I'm reluctant to jump through any of these ridiculous hoops tbh. Particularly in light of the fact that simply applying for credit can hurt your credit score. You're damned if you do, damned if you don't.
And I much prefer spending money I've already been paid to spending next month's pay cheque. Which to me feels like a much more sensible way to manage money, but nobody gets to skim a percentage off when you do it that way round so it has to be penalised.
You don't have to spend money you don't have.
Random made up numbers: Say you get paid on 15th of the month. Say you get paid £2,000.
Yes, you could think I'm only spending money that I already have so I'm only going to spend what's in my bank account.
You've got a direct debit set up to pay rent, £600, and phone, £25, plus car insurance £100, leaving £1,275.
So you spend £50 on some groceries, and £50 on petrol to get to work, then buy some new trainers, £100. Then you get a takeaway and some beers one night £25. Then you buy more groceries, more petrol. Rinse and repeat.
Yes, you can make those payments on your bank card.
But you could make those payments on a credit card. And pay them off in full as soon as you get your statement. You don't need to spend more money than you have in you bank account. Keep track of your spending. Don't buy anything you wouldn't have bought anyway.
Say throughout the month all those random small payment add up to £1k. Yes, you can pay with your bank card so it goes directly out of your account. Or you can put them on a credit card and pay it off in full once a month.
Even those small purchases can help build a track record of getting bills and making payments.
If you clear it in full each month, they don't skim/charge a percentage.
I've had my card for a year-ish and I haven't paid a penny in interest, because I've always paid it in full each month.
I mean, okay, so I haven't just bought essentials, I've also bought books and artwork, but I haven't bought anything where the money isn't already sitting in my bank account, ready to pay for it. I've deliberately channeled payments through the credit card that I could/should have paid with my bank card, but I knew that paying with a credit card - and paying it off in full each month - would supposedly help improve my credit score. And it did.
I'm not in debt in the accumulative sense. I put stuff on my credit card, and then I pay it off in full, with money that's already in my bank account. Because that's how you game the system.
Because maybe in a year or two I'm going to want to get a mortgage, just like you want to get a place to live. And I knew I wouldn't be able to do that with a poor credit score, so I needed to take preemptive action to improve it.
It's one of the anomalies of credit scoring that people who don't have mortgages, loans, credit cards, can often have poorer credit scores than people who are in heaps of debts with mortgages, loans and credit cards. It doesn't really make sense. Like, how can someone who still owes £50k on their mortgage, has a £10k car loan and £5k on a credit card have a better credit score than someone who rents, bought a second hand car outright, and doesn't have a credit card? How can someone who has £65k of debt have a better credit score than someone who doesn't owe a penny? It doesn't make sense, right?
But the person with £tens of thousands of debt has a better credit score, because they've demonstrated that if a bank/building society lends them money for a house, if a bank/car finance company lends them money for a car, if a credit card company lends them money, then they've made their payments on time, so they've demonstrated they are trustworthy and good for the money.
NB: gaming the system like this only works if you spend only what you would've spent anyway, and what you can pay off in full each month, because otherwise the high interest rates on these credit builder cards are punitive. But if you pay it off in full each month, you don't pay any interest, you just improve your credit score.
I'm just saying: that was the theory, and I was dubious too, but it actually worked for me.
It does require restraint and common sense though. (Hahaha! There's two words I never would've thought could apply to me!
)
I wouldn't recommend it for anyone/everyone, it's just that you mentioned low credit score impacting on your ability to get a tenancy in your own name, and this can - potentially - help with that.