EDL watch

[malatesta32]

crivvens folks! it's a fecken joke! i'm no association soccer fancier but i can assure you ICF, bushwhackers, CCS or Leeds dont give a feck about kevin smith and his fantasy football hooliganism. clearly, my irony is getting rusty.
edit: and thank fuck someone got the 'fragrant' reference.

 

[butchersapron]

Stop saying crivvens as well.

 

[Pickman's model]

crivvens folks! it's a fecken joke! i'm no association soccer fancier but i can assure you ICF, bushwhackers, CCS or Leeds dont give a feck about kevin smith and his fantasy football hooliganism. clearly, my irony is getting rusty.
edit: and thank fuck someone got the 'fragrant' reference.

crivvens has jumped the shark.

 

[Pickman's model]

association soccer

soccer derives from association

 

[butchersapron]

edit: and thank fuck someone got the 'fragrant' reference.

What was it?

 

[Pickman's model]

What was it?

i haven't read the previous page. but it is traditionally a reference to mary archer.

'Fragrant' Mary Archer
During the 1987 libel trial Mary Archer famously took the stand to support her husband.
The judge was so impressed by her demeanour that he mused why any husband would seek the company of a prostitute when he had Mrs Archer at home.
Summing up, Mr Justice Caulfield described Mrs Archer as a vision of "elegance, fragrance and radiance".
Lord Archer won his libel action and was awarded £500,000 damages.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1420403.stm

 

[ddraig]

crivvens folks! it's a fecken joke! i'm no association soccer fancier but i can assure you ICF, bushwhackers, CCS or Leeds dont give a feck about kevin smith and his fantasy football hooliganism. clearly, my irony is getting rusty.
edit: and thank fuck someone got the 'fragrant' reference.

it's really not funny is it and gives people an easy and justified reason to disregard your communiques

 

[Fozzie Bear]

What was it?

http://www.urban75.net/forums/threads/edl-watch.262722/page-588#post-13932920

The judge displaying his high regard for Mary Archer's appearance.

If Mal fancies Gail Speight I guess that's his business, but it seems like a weird thing to bring up on an anti-fascist blog.

 

[butchersapron]

i haven't read the previous page. but it is traditionally a reference to mary archer.

Private eye have been using it in a sexist way since well before then - and if not, it's been used consistently in that way since - why on earth was it used here? It was used as a generic descriptor for women this idiot doesn't like the look of.

Must be hard walking around deciding whose fragrant and who isn't. Some of those cows are missing teeth too.

 

[malatesta32]

Stop saying crivvens as well.

okay, are there any other words you need to censor on the internet? and also, a political train spotter like you should have got the fragrance reference butchers:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1420403.stm

 

[butchersapron]

okay, are there any other words you need to censor on the internet? and also, a political train spotter like you should have got the fragrance reference butchers:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1420403.stm

I think saying you've overdone a crass allusion is not censorship. Every update of your blog telling people what other people are doing on facebook starts with it.

 

[malatesta32]

look, the whole soccer thing is about some bloke reckoning on 'uniting all firms/fans against islam:
https://afffmai.wordpress.com/
which is obviously impossible given the nature of rivalry between various firms (leeds, man u, milwall/west ham) and it is intended to illustrate the futility of uniting such fractious groups, i.e., who does this kevin smith think he is?

 

[butchersapron]

crivvens boab etc fuck off to clapton

 

[butchersapron]

OMG the FASCISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[malatesta32]

it's really not funny is it and gives people an easy and justified reason to disregard your communiques

if you want to get pedantic about it, funny is a subjective term and if someone finds something funny therefore it is funny to them, maybe not funny to everyone, but it is funny in certain situation. i thought folk on here realised the blog is satire? i wouldnt take it so seriously. i dont.

 

[butchersapron]

if you want to get pedantic about it, funny is a subjective term and if someone finds something funny therefore it is funny to them, maybe not funny to everyone, but it is funny in certain situation. i thought folk on here realised the blog is satire? i wouldnt take it so seriously. i dont.

 

[malatesta32]

crivvens boab etc fuck off to clapton

i live in edinburgh butchers and i hate soccer in case you hadnt noticed. but dont worry, i will overlook you missing the 'fragrant' reference .

 

[Fozzie Bear]

if you want to get pedantic about it, funny is a subjective term and if someone finds something funny therefore it is funny to them, maybe not funny to everyone, but it is funny in certain situation. i thought folk on here realised the blog is satire? i wouldnt take it so seriously. i dont.

Nobody on this thread so far thinks that blog post is funny.

It's clear you don't take that blog very seriously. Perhaps that is why that blog post isn't very good.

Do you actually fancy Gail Speight then?

 

[malatesta32]

dont do a terry eagleton butchers cos you sound like a terry fuckwit. i dont know who the mullet is up there but i am sure his audience thought he was funny. which is probably why he seems to have been on TV.

 

[butchersapron]

if you want to get pedantic about it, funny is a subjective term and if someone finds something funny therefore it is funny to them, maybe not funny to everyone, but it is funny in certain situation. i thought folk on here realised the blog is satire? i wouldnt take it so seriously. i dont.

Where is the satire? It's just you copying stuff from facebook and making a shit sexist or homopohic comment. Where's the original content - the satire?

 

[malatesta32]

Nobody on this thread so far thinks that blog post is funny.

It's clear you don't take that blog very seriously. Perhaps that is why that blog post isn't very good.

Do you actually fancy Gail Speight then?

dont you realise its satire? and no, if you look at the blog entries on rotherham you can see how i despise gail speight and her political opportunism over the 1400 abuse cases (although not as much as some EDL).

 

[butchersapron]

dont do a terry eagleton butchers cos you sound like a terry fuckwit. i dont know who the mullet is up there but i am sure his audience thought he was funny. which is probably why he seems to have been on TV.

He's a 70s comedian who just argues that if someone finds something funny therefore it is funny to them, maybe not funny to everyone, but it is funny in certain situation.

Crack on with the racist jokes.

 

[malatesta32]

Where is the satire? It's just you copying stuff from facebook and making a shit sexist or homopohic comment. Where's the original content - the satire?

homophobic?

 

[butchersapron]

dont you realise its satire? and no, if you look at the blog entries on rotherham you can see how i despise gail speight and her political opportunism over the 1400 abuse cases (although not as much as some EDL).

What on earth do you think satire is?

 

[butchersapron]

homophobic?

Yep. Did you actually remove that stuff then?

 

[malatesta32]

He's a 70s comedian who just argues that if someone finds something funny therefore it is funny to them, maybe not funny to everyone, but it is funny in certain situation.

Crack on with the racist jokes.

yes funny is a subjective term, like tasty, or interesting. it is a matter of personal preference and is not a universal state. whetehr something is politically dodgy is also a matter of taste.

 

[butchersapron]

yes funny is a subjective term, like tasty, or interesting. it is a matter of personal preference and is not a universal state. whetehr something is politically dodgy is also a matter of taste.

Bang on with the chav paki queer bashing then, Is there anyway that subjetive opinion could be set within a wider framework - i.e a commitment not to be a cunt? You might call it society, or principles. Or anti-fascism.

Clown.

 

[butchersapron]

yes funny is a subjective term, like tasty, or interesting. it is a matter of personal preference and is not a universal state. whetehr something is politically dodgy is also a matter of taste.

The free market in full effect. We're all individual consumers now.

 

[malatesta32]

i was initially talking about whether something is funny or not. if someone thinks so it is, if someone doesnt, it isnt to them. subject matter is also a matter of personal preference so why would i, an anarchist, make those kinds of jokes? but you overlooked that bit and went for the 'cunt' and 'clown' insults.

 

[Fozzie Bear]

dont you realise its satire? and no, if you look at the blog entries on rotherham you can see how i despise gail speight and her political opportunism over the 1400 abuse cases (although not as much as some EDL).

You despise her, but find her "fragrant"?

Or is that sarcasm (it really isn't satire, mal) in which case you would seem to be taking the piss out of a woman based on her appearance/aroma?