Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Entirely unashamed anti car propaganda, and the more the better.

Regardless, wherever that is - the streets must be paved with cotton wool for all those cyclists not to bother wearing helmets, or is not wearing helmets something you condone?
Cotton wool streets, Yep, that must be the Dutch secret. Can’t possibly be anything else.
 
Logical fallacy again. Cars are 4 or 5 times the width of cycle-twats and therefore significantly easier to spot. Modern ones even have lights that come on automatically at dusk to make them even easier for incompetent morons to spot. Personally I couldn't give a toss whether or not cyclists wear helmets. It's your head. Hi Viz should definitely be made compulsory though as it enables me to spot you drunken stoners well in advance, anticipate your impending maladroit manoeuvres, and avoid damaging my paintwork with your iPod-stuffed lycra wear.

Yellow cars have nearly 50% less accidents black and grey cars do. What colour is your car? Driving a car any other colour than white, yellow or orange is pure vanity and endangers lives.
 
And I bet that's absolutely nothing to do with the fact that there are hardly any yellow cars on the roads.
Per car. And it's been unfashionable (unbless you're an American cab driver or a cunt in a lambro) for a couple of decades but cars used to be a much wider variety of colours. And white ones, orange ones and yellow ones have less accidents per car.
 
But what does that mean in practice? At what point, practically, do you propose banning private cars?
We're pretty close to a point where it would be practical to do it in central (maybe up to zone 2) London, for example. In fact, it's already the case that "car free" housing developments where you are not given any parking place are commonplace.

How long it will be in other UK cities depends on how quickly politics allows progressive, incremental restrictions to be introduced.

Here's an example of a small city in Germany which did it a quite a few years back.

 
Why don't you wear a helmet?

Because I have a seatbelt, airbags, front crumple zone to dissipate front collision energy, not to mention the fact I’m sealed inside metal bodywork of the van.

Aside from my travel to my delivery route, I’m rarely higher than third gear so, low speeds.

Now compare all that to a cyclist and I’m sure you’ll agree that wearing a helmet for cycling is really a must.
 
By the way, I'd be happy with providing state-subsidised racetracks in any area where car use was widely restricted. On compassionate grounds, like methadone is provided. No problem really who want to race around and get off on being in semi-control of something very powerful - I can even see the attraction myself. Just, let's not do it on the public streets please.

At the racetracks there could be social events on Sundays where they all go and wash their cars, polish their hubcaps and that. Even whatever that guy in the GIF was doing to the exhaust pipe. Honestly I've not got any problem with people having hobbies like this.
 
We're pretty close to a point where it would be practical to do it in central (maybe up to zone 2) London, for example. In fact, it's already the case that "car free" housing developments where you are not given any parking place are commonplace.

How long it will be in other UK cities depends on how quickly politics allows progressive, incremental restrictions to be introduced.

Here's an example of a small city in Germany which did it a quite a few years back.


City centres will be realtively easy; the vast majority of people who live there don't have cars, and would prefer safer roads and cleaner air, and they have excellent public transport. But, they're very atypical of how and where most people in the Uk live.

Vaubun might be ok, if served by excellent public transport. But it's important ti remember that people voluntarily moved there knowing it has (almost) no cars; that's different from telling peole who want to keep their cars that they can't.
 
Tbf everyone is looking sexier rn. On account of being unable to fuck anyone senseless. :mad::D

Then accessibility for everyone must be a priority. Is this a road surface issue? As I do know how difficult it was simply to wheel my son to the shop in his wheel chair.

Ghent is medieval cobbled streets, café furniture on pavements, in the city centre anyway. And it stinks, but that's just the river.
 
I believe that HV works, from my observations of it. Reflective vests work too. What I don't understand are the cyclists/walkers who wear HV and reflective gear then put on a back pack or similar and cover it up.

As someone who used to cycle many miles, and who, until lock down, drove many kilometres I don't understand how cyclists/walkers can't understand how important it is to be seen.
 
I believe that HV works, from my observations of it. Reflective vests work too. What I don't understand are the cyclists/walkers who wear HV and reflective gear then put on a back pack or similar and cover it up.

As someone who used to cycle many miles, and who, until lock down, drove many kilometres I don't understand how cyclists/walkers can't understand how important it is to be seen.

Again, road position is more important than clothing for visibility.
 
You're clearly not quite the full Clarkson then. Every time it's proposed/implemented the motoring brigade have a tendency to wail somewhat.
Where limits make sense they should be implented. On roads near schools or heavily built-up areas 20mph, or maybe even slower, often makes sense. Conversely, 70 mph on many stretches of motorway is too slow. Some studies show that where speed limits are removed, drivers will travel at lower speeds than they do with speed limits. On 30mph roads most drivers will drive at 30mph, whereas if the limit is removed they tend to drive at what they consider reasonable for the piece of road, which in built up areas may be 20mph. Contrary to U75 belief, drivers don't want to have accidents.
 
But, they're very atypical of how and where most people in the Uk live.
Actually, there is a large proportion of the UK population living in quite similar streets to what you find in much of zone two london. Victorian terraces and edwardian semis.
 
I believe that HV works, from my observations of it.
Of course it does. These tubes are going on a ridiculously flawed study by Cycling UK which said that HV didn't make any difference to how close cars passed the cyclists. Like that was all that matters. They also state that cyclists who wear hi viz put cyclists who don't wear hi-viz at a disadvantage. This is because Cycling UK are mainly a bunch of fucking bell-ends.
 
Actually, there is a large proportion of the UK population living in quite similar streets to what you find in much of zone two london. Victorian terraces and edwardian semis.
Nearly 85% of the UK population is urban but Athos is using cheap sophistry to try and claim the interests of the suburban population of cities are the same as those of the rural popultion. Personally, I think cars are a bit like shotguns. Very dangerous but probably have a place in the countryside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cid
Back
Top Bottom