It's very perplexing but when strange folk set about wiping out a countries minorities and intelligentsia while aspiring to create a purified communist peasant autarky (the quick way) people just tend to notice the mass graves not what they put in their pamphlets (after 77 when they killed off masses of dissident communists and attacked neighbouring countries) or that some of the kids beating people to death are specky bastards.
From Yale's Cambodian Genocide Program.
Reeducation of "base people" via Info Wars and alt-right social media is certainly tidier.
Vice President Biden said in an interview broadcast Monday night that President Obama offered him financial help when his son Beau Biden was suffering from cancer.
In the interview with CNN, the vice president said he had told Obama over one of their regular private lunches that if his son Beau were forced to step down his position as Delaware's attorney general and lose his income because of the brain cancer that ultimately killed him, the vice president and his wife Jill would have to sell their home to pay for Beau's medical expenses.
He said Obama told him not to do that.
"He said ‘I’ll give you the money. Whatever you need, I’ll give you the money. Don’t, Joe. Promise me. Promise me,'” Biden told CNN.
Oh dear, Trump seems to have annoyed Rupert.
Well that's nicely twinned with turning NATO into a defanged protection racket. Follow that up with a trade war on the hapless fragments that's sort of a reverse Marshal Plan.
<snip>
Israel having slid far to the right has been a rather comfortable place under them, at least for the better sort of chap. Crony capitalism and soaring inequality with a large side order of populist racial paranoia. Trump's dream of America made great again may well bear a resemblance.
It is one way to ease the difficulty of brexit negotiationsWith the Italian and French elections it might not need much pushing for the EU to collapse.
It's only a dp if you post something *twice*
Plump for the chump when afraid of being dumped....
Which means the election of Mr Trump fits (from pre-conditions through to outcome) the pattern of betrayal aversion phenomena: fleeing the chance of being betrayed by the agent they trust, American voters opted for a populist, less competent (in traditional Washington’s sense) choice.
Now, enter two brainiacs from Harvard. Rafael Di Tella and Julio Rotemberg were quick on their feet recognising the above emergence of betrayal avoidance or aversion in voting decisions. In their December 2016 NBER paper, linked below, the authors argue that voters preference for populism is the form of “rejection of “disloyal” leaders.” To do this, the authors add an “assumption that people are worse off when they experience low income as a result of leader betrayal”, than when such a loss of income “is the result of bad luck”. In other words, they explicitly assume betrayal aversion in their model of a simple voter choice. The end result is that their model “yields a [voter] preference for incompetent leaders. These deliver worse material outcomes in general, but they reduce the feelings of betrayal during bad times.”
...
Could a reason be because anything left of "moderate" in the EU is crushed?
Spooky....
Walter Sobchak: That rug really tied the room together, did it not?
The Dude: Fuckin' A.
Donny: And this guy peed on it.
Walter Sobchak: Donny, please.
...
The Stranger: Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes, well, he eats you.
...
The Big Lebowski: I didn't blame anyone for the loss of my legs. Some Chinaman took them from me in Korea.
...
Walter Sobchak: Look at our current situation with that camel fucker over in Iraq. Pacifism is not something to hide behind.
...
Walter Sobchak: Whereas what we have here? A bunch of fig-eaters wearing towels on their heads, trying to find reverse in a Soviet tank. This is not a worthy adversary.
...
Donny: Are these the Nazis, Walter?
Walter Sobchak: No, Donny, these men are nihilists. There's nothing to be afraid of.
...
The Dude: At least I'm housebroken.
...
Maude Lebowski: My father's weakness is vanity, hence the slut.
...
[after biting the German's ear off]
Walter Sobchak: Anti-semite!
...
[after recovering his car from the Auto circus]
The Dude: Oh, Jesus, what's that smell, man?
Auto Circus Cop: Yes, probably a vagrant slept in the car. Or maybe just used it as a toilet and moved on.
...
Walter Sobchak: Yeah, the beauty of this is its simplicity. If it gets complex, everything can go wrong.
But is 'ProporNot' not proper prop?
Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady Group
WITH ONLY DAYS until Donald Trump takes office, the Obama administration on Thursday announced new rules that will let the NSA share vast amounts of private data gathered without warrant, court orders or congressional authorization with 16 other agencies, including the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and the Department of Homeland Security.
The new rules allow employees doing intelligence work for those agencies to sift through raw data collected under a broad, Reagan-era executive order that gives the NSA virtually unlimited authority to intercept communications abroad. Previously, NSA analysts would filter out information they deemed irrelevant and mask the names of innocent Americans before passing it along.
The change was in the works long before there was any expectation that someone like Trump might become president. The last-minute adoption of the procedures is one of many examples of the Obama administration making new executive powers established by the Bush administration permanent, on the assumption that the executive branch could be trusted to police itself.
Could a reason be because anything left of "moderate" in the EU is crushed?
Oh wow; that critique of the use of volk. Choosing to interpret Streeck's Marktvolk as "rootless cosmopolitans" is rather a low blow. In distinguishing Marktvolk & Staatsvolk, Streeck is IMO seeking to differentiate the two constituencies of neoliberal political elites and the imbalance of power between debtor and creditors.
Adam Tooze’s outpouring is material for a future anatomy of the class rhetoric of faux cosmopolitanism as it flourishes among a soul-searching urban-academic middle class in the post-Brexit moment.
Where it gets really dirty, however, is where he blows up my innocent analytical distinction between ‘the people of the state’ and ‘the people of the market’ into an essentialist, racist, implicitly anti-Semitic conceptualisation of politics and political economy. The relevant passages in my book are devoted to explicating two competing pressures on democratic politics in an age of high debt: pressures from the owners of passports commanding a right to vote (Staatsvolk), and from the owners of bonds and movable capital commanding a right to sell (Marktvolk). I say nothing about how the two are constituted, except to mention that voting rights are national and selling rights international (which is so).
And it doesn't say who drew it up and on what basis. Which, i think, is why it was pretty much ignored.I don't trust that chart for a second. Everyone is practically Hitler on it, which is a bit silly.
Any chart which has France as the most left wing and among the least authoritarian EU countries is flawed. You do see that, don't you?Could a reason be because anything left of "moderate" in the EU is crushed?
I don't trust that chart for a second. Everyone is practically Hitler on it, which is a bit silly.
Well France's current government is of the Left if rather unpopular and almost certain to be replaced by a right wing one. It also has a dense social state that's still supported by most folk. But its under a state of emergency which I would think would bump it up the chart.Any chart which has France as the most left wing and among the least authoritarian EU countries is flawed. You do see that, don't you?
This, in the new Socialist Register seems to be IT right now:Has Reed written anything post-election results? I had a brief look around last night and couldn't find anything.
As the intellectual left moved both into the academy and away from an intellectual and epistemic commitment to class struggle, it by and large gave up the goal of radical social transformation and the objective of pursuing political power for the purpose of realizing that goal became less distinct from liberalism. Such a left, as Russell Jacoby notes, ‘ineluctably retreats to smaller ideas, seeking to expand the options within the existing society’. Militant embrace of the discourses of identity politics, most notably antiracism, has helped to sustain an appearance that the left is not in retreat but remains on the cutting edge of transformational politics. That is because of the prominence of a view that construes ‘oppressions’ rooted in race and gender, etc., as both foundational to American society – or the West – and so deeply embedded that most whites/men are in denial about their power. From that perspective the civil rights movement’s legislative victories in the 1960s were superficial and could not address the deep-structural sources of racism and sexism, which are effectively ontological and therefore beyond the reach of normal political or social intervention. Thus the struggle against these sources of inequality is always insurgent because their power never diminishes.