J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
As far as I can tell from reporting it means mentioned. Why does it really matter how the information was presented?
Donald Trump, the road that might not lead to the White House!
- Thread starter weltweit
- Start date
- Status
As far as I can tell from reporting it means mentioned. Why does it really matter how the information was presented?
You are asking me to prove a negative: but it's already established that Trump's lawyer was never in Prague, as I pointed out in several earlier posts, which you seem to be ignoring
Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
No, I'm not. Faking, making something up is an act in itself. Someone did it. It's an event. You think that event happened.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
I didn't mention how it was presented. I mean what other stuff do they brief on and what does that contain - a mass file of crap or what? And so, if just mentioned, then so what. I don't get what you're driving at here.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
To report on that is fake news. Or MSM or accurate news. I forget how these types are used in each case.
Are you for fucking real? You can excuse spreading any type of gossip whatsoever this way.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
yeh, which is what the article you derided as garbage said too. NOW you agree with that, earlier you said it was crap. you're all over the shop on this one.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
OMG can someone help him here?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
he is beyond assistance.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
I'm not really driving at anything, all I mean is that it doesn't matter how it was presented or whether it was presented either on its own or alongside other things. All that is needed is for it to be mentioned and then it can be presented with more credibility by anyone who wants to leak what was mentioned.
gosub
~#
I think it would have more problematic if they had done it prior to the election, but yep should have been there 9/11/16.
J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
Wouldn't think that you were that bothered about abbreviated blasphemy...
Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
Sigh. I've already said I don't know if it's true and I've admitted that the report was commissioned for party political purposes. Now, let's try again: have you any evidence that it was made up?
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
it's just seeing butchersapron going 'omg' seems wrong.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
No jury would convict.
This flood of cretins over the last month - it feels like the 911 loon club all grown up now and dabbling their feet in actual politics, it's everywhere and it's nasty. I blame Corybn.
edit: not for this thread and cretin, not good.
bluescreen
tofu eating wokerati
squirrelp please take a deep breath and think about the difference between the allegations themselves and the stories about the allegations - who made them, and the uses to which they've been put. The public interest is in the meta story/ies.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you may be asking the impossible
CrabbedOne
Walking sideways snippily
CrabbedOne
Walking sideways snippily
On Background Briefing January 12 - Trump's CIA Nominee and His Boss's Battle With the Intelligence Community; A Leading Analyst of National Security and Executive Power; The Peculiar Symmetry on the Left and Right in Excusing Trump and Putin
A Podcast.
Ian Masters has Bob Baer on formerly of the CIA's Beirut Station. Baer points out it's an open secret that the FSB routinely film everything and everybody in the Russian hotels Trump used. I'd assume Trump must be well aware of that. He has his own security people after all. He's a very rash man but it seems an oddly insecure venue to pick for perverted sex acts. Baer thinks the Russian will only produce such "secret" material if Trump really offends them. Trump's trying dreadfully hard not to tweak Putin's tale while winding up the Chinese at every opportunity. It's very odd almost incriminating behaviour but then he's a very odd man.
Then David Rothkopf CEO of FP who sees Trump's position as rather insecure. Not least because the Republican establishment and perhaps most Republican voters would prefer a Pence Presidency. There's little sign of Trump communicating much with his policy team. Tillerson and the others often take different positions. Trump's behaving exactly how you'd expect a guy used to running a wealthy but fairly small family firm via his fawning entourage not a huge bureaucracy.
A Podcast.
Ian Masters has Bob Baer on formerly of the CIA's Beirut Station. Baer points out it's an open secret that the FSB routinely film everything and everybody in the Russian hotels Trump used. I'd assume Trump must be well aware of that. He has his own security people after all. He's a very rash man but it seems an oddly insecure venue to pick for perverted sex acts. Baer thinks the Russian will only produce such "secret" material if Trump really offends them. Trump's trying dreadfully hard not to tweak Putin's tale while winding up the Chinese at every opportunity. It's very odd almost incriminating behaviour but then he's a very odd man.
Then David Rothkopf CEO of FP who sees Trump's position as rather insecure. Not least because the Republican establishment and perhaps most Republican voters would prefer a Pence Presidency. There's little sign of Trump communicating much with his policy team. Tillerson and the others often take different positions. Trump's behaving exactly how you'd expect a guy used to running a wealthy but fairly small family firm via his fawning entourage not a huge bureaucracy.
The US 'intelligence community' are known liars / con-artists, you name it. They call it 'psychological operations'.
It's in the public interest that our journalists question their pronouncements or gossip-spreading to the hilt, alas this doesn't happen.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
You don't know what journalism is. Yet you think you can differentiate between one style and another then pin truth to one? You dangerous authoritarian joker.
andysays
Love and solidarity
It stands for Private, obviously, but once they're numerous you're allowed, even expected, to mention them.
(as an aside, who was it who first used that classic phrase "numerous PMs of support"?)
Backatcha Bandit
is not taking your calls
J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
Trump’s rhetoric: a triumph of inarticulacy
The funny thing about this article is that a lot of the things they identify as inarticulacy and unique to Trump are things I have noted as being popular with US liberals.
The funny thing about this article is that a lot of the things they identify as inarticulacy and unique to Trump are things I have noted as being popular with US liberals.
andysays
Love and solidarity
That example is way before my time, but it appears to be being referred to, even in 2006, as a phrase already in established usage.
Maybe I should test out the search function's capabilities...
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
i tried a couple of other searches but while the principle was definitely there i can't find an earlier example of 'pms of support'. tbh the search function leaves something to be desired because you can't search by phrase. searching for 'pms support' then means that as long as the two words are in a post a result's returned, even when they aren't in any way adjacent.
Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
Apparently they were also popular with the people who voted for Trump. I'm not sure of the correct appellation for them - what is the opposite of 'liberal' these days?
J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
Russian stooge? Racist? White trash?
- Status
Similar threads
