Casually Red
tomorrow belongs to me
jesus casually red - enough with the fucking misogyny. its bang out of order.
What misogyny ?
jesus casually red - enough with the fucking misogyny. its bang out of order.
If you're referring to what you posted upthread as "taking the piss out of Clinton", you will note that none of the responses have referred to your insinuations about her, but instead to the misogyny you display by using offensive, sexualised imagery of a woman in order to support what passes for your argument.The Donald Trump I've continually mocked and insulted throughout this thread ? Called everything from a buffoon to a c**t ?
Taking the piss out of Clinton in the exact same manner sees these clowns immediately go off on one . serfs .
JesusWhat misogyny ?
If you're referring to what you posted upthread as "taking the piss out of Clinton", you will note that none of the responses have referred to your insinuations about her, but instead to the misogyny you display by using offensive, sexualised imagery of a woman in order to support what passes for your argument.
The fact that you have to make such desperate - and blatant - attempts to misrepresent others also says rather a lot about you...
So you don't think a crudely-assembled image of a woman in knickers wiggling her arse around is in any way sexualised or misogynistic?Where exactly is the sexualised aspect of it ? Being an asskisser isn't a sexual insult . It's nothing more than a pathetic groveller to the powerful. I shouldn't need to explain that to you off all people. You can't lack that level of self awareness . Renfield .
Or is it Igor ?
So you don't think a crudely-assembled image of a woman in knickers wiggling her arse around is in any way sexualised or misogynistic?
That level of naivety explains a few things. Maybe you'll understand better when you've spent a bit more of your time around adults.
Fuck me, it's an image posted by Casually Red that doesn't refer to Clinton or crudely impugn some kind of sexual context to everything she does!
evil bitch. witch. whore. look at her fat old arse .. etc etc etc.
Nope no misogyny here. no siree. Are you incapable of criticizing Hilary Clinton without bringing her gender into it? And can you really not see what the problem with that is?
Heres a clue - what would you think if someone slagged off obama by continuingly bringing his skin colour into it and using epithets like "nigger"?
Go and fuck yourself you lying piece of shit. Shows how low the likes of you will stoop .
Does anyone know German who can translate this headline?
View attachment 94017
A thoroughly trump-esque response there. Well done. Have a tic tac.
I distinctly remember you calling her a shrieking mad bitch on the Syria thread.You're a lying pie e of shit . I've never called her a bitch , much less a whore
Financial inequality is one of the biggest political issues of our time: from the Wall Street bailouts to the rise of the One Percent, who between them control forty-percent of the US wealth. So where are the Democrats - the notional 'party of the people' in all of this? Author Thomas Frank will examine how the Left in America has abandoned its roots to pursue a new supporter - elite professionals - and how this unprecedented shift away from its working-class roots ultimately deepens the rift between the rich and poor in the US.
Thomas Frank is an author and former columnist for The Wall Street Journal and Harper's, and the founding editor of The Blaffer. His latest book is Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?
During the winter and spring of 1861, political tension and fear gripped Missouri. Slaveholding planters in the countryside eagerly wished to join the seven seceding states of the Deep South. Workers in cities like St Louis stood in opposition.
Advocates from both sides argued their case in print and in public. Conservative newspapers warned Missouri’s citizens to beware of heeding the advice of “scarlet red speakers.” Slaveholders denounced abolitionists, immigrants, and activists as “Pure red republicans! People rotten from the ground up, red all the way through to their kidneys.”
In the meantime, the city’s Unionists armed to prevent the secession of the state. Progressive Republicans, soldiers, and the German immigrant community took the lead. Revolutionary veterans from Europe, including such radicals as Heinrich Börnstein, editor of St Louis’s German-language newspaper Anzeiger des Westens, played a prominent role in helping to organize the new Union volunteers.
On May 10, 1861, the loyal regiments marched to the outskirts of town where they dispersed and disarmed a gathering of secessionist militias. As the victorious units marched their captives back through the city, radical journalists likened the scene to the revolutions that had swept Europe in 1848. “It was one of those splendid moments,” wrote one, “when emotion glowing deep in the heart of the masses suddenly breaks into wild flame.” The defeated Confederate sympathizers proved less enthusiastic. “These reds and forty-eighters are to blame for everything,” remarked one conservative editor.
These admonishments sound as if they might have come directly from the “red scares” of the twentieth century, but in this case they spoke directly to some of the key issues at stake in the ensuing Civil War. Though little recalled today, in the years before the Civil War Americans debated not only the future of slavery but also the future of free wage labor. Americans argued over the merits of socialism, communism, and the meaning of the revolutions that had swept the Western world during the preceding century.
That's because we're calling you out on the misogyny you are displaying right here on this thread, not scouring the entire US political establishment for arguments that are not-Trump.Why not ask him .
Not only does he get an amnesty so do the people who dismiss his victims as liars . Which has been done repeatedly on this thread but not a single mention of sexism .
It must be very frustrating dealing with people who keep pointing out your idiocy, rather than letting you pretend it's normal and OK.You're a lying pie e of shit . I've never called her a bitch , much less a whore . And I've dealt earlier with the issue of my opinion of obamas fellow supporters calling him that other word.
So like I said go and fuck yourself you lying sack of shit .
That's because we're calling you out on the misogyny you are displaying right here on this thread, not scouring the entire US political establishment for arguments that are not-Trump.
That's rich coming from a lying bigoted hypocrite such as yourselfWaggling clintons arse in front of an arse kisser isn't misogyny. It's demonstrating your an arse kisser when it comes to our betters . Which you are . A massive one
Schluuuurrpp ..schluuurrpp
Bunch of fucking hypocrites must have been having kittens when thatcher carked it . Very quietly having kittens . No snooty misogyny lectures there . Just as there hasn't been a single misogyny lecture to all the other ass kissers on this thread dismissing Bill Clintons rape and abuse victims as liars . Hypocrisy . Of a very smug variety .
I sincerely hope you're getting your blood pressure checked regularly.Waggling clintons arse in front of an arse kisser isn't misogyny. It's demonstrating your an arse kisser when it comes to our betters . Which you are . A massive one
Schluuuurrpp ..schluuurrpp
Bunch of fucking hypocrites must have been having kittens when thatcher carked it . Very quietly having kittens . No snooty misogyny lectures there . Just as there hasn't been a single misogyny lecture to all the other ass kissers on this thread dismissing Bill Clintons rape and abuse victims as liars . Hypocrisy . Of a very smug variety .
Go away weirdo
What misogyny ?