are you not 'feeling the bern'?
but it would require a degree of immiseration that no man or woman should have to bear.There's more revolutionary potential in a Trump presidency than a wet liberal Sanders one which will just depress and demotivated.
The worse, the better. As Lenin taught us.There's more revolutionary potential in a Trump presidency than a wet liberal Sanders one which will just depress and demotivated.
Probably. It's one thing to say he is better than Cruz and Rubio and that the most extreme of the liberal hysteria is wrong because he isn't literally Hitler but at the same time he *is* horrifying in his own right on so many levels. He *is* a racist demagogue who is redirecting the class anxiety of the US white working-class, he is a misogynist, he would undo a lot of the positive incremental change of the Obama Whitehouse on social issues and accelerate privatisation and attacks on workers' rights.
And he wants to bring in torture 'much stronger than waterboarding'. Since Bush II and his cronies, torture seems to be an openly republican value. It's fairly terrifying that a racist, misogynist bully who proposes extreme torture, mass deportation, electronic databases for minorities and a whole host of fascistic policies is able to tap into the American zeitgeist the way that Trump has. The sign of sick, sick country.
“One of the things I’m gonna do if I win... is I’m gonna open up our libel laws so when [newspapers] write purposely negative stories... we can sue them and make lots of money... So when the New York Times or the Washington post writes a hit piece, we can sue them.
“With me they’re not protected because I’m not like other people...So we’re going to open up those libel laws, folks, and we’re gonna have people sue you like you’ve never been sued before.”
Noam Chomsky, the renowned scholar and MIT professor emeritus, says that the rise of Donald Trump in American politics is, in part, fueled by deeply rooted fear and hopelessness that may be caused by an alarming spike in mortality rates for a generation of poorly educated whites.
“He’s evidently appealing to deep feelings of anger, fear, frustration, hopelessness, probably among sectors like those that are seeing an increase in mortality, something unheard of apart from war and catastrophe," Chomsky told The Huffington Post in an interview on Thursday. ...
A legion of less educated, working-class white men has fueled Trump’s rise. And while many say the business mogul is capitalizing on their fears about the perceived decline of white dominance in America, Chomsky says there may also be more existential forces at play.
Life expectancy, in general, has increased steadily over time. And thanks largely toadvances in health care, many people around the world live longer lives. There are exceptions, of course -- during war or natural catastrophes, for example. But what’s happening now in America, he says, is “quite different.”
Despite vast wealth and modern medicine, the U.S. has lower average life expectancy than many other nations. And while the average has been increasing recently, the gains are not evenly spread out. Wealthier Americans are living longer lives, while the poor are living shorter ones.
How America Made Donald Trump Unstoppable - I really recommend this article, absolutely essential reading for understanding Trump's momentum.
We can quibble over "every" (and what actual advances Obama has got through) but it'd be naive to think that Clinton will not attack the working-class, both in the US and outside it. Her, and her husbands, record(s) show that she did time and again in the past and to think that it will be different in the future is to be purposely blind.Yep, this. People probably thought Reagan was a bit of a joke and an idiot in 1979, but he did an enormous amount of damage in his 8 years. Clinton is vile, but she isn't going to set about undoing every minor advance Obama's got through.
What is there to attack? Reagan had a whole post-war settlement to take down. She will have nothing - not a comment on her but on the previous president and legislative program. It's so weak that she, a dedicated supporter of the worst sort of voracious domestic and international capital doesn't have to lift a finger to oppose it.Yep, this. People probably thought Reagan was a bit of a joke and an idiot in 1979, but he did an enormous amount of damage in his 8 years. Clinton is vile, but she isn't going to set about undoing every minor advance Obama's got through.
Excellent link to posts off some nothing forum.This guy reckons both Cruz and Rubio are constitutionally ineligible:
Single Post Display - The Market Ticker
Oh Oh...
What Are The Rules of Evidence?
And he wants to bring in torture 'much stronger than waterboarding'. Since Bush II and his cronies, torture seems to be an openly republican value. It's fairly terrifying that a racist, misogynist bully who proposes extreme torture, mass deportation, electronic databases for minorities and a whole host of fascistic policies is able to tap into the American zeitgeist the way that Trump has. The sign of sick, sick country.
Having watched the 25/2/16 debate, based on this alone, Trump appeared more left wing than any of the other candidates.
On immigration Trump (& Rubio as it happens) would grant amnesty for some of the illegal immigrants they deported, Cruz wouldn't.
Trump was accused of cutting deals with Democrats, which he agreed with,adding he gets on with everyone! He was also accused by Rubio of being not conservative enough.
Trump said he would try & mediate for peace re Israel & Palestine. None of the others said they would - they would just support Israel.
Whilst not being a proponent, Trump acknowledged state healthcare had worked in a couple of countries, none acknowledged this.
I think the other candidates managed that just fine on their own.☺Your really trying to polish a turd
Christie ducks out and calls for Trump. Ohhh dear
US election 2016: Christie endorses Trump in shock move - BBC News
Having watched the 25/2/16 debate, based on this alone, Trump appeared more left wing than any of the other candidates.
On immigration Trump (& Rubio as it happens) would grant amnesty for some of the illegal immigrants they deported, Cruz wouldn't.
Trump was accused of cutting deals with Democrats, which he agreed with,adding he gets on with everyone! He was also accused by Rubio of being not conservative enough.
Trump said he would try & mediate for peace re Israel & Palestine. None of the others said they would - they would just support Israel.
Whilst not being a proponent, Trump acknowledged state healthcare had worked in a couple of countries, none acknowledged this.