Blah, blah, identity politics.... riot... middle class... meh. It's shit and lazy criticism, nothing worth thinking about in there tbh.
Saying what won the Poll Tax was the riots not the mass non-payment is just wrong isn't it? It was both, and there's no way that the former would have happened without the later. The non-payment local groups provided much of the groundwork for building up the movement that led to the riots, and then it provided a longer term support for the fall-out from them. Plus it gave people the feeling they weren't alone, built confidence, gave a mix of people stuff they could do, etc. All this calling non-payment individualistic bollocks is also just missing the point, it's an attempt to get away from that by a collective refusal. Anyway, I could go on...
You've gone on quite enough tbh. Local groups varied very much in a) when they were set up; b) their longevity; c) their politics and d) their effectiveness. I don't think there's the link you suggest between local groups and riots or between riots and local groups.
My first involvement with the poll tax post riot was a public meeting called to set up a local group, where from a packed hall only three remained to do the work, me, a stalinist and a Trot. So certainly where I lived at the time the riots didn't bring a ton of activists in. In Hackney where there was a big riot in front of the town hall (somewhere I have some pictures
Fozzie Bear) there wasn't a longstanding group as there was in Haringey or Camden, perhaps because at the time half the population of the borough moved each year.
The only reason there was any support for the fallout from the 31.3.90 and 20.10.90 riots was tsdc, the trafalgar square defendants campaign, for which dave morris out of the mclibel 2 was a great force. I don't know of any support organised for people nicked in front of town halls, I never saw any information on the people jailed for it or discussion in anti-poll tax groups I was involved in. I don't think the information was ever gathered or acted on. If you know anything different I'd be very interested to know.
For me a great part of what toppled thatcher was the spring of poll tax riots. But what broke the poll tax was non-payment and the government decision to lower bills by £140 (£136 in Wandsworth) announced in March 1991. Although vat was put up 2.5% to pay for it. But at that point, when the decision to abolish was announced, you lost fuck loads of people from the apt movement. The swp had pulled put before that. But many areas hardly had local groups. I remember having a great list of London groups and phoning round them for London fight the poll tax and speaking to someone from Sutton.
But many areas had a group more in name only. And although there were calls for an amnesty for poll tax non-payment and the debts to be written off that never happened. As time went on anti-poll tax groups dissolved even though court cases and bailiff action continued. In the final year of the poll tax being levied, 93/94, can't have been many groups supporting non-payment left. But it was years after that that council's stopped chasing the money.
It's always nice to see a big win. But the poll tax wasn't won on 31 march 90. It wasn't the riots that win it. It was the extent of opposition shown through non-payment and the way that in that year, 90/91, people refused to pay.
So yeh Martin's called this one wrong for me. But it's also wrong to see local groups providing the impetus for the riots across the board and local groups providing support for the fallout after. Many local groups were short-term coalitions of activists and where Haringey became a solidarity group, moves to do the same in Camden foundered when only a few anarchists wanted to do that and almost all the Marxists were against it. But the role of militant and the swp deserves fuller investigation because for their own sectarian reasons they tried to undermine groups of other political hues where they couldn't control them.