Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
i thought that the real reason the east london line extension isn't going to brixton was so beautiful hackney doesn't get invaded by south londoners.
Originally posted by squidlet
Exactly ! It takes me 45 minutes on the comfort of the top deck of the 45 to get from Loughborough Junction to King's Cross. And if I'm in a rush I can get Thameslink or the tube. North -South is not the problmm. I really think this tram thing is a re herring and waste of time. I haven't seen how it works in Croydon but presumably there must be some pretty massive engineering / power-supply / road widening / remodelling that needs to be done. And unnecessary, certainly northbound. Can that really be more expensive than opening up cross-London rail links by building on existing stations at LJ and Brixton ? Its not exactly massive engineering to build upwards - not like digging a new tube station. Has anyone looked at / critiqued the feasibility studies ? And does anyone know when the next Forum meeting is ?
Wouldn't surprise me one little bit.Originally posted by hatboy
I don't know whether there's anything behind it, but I feel some council meetings are selectively minuted, perhaps (I say perhaps) leaving out comments from members of the public whoever is in charge thinks don't fit with the council's agenda.
Maybe so but they've been bloody handy for me. And the trams are always mostly full so obviously popular with Londoners.Originally posted by calum
i asked ken about the trams once a few years ago and he said they were too expensive and the costs of redoing the roads etc was prohibitive. the cryodon one went in at way more expensive than planned
Surely the point is to give a tube station to hitherto unconnected areas of south London? Going across south London is quite difficult at present - try getting a bus from, say, Forest Hill to Putney and it would take you ages. Going IN to London is not a problem from most places in south London as most areas have an overground which gets to victoria/london bridge etc in about 10/15/20 minutes.PacificOcean said:I don't see the point of the southern extention. It goes around London rather than into it. So for example getting on at Anerley will mean a FOURTEEN stations ride before reaching the first tube interchange miles away in Whitechapel.
The planners seem to to want people not to leave Anerley. They could be said to be Anerley retentive.citydreams said:I guess it's handy to get from Anerley to that booming metropolis, Croydon
Brixton Hatter said:Surely the point is to give a tube station to hitherto unconnected areas of south London? Going across south London is quite difficult at present - try getting a bus from, say, Forest Hill to Putney and it would take you ages. Going IN to London is not a problem from most places in south London as most areas have an overground which gets to victoria/london bridge etc in about 10/15/20 minutes.
PacificOcean said:But it's not connecting anything new. It's going over the same track as Southern trains, just branching off at New Cross instead. Same tracks, different trains. I just don't see the point, or am I missing something.
Errol's son said:Clapham Junction is not on the tube.
Perhaps many well-heeled types living over there need an easier way to get to work in the Docklands without having to interchange in central London?
The planners seem to to want people not to leave Anerley. They could be said to be Anerley retentive.
PacificOcean said:Anaork Alert!!!!
Tecnichally Clapham Junction is already connected to the tube. At East Putney the District Line branches off and connects to the bit between Putney and Clapham Junction on the South West Trains Line.