Donald Trump, the road that might not lead to the White House!
- Thread starter weltweit
- Start date
- Status
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
yeh, peculiarly so.
LDC
On est tous des pangolins
It's a gift for the conspiracy (small) minded innit.
Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
Thanks for this valuable resource. The whole urban community is in your debt.
I refer you to the Craig Murray article linked to earlier which outlines many reasons for considering it a work of fiction
The Steele Dossier or the Hitler Diaries Mark II - Craig Murray
and in particular the ALREADY disproven claim that Michael Cohen, Trump's lawyer, was involved in a meeting in Prague
Witnesses say Michael Cohen was not in Prague for Kremlin meeting following passport tweet | Daily Mail Online
Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
In some ways I think urban's discussions of Trump need to move on. There's been a long corrective going on, entirely necessary in my view, against those who invested liberal and 'progressive' hopes in Clinton. Those people were wrong and the Democrats were even more wrong with their abandonment of the working class and of whole communities. But... it's Trump. Whatever madness arises from his 'unpresidential' personality and psychopathy, there's going to be an intensified agenda of deregulation and inequality.
Backatcha Bandit
is not taking your calls
This thread is like a 467 page argument in favour of sortition.
Trump conducts his own sting operation to ensnare intelligence briefers | Daily Mail Online
Anyone catch this anywhere other than the Mail?
Trump conducts his own sting operation to ensnare intelligence briefers | Daily Mail Online
Anyone catch this anywhere other than the Mail?
mikey mikey
Active Member
I just love Xmas trees. But I only mentioned my five generously given likes because I had been told that it was "fact" I had posted nothing of any worth on this thread.
OTOH you seem to be contributing Xmas trees.
Good for you.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you have posted nothing of any worth on this thread.
5 likes to show for 89 posts isn't really indicative of quality contributions.
mikey mikey
Active Member
One or two. But the P in PM stands for...
not-bono-ever
meh
All this
As I mentioned (then deleted as is my SOP on this thread) , This is more James Wormald than Peter Wright, but even Wormalds vacuum cleaner based reports were based on nuggets of known and verifiable information. the joining up of these nuggets into a dossier made them if not wholly credible, at least had enough truth in them to ensure they could not be dismissed out of hand. Much of the joining up stuff is never likely to be disproven in public.
As I mentioned (then deleted as is my SOP on this thread) , This is more James Wormald than Peter Wright, but even Wormalds vacuum cleaner based reports were based on nuggets of known and verifiable information. the joining up of these nuggets into a dossier made them if not wholly credible, at least had enough truth in them to ensure they could not be dismissed out of hand. Much of the joining up stuff is never likely to be disproven in public.
mikey mikey
Active Member
5 is not nothing.
"Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once" said Pickman
mikey mikey
Active Member
Yes.
not-bono-ever
meh
Successful SIS operatives usually relish placing a flourish in their report writings - this can make or break the reception of their work*. It is no surprise that imagination assists in an industry that likes itself to be portrayed as drone like civil servicery. Where the boundary exists between fact and supposition is one to carefully tread if yer job depends upon it
* this is why I could never be one of them. and the drug habit and record of random violence obviously.
* this is why I could never be one of them. and the drug habit and record of random violence obviously.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
five likes is not indicative of quality of content.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
mikey mikey
Active Member
Yes. Of course.
not-bono-ever
meh
Shaub is out on his spotty arse anyway in a few days isn't he ?
I don't really know what you are waiting for. The propagandists are tying themselves in knots because Trump's lawyer was never where they claimed he was, and it's like you are asking to me disprove the claim that the dog ate someone's else's homework because it was muddled
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Isn't you talking about this going on 'fake news' under your definition?
Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
Trump's conflicts of interest will remain, though.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
no, it's like i'm asking you to say which parts of the article you disagree with.
not-bono-ever
meh
Depends who he appoints to that role obvs- Coi now may nor be considered Coi in a few months time
I disagree with the implication that there is any truth in the original story: of course I don't need to disagree with the admission that a central tenet of the story is untrue.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
that being the case i am at a loss to see why you described the article i linked to as garbage.
Why? If you tell me the dog ate your homework and I prove that you never had a dog how should I treat your refined claim that the chicken ate your homework?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Well, you certainly can't talk about it because that would be 'fake news' - under your logic.
So, why are you peddling fake news?
- Status
Similar threads
