Thora
Differently Ethical
We really enjoyed theAlso the subs add a bit of humor
Dramatic scene plays out and the score kicks in.
Subs: [Mournful Wailing]
[lamenting music plays]
[pensive music plays]
[guttural wails]
We really enjoyed theAlso the subs add a bit of humor
Dramatic scene plays out and the score kicks in.
Subs: [Mournful Wailing]
That’s not everyone’s experience thoughTbf I don't really care that much as I go to the cinema about 3 times a decade. Although having subtitles annoys me as I can't concentrate on the image and just end up reading.
And why did the Hakkunnons send that insect drone needle thing to assassinate Paul, when they also plan to completely destroy House Atreides and take over Arrakis again?
It’s not a pejorative term!Can't wait, am going to the local IMAX with my son on Saturday.....(resent a little being called a 'book wanker')
yes i have been reading and re-reading it for 46 yearsIt’s not a pejorative term!
It just means someone who has the read the original work.
I don't know if it started in general there, but it started in earnest with Game of Thrones.It’s not a pejorative term!
It just means someone who has the read the original work.
If you are going to attack an army and stronghold, causing chaos and attacking moral first is a good strategy.And why did the Hakkunnons send that insect drone needle thing to assassinate Paul, when they also plan to completely destroy House Atreides and take over Arrakis again?
The Harkonnens are a newer great house. They like to shock and appall the stuffy old houses who hide away their bad habits.Are we going to find out why the Baron liked to bathe in an oil tank and why he was into extreme body modification and wafting about floating on a hoverboard attached to a weird black rubber fetishy medicineball?
What nonsense is this you are spouting?The Harkonnens are a newer great house. They like to shock and appall the stuffy old houses who hide away their bad habits.
I'd recommend you don't read the prequel stories by Brian Herbert and Kevin J Anderson thenWhat nonsense is this you are spouting?
They are an old house who slowly grew to power through trade before being granted Arrakis (mining).
The Baron is an ultra-hedonist and an ultra-glutton.
He’ll indulge in any pleasure he can think up, men, women, boys, girls, food, drugs, sadism and politics. Politics is a joy to him. Using and abusing his power a joy.
This has led to him being ultra obese and diseased. Twisted in mind and body.
If it wasn’t for the properties of spice, which the wealthy use to extend life, he’d probably be dead.
p.s. I’d expect better from someone named Idaho. Duncan must be rolling in his clone vat.
Not touching with a barge pole.I'd recommend you don't read the prequel stories by Brian Herbert and Kevin J Anderson then
It’s to make him look evil.The Baron's oily bath was to counter the effects of the poison attack I thought.
In homage to The InbetweenersI don't know if it started in general there, but it started in earnest with Game of Thrones.
Someone says something about him not being over the effects when the bath is first shown, so thought they were making a link.It’s to make him look evil.
It’s dramatic effect.
Nothing to do with the books or plot.
It’s given rise to lots of theories. Pick whichever one you like best.
I prefer the theory that it’s for buoyancy.
Coz he’s so heavy now he needs the weight lifted off his body at all times and he can’t wear suspensors whilst submerged in liquid.
I'm just writing from what I vaguely remember from a brief bit of heretics of dune.What nonsense is this you are spouting?
They are an old house who slowly grew to power through trade before being granted Arrakis (mining).
The Baron is an ultra-hedonist and an ultra-glutton.
He’ll indulge in any pleasure he can think up, men, women, boys, girls, food, drugs, sadism and politics. Politics is a joy to him. Using and abusing his power a joy.
This has led to him being ultra obese and diseased. Twisted in mind and body.
If it wasn’t for the properties of spice, which the wealthy use to extend life, he’d probably be dead.
p.s. I’d expect better from someone named Idaho. Duncan must be rolling in his clone vat.
To be honest writers can contradict themselves.I'm just writing from what I vaguely remember from a brief bit of heretics of dune.
I don't acknowledge any of the Brian Herbert nonsense, if you are referring to that.To be honest writers can contradict themselves.
e.g. House Harkonen are a new house who in previous books had an ancient feud with the Atreides.
Well which is it?
Nope. that wasn't mentioned in the book. Something they added in the movie as part of the word building. Weird for wierdness' sake.Also, what was with the weird spider thing in part 1? It’s shown and commented on once. Bet that’s another book detail that they don’t have time to explain in the film. But if so, WHY BOTHER? Is it an Easter Egg reward for the bookwankers for paying attention?
The assassination attempt was more a distraction and not expected to succeed. So the Atredies would be less likely to uncover the important plot with the traitor Yueh, and have less time to prepare for the military assault.And why did the Hakkunnons send that insect drone needle thing to assassinate Paul, when they also plan to completely destroy House Atreides and take over Arrakis again? It looks like a typical Bondian unnecessary plot device to provide entertainment rather than story. Bit annoying if this is correct, as there’s lots of story and that’s the sort of thing they should cut out as it doesn’t make sense (to non-bookwankers anyway).
A very successful distraction as the Duke kept banging on about it.Nope. that wasn't mentioned in the book. Something they added in the movie as part of the word building. Weird for wierdness' sake.
The assassination attempt was more a distraction and not expected to succeed. So the Atredies would be less likely to uncover the important plot with the traitor Yueh, and have less time to prepare for the military assault.
One of many distractions I should say. They were doing lots to keep the Atredies on the back foot.
I'm with you there for sure.Can't wait, am going to the local IMAX with my son on Saturday.....(resent a little being called a 'book wanker')
Me tooyes i have been reading and re-reading it for 46 years
Because the first one ramped up the expectation. And I think it’s one of those books that a lot of people read when impressionableEveryone is going nuts about this. How come it's getting so much more momentum than the first one?