like communist London.
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
Lots of whataboutery there.
And yes, car-free developments are often unviable outside big cities, because in such sparsely populated communities the dense public transport networks that make travel convenient in London are simply not sustainable.
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
Superimpose London's bus network and then estimate how many passengers per bus there would be
liquidindian
Hello
And yes, car-free developments are often viable in big cities, because in such densely populated communities the public transport networks that make travel convenient are sustainable.
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
Yes, teuchter has said previously he wants to forcibly relocate the entire population to tower blocks within the M25.
farmerbarleymow
I'm Petee's spirit animal
That makes perfect sense - would free up large amounts of land to grow turnips to feed people.
farmerbarleymow
I'm Petee's spirit animal
There is perhaps a missing piece of the puzzle here. What would all these car drivers do if, after the great banning, they couldn't use their cars to follow their favourite hobby of dogging? They'd be devastated the poor (sexually frustated) loves. 
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
No doubt everyone here will be voting Sunak when their ballot papers drop through their letterboxes 
Dense cities with no gardens so everyone can walk everywhere:
Dense cities with no gardens so everyone can walk everywhere:
maomao
普費斯
A small fraction of the money saved by the NHS could be used to set up public dogging shelters with condom machines, glory holes, wind down windows to wank through and hire bike docking stations. The only possible problem is that the increased fitness that comes with cycling and walking everywhere will make participants considerably more physically attractive and virile and may cause the hobby to become more widespread.There is perhaps a missing piece of the puzzle here. What would all these car drivers do if, after the great banning, they couldn't use their cars to follow their favourite hobby of dogging? They'd be devastated the poor (sexually frustated) loves.
liquidindian
Hello
If there's a lesson of the last few years it's that if good policy ideas are championed by otherwise bad people, that doesn't make them bad policies. It works the other way round too. We're essentially back at "Hitler was a vegetarian, you know".
No doubt everyone here will be voting Sunak when their ballot papers drop through their letterboxes
Dense cities with no gardens so everyone can walk everywhere:
Is it Truss or Mordaunt for you Nads?
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
What proportion of the cyclists and pedestrians had passengers?
Fuck me! Probably the stupidest thing you’ve said on here!
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
Go on then, tell me what you mean by “efficient” in your previous post.
I said inefficient - or maybe all of them were transporting fridges or something…
platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
How are you measuring this inefficiency, i.e. what is your measure of efficiency? It's certainly not persons per vehicle, as that would make cars more efficient than cyclists, so it must be something else.
How are you measuring this inefficiency, i.e. what is your measure of efficiency? It's certainly not persons per vehicle, as that would make cars more efficient than cyclists, so it must be something else.
mad Nads at it again. Or is everyone carrying a 3 piece suite around in a metal box suddenly super efficient.
