Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump, the road that might not lead to the White House!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The person with the 88 and the cross (and the numerous other links to white supremacist bullshit) actually claims to be native american.

There are some racial supremacist thoughts in some native communities, mostly among the young and disaffected, but somehow I doubt she has a tribal id number.
 
There are some racial supremacist thoughts in some native communities, mostly among the young and disaffected, but somehow I doubt she has a tribal id number.
Don't know about that but she claims:

Go ahead and Google Ramapough Lenape, better yet look up the Facebook page and my maiden name being MANN. Look at the tribal leaders last names being MANN vandunk defrost and on all family members, continue to call me a liar over the internet.
 
Is anyone else buying this theory that when/if he gets the nomination, let alone the presidency, he will completely change his tune?
 
Apparently this is a portrait that Trump commissioned, which hangs in his Florida residence.

I'm warming to him.

943807_795738697199438_1149753189689682549_n.jpg
Fingers are too big.
 
Is anyone else buying this theory that when/if he gets the nomination, let alone the presidency, he will completely change his tune?

I would be amazed if he didn't; he is already the least right-wing Republican front-runner of the past twenty years.
 
It (the equal-armed, circled cross) is quite widespread in right-wing iconography. It's not helped by the fact of a current of "Celtic Nationalism" (yes, they really are that stupid) in the Euro and US right alongside the "Germanic Nationalism" that fuels all those fuckwitted hard-right "Norse Heathens"/Odinists that are a "thing" in Europe and North America.
Always sad when iconography gets appropriated by fuckwads. :(

Are they out for vengeance on those bastard Romans then?
 
I would be amazed if he didn't; he is already the least right-wing Republican front-runner of the past twenty years.
Yes. He's a billionaire, racist, trade protectionist.....yet anti-Iraq war & anti defunding Planned Parenthood non-abortion activities & not a crazed christian crazy or a slave to Israel. The Repub establishment doesn't know how to handle him since they can't control him with money.
 
Is anyone else buying this theory that when/if he gets the nomination, let alone the presidency, he will completely change his tune?

Not the first time, media pundits have attempted to calm the horses with a bit of wishful thnking:
The New York Times' first article about Hitler's rise is absolutely stunning

"A sophisticated politician credited Hitler with peculiar political cleverness for laying emphasis and over-emphasis on anti-Semitism, saying: "You can't expect the masses to understand or appreciate your finer real aims. You must feed the masses with cruder morsels and ideas like anti-Semitism. It would be politically all wrong to tell them the truth about where you really are leading them."" New York Times 21/11/1922

But when you get a Caesar who has built their power base coming up with scapegoats that are thwarting the bread and circuses, when things don't go as well as imagined (as always happens) somebody has to be thrown to the lions.
 
Last edited:
Nah, will stick around for the sake of party unity, do a half arsed job and then breathe a sign of relief if Trump loses. But actually jump ship, can't see it

Some very cutting lines from the very conservative Brooks here http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/18/opinion/no-not-trump-not-ever.html?partner=IFTTT&_r=0

A lot of establishment Republicans are going to jump ship to Clinton I think.

It is difficult to see what they would do; you would think they would just do what gosub describes - but then again having this on their CV (if he does win the nomination) would utterly and permanently discredit almost all of them, people could perhaps continue on as strategists / insiders / whatever after losing a Presidential race or two, but losing their own race so badly that they have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to come in a distant third?

Perhaps some kind of laughably desperate stunt can be expected from them between now and the election.
 
The Republican Party has been falling apart since Bush. It's been really obvious for years and I have kept waiting to see who might try to drag it back, and it turns out that the answer is "nobody"; some people leave, others just play to the factions for their own political advantage as they see it, in the process proving themselves to be the sort of self serving politicians people hate. It's a bit late for them to start being concerned now.
 
Why on earth would they impeach Cruz?

Because everyone who is part of the GOP machine hates him. Bear in mind that if he were successfully impeached all that would happen is his VP would take over. If he somehow wins the nomination he's going to have to lean on the GOP network for help and I think part of his overtures towards them will be picking someone they favor as VP. My guess at this point would be someone like Condi Rice - a minority woman who can bring funding and the who the public know.

During the same question-and-answer session in Florida, Mr. Boehner referred to Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, another Republican presidential candidate, as “Lucifer.”

Mr. Boehner has previously called the senator, who led a failed Republican effort to shut down the government over the Affordable Care Act, a “jackass.”

John Boehner backs Paul Ryan for president, calls Ted Cruz ‘Lucifer’

WASHINGTON — A group of Senate Republicans, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), railed against Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) at a private luncheon on Wednesday, according to The New York Times, which cited two unnamed people who were present.

At that point, McConnell, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and others joined in lashing Cruz, leader of the anti-Obamacare showdown that spiraled into the government shutdown. “It just started a lynch mob,” one senator told the Times.

“I just don’t like the guy,” (GW) Bush said Sunday night, according to conversations with more than half a dozen donors who attended the event.

One donor in the room said the former president had been offering mostly anodyne accounts of how the Bush family network views the current campaign and charming off-the-cuff jokes, until he launched into Cruz.

“I was like, ‘Holy sh-t, did he just say that?’” the donor said. “I remember looking around and seeing that other people were also looking around surprised.”

..
“The tenor of what he said about the other candidates was really pretty pleasant,” another donor said. “Until he got to Cruz.”
George W. Bush unleashes on Ted Cruz

A prominent aide to George W. Bush's 2000 campaign could barely contain himself when we asked him to discuss Cruz, who worked in the campaign's policy shop. This person described Cruz as hyper-arrogant and widely despised, and he emphasized—over and over—that the pervasive dislike of Cruz within the Bush ranks had nothing to do with ideology. (Cruz, he noted, never objected to Bush's call for compassionate conservatism, immigration reform, and national education standards, and no one on the campaign regarded him as an ideologue.) The problem was simple: his personality.

Is Ted Cruz really an awful, terrible jerk?

“I think the short answer is because everybody who knows him in the Senate, hates him. And I think hate is not, is not an exaggeration. The enmity which he wears on his sleeve as, with pride, is something that he’s now, you could almost say cultivated. To make him a freshman senator with no particular record into a national figure rallying everybody against the Washington cartel, you know Republicans in the Senate, in the House have been out there half of their lives, don’t appreciate being called essentially traitors to the cause of conservatism. And then you get antipathy and they will put that antipathy perhaps even over what’s best for the party.”

The Other Reason The Washington Elite Hate Ted Cruz
 
Lion Guard <shakes fist at screen>

"The Lion Guard is a call to put the words “Make America Great Again” into action and aid Trump’s security and show our adversaries we are disciplined, perceptive, and watching."

LION GUARD IS BORN
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/u...n-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1

Republican leaders adamantly opposed to Donald J. Trump’s candidacy are preparing a 100-day campaign to deny him the presidential nomination, starting with an aggressive battle in Wisconsin’s April 5 primary and extending into the summer, with a delegate-by-delegate lobbying effort that would cast Mr. Trump as a calamitous choice for the general election.

Recognizing that Mr. Trump has seized a formidable advantage in the race, they say that an effort to block him would rely on an array of desperation measures, the political equivalent of guerrilla fighting.

There is no longer room for error or delay, the anti-Trump forces say, and without a flawlessly executed plan of attack, he could well become unstoppable.

But should that effort falter, leading conservatives are prepared to field an independent candidate in the general election, to defend Republican principles and offer traditional conservatives an alternative to Mr. Trump’s hard-edged populism. They described their plans in interviews after Mr. Trump’s victories last Tuesday in Florida and three other states.

Running a third party candidate would be kind of incredible.
 

And stupid, really. They're obsessed with fighting Trump as Trump. They neither know nor care about where his supporters are coming from. Probably because they're the result of years of Republican involvement in fear mongering, bigotry and economic indifference to a large portion of Americans. Their independent will end up in the same place as Jeb and Rubio, fucked off as another tepid version of the division and anger people think Trump does best.
 
Lion Guard <shakes fist at screen>

"The Lion Guard is a call to put the words “Make America Great Again” into action and aid Trump’s security and show our adversaries we are disciplined, perceptive, and watching."

LION GUARD IS BORN
Lion Guard
MARCH 16, 2016 AT 12:42 AM -"Lions Guard does not support confrontation and brawling. There is no need to escalate into fights as long as the forces of order uphold the law against these marauders. Find these braggarts online, expose them to fellow Trump followers, and if you see them in a rally inform security. The Secret Service and Trump’s security is well paid to handle these threats once exposed."

If they merely do that, then on balance probably a good thing, coz Trump has shown no interest in de-escalating things, and the way things are going it won't be long before someone gets killed.

However, an America where dissenting voices are intolarable isn't on a path to "Greatness"
 
"The movement to take our country back is getting stronger"

Back? Back from where?
That's the beauty of the message, everyone gets to transpose their own meaning as to who it's being taken back from - the liberals, the immigrants, the PC police, the gays, the bankers, the establishment...

Same goes for making America great.

People are pissed off at the current state of affairs for a variety of reasons, and this allows them all to vent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom