krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
View attachment 95278
No, he's your President Elect. No wonder you voted a cunt in to power if you can't grasp the basics.
Sneery
View attachment 95278
No, he's your President Elect. No wonder you voted a cunt in to power if you can't grasp the basics.
Doesn't your avatar already scream "glamour"?
The worse, the better, as Lenin taught us.Here's my predict, Trump's outlined policies on economics put him in direct line to trade war with China, even if that doesn't happen, his plans for wealth tax cuts, financial deregulation will lead America directly into a recession. When that happens he'll blame immigrants and foreign governments for ruining the economy, that'll increase racist tension, which seeing as he's stated he'll bring back stop and frisk and he supports blue livesmatter will stoke up the right. And keep in mind this isn't the UK, those racists over in america have guns.
I think it's going to get incredibly ugly very fast.
The worse, the better, as Lenin taught us.
OH GOD.
the majority of Trump voters make between $100,000 and $250,000 + just saying.
I think you're probably right.there is literally no point in continuing this chat,
That uncomfortable fact that Trump won amongst white college graduates really does show that something is wrong with the explanation that is all about class, doesn't it?According to this article, the common factor amongst Trump voters was white identity.
Exit polls: a broad range of white people voted Trump for president
According to this article, the common factor amongst Trump voters was white identity.
Exit polls: a broad range of white people voted Trump for president
It's mostly white men isn't it, that voted for him. White men whose jobs were taken away and given outside the US, for economic reasons.
Dig down deeper in the data, and you’ll see that Trump had a broad collation of white support. Nearly half, 49 percent, of white college graduates — who typically aren’t considered “working class” — voted for Trump.
And what about white women? Leading up to the election, many pollsters and pundits speculated that white women were shying away from Trump, especially in light of revelations that he once bragged about groping women without their consent.
Well, again, nearly half — 45 percent — of college-educated white women voted for Trump. That figure was 62 percent for non-college-educated white women.
because obviously everyone who goes to college is educated, so they can't do dumb thingsThat uncomfortable fact that Trump won amongst white college graduates really does show that something is wrong with the explanation that is all about class, doesn't it?
Depends where you are reading the stats really. I just saw something that detailed his voter template as White, rural and religious. What is clear across all the things I had seen though is that his voters were mainly men and he did far better with White, colleged educated men and women than anyone expected.
But ultimately, Donald Trump’s election victory was owed in large part to marshalling a share of the white vote not seen in a generation.
Trump computed 63 per cent among white men, according to CNN, with some of the best showings for men without a college education. He attracted a larger share of the white evangelical voters than an actual born-again Christian. According to Washington Post exit polls, 81 per cent of evangelicals sided with Trump — more than the 79 per cent they gave in 2004 to George W. Bush, himself an evangelical Christian.
And, perhaps most surprising, Trump claimed a majority of white women voters. According to CNN’s exit polls, roughly 53 per cent of white women voters went with Trump, while other polls had the ratio as high as 60 per cent.
Instead, as a writer for Quartz put it, “this election wasn’t lost to the men in their country; it was lost—and this is where it hurts the most—to the women, too.”
But only the white women. Women in general voted 54 per cent for Hillary Clinton, according to New York Times exit polls. But the lead was owed to black and Hispanic women flocking to the Democrats at rates of 80 to 90 per cent.
Thanks for that. However since you seem to be of the opinion that GWB's No Child Left Behind Act was a 'good thing' I think we can all safely disregard your opinion on any issue related to American politics because you're either an idiot, a bullshitter or [most likely] both.Here's my predict...
For the majority the recession/depression of 2008 never really ended. But otherwise, you've got a point. Damn you.Yeah, there's enough white supremists out there embolded by Trump's victory, and angry AA who's lot is about to get much much worse, add in a recession if not a full blown world economic crash and you have a reciepe for a race war. I'll dig up the quote but Trump literally said he wants rioting in the streets in a 2014 interview.
And I'm sorry if anyone thinks Trump won't bring about a recession there is literally no point in continuing this chat,
Thanks for that. However since you seem to be of the opinion that GWB's No Child Left Behind Act was a 'good thing' I think we can all safely disregard your opinion on any issue related to American politics because you're either an idiot, a bullshitter or [most likely] both.
Fuck sake, did he actually say that?Thanks for that. However since you seem to be of the opinion that GWB's No Child Left Behind Act was a 'good thing' I think we can all safely disregard your opinion on any issue related to American politics because you're either an idiot, a bullshitter or [most likely] both.
Fuck sake, did he actually say that?
I'm proud to be intolerant of violent sexual predators and psychotic racist bullies thanks.
DT seemed a bit slurry when he started his speech, I thought maybe the kid had imbibed as well, he looked like he was going to chunder or collapse.
Can you qualify that?Thanks for that. However since you seem to be of the opinion that GWB's No Child Left Behind Act was a 'good thing' I think we can all safely disregard your opinion on any issue related to American politics because you're either an idiot, a bullshitter or [most likely] both.
Can you qualify that?
no, it doesn't suggest anything of the sort. bookies' odds are affected by where the money goes, so a load of money on clinton means shorter odds on her.Isn't the right way to interpret that to say that slightly more people think a 1/3 bet on the Dems is better value than a 3/1 bet on the Reps? Ignoring the independents and seeing this as a two-horse race, those are quite short odds for the favourite. Also, assuming the numbers reflect the sizes of bets, the bookies look set to lose a lot if Trump wins. That suggests that the bookies themselves have a high level of confidence in a Clinton win.
Sorry, could somebody explain to me what No Child Left Behind Act was, please? I don't understand the wiki entry.
It's a failed Bush education policy. Out of curiosity I searched my user name and the act and I don't think I've ever talked about, it's a bizarre accusation to make.
lots of people called it right, you just weren't listening.No he's talking complete fucking shit.
Anyway on to actual issues. Depressingly, it appears, that Michael Moore was on the money,
5 Reasons Why Trump Will Win
lots of people called it right, you just weren't listening.