Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump, the road that might not lead to the White House!

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's that sexism again.

I asked once before - I'll ask it again:

How culpable is Laura Bush for the Iraq war?

How culpable is Michelle Obama for drone strikes?

There's no sexism whatsoever. Your a liar, and exceptionally dense one .

Neither Michelle Obama nor Laura Bush were politicians, Hilllary Clinton is . She was personally responsible for legislation in that administration . Bill gave her the responsibility. They advertised themselves as 2 for one deal.

Here's it explained for you. Not that you'll even bother your arse reading it. She wielded executive power despite being unelected thanks to her husband who just gave it to her . She also wielded great influence over her husband .

Here, thicko. You sound like you only just heard of her.

Bill and Hillary's double trouble: Clinton's 'two for the price of
 
Yes. Because she's a proven warmonger with the neo con warmongering elite in her political stable. As opposed to an actual Bosnian sniper dodger .
I also believe her when she says her name is Hillary Clinton. I don't however believe her when she claims she was named after Edmund Hillary who climbed Everest. Because he didn't do that until 6 years after she was born .
Nor do I believe her when she currently claims to be 5 foot 7 . Because she was 5 foot five in 2008 and middle aged women dont get growth spurts .

And those are just wee lies she just can't help . She's a serial bullshitter about lots of very serious stuff. And a crook who just rigged her selection as a candidate . But that hasn't even caused liberals to blink. Nothing will. It's a cult . A very smug cult like fawning over a smug , murderous crook , warmonger and serial liar .
 
If you think that Hillary Clinton did not lead the 1993 effort then you should have a word with Clinton herself because she says she did.
She did indeed & I admire her for it. I happened to be in Seattle when she kicked of the campaign for it. She couldn't be heard because of the right wing wackos shouting her down & carrying signs calling her a communist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
I consider the pro-Trump argument centered around the effectiveness of both? No one has the capability (let alone will...) of HC to do her Republican-in-Disguise act and take congress etc with her. Trump will get nowhere. Half his party already hate him and he'll get nothing through congress. Just 4 years of facepalmery and inert fash/racist ranting. He'll also take the heat back off the UK at being the wallys of the world.
 
I consider the pro-Trump argument centered around the effectiveness of both? No one has the capability (let alone will...) of HC to do her Republican-in-Disguise act and take congress etc with her. Trump will get nowhere. Half his party already hate him and he'll get nothing through congress. Just 4 years of facepalmery and inert fash/racist ranting. He'll also take the heat back off the UK at being the wallys of the world.

That's pretty much how I see it too. Hillary can do things that Trump just can't. Like invade places for example. If Trump says "let's invade Egypt" everyone will say "oh fuck off, right-wing warmonger." But if Hillary says it everyone will go "oh she's a liberal so must be better than Trump who would obviously have invaded both Egypt and Tunisia, so I suppose we might as well avert our gaze and let her do her thing." I know how these people's minds work.
 
That would work too.

It would be a completely despicable thing to do, and it might well lead to Mexican families starving to death while their government wondered wtf to do, but if he's enough of a bastard to carry it through, it would work.

So he can build the wall without people going 'right wing asshole'; but if he tries to invade somewhere, they'll go 'right wing warmonger'?

Logical consistency seems to be in short supply here.



Actually, I call bullshit on Phil. He's too smart to actually believe what he's saying here. He's just trolling to try and drum up an argument.
 
Actually, I call bullshit on Phil. He's too smart to actually believe what he's saying here. He's just trolling to try and drum up an argument.

Perhaps you could point out the flaw in his plan?

Seems to me the only flaw is ethical, and that won't trouble him too much.
 
Perhaps you could point out the flaw in his plan?

Seems to me the only flaw is ethical, and that won't trouble him too much.

It implies that Mexico will have no alternative recourse or actions. Furthermore blocking guest worker visas will cripple, among other things, US Agriculture.

The plan forsees no mexican action other than capitulation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
It implies that Mexico will have no alternative recourse or actions. Furthermore blocking guest worker visas will cripple, among other things, US Agriculture.

The plan forsees no mexican action other than capitulation.

And capitulate is exactly what the current Mexican government would do. After noisy protests no doubt, but the PRI aren't about to get into a fight with the USA.

There would be no need to block any visas, simply threatening to require ID in order to wire money would do the job.
 
Trumps made clear umpteen times he rejects that entire way of thinking. Rejects confrontation with Russia also . That's not crazy. That's sanity . Unless one is either crazy or just plain stupid enough to believe Clinton and PNACs course can continue to be followed and somehow , this time., It won't be an unmitigated catastrophe . Because make no mistake about it once she's in a showdown with Moscow is on the cards . It'll be the big one, the definitive one . Don't doubt that for a minute .
Corruption is the least of her faults . Sociopathic warmongering is top of the list. And her body count and and the string of destroyed nations already under her belt makes her morally , spiritually and psychologically unfit for office.

I'm sorry, but being an isolationist doesn't necessarily translate into peace. His whole pattern of thinking (or not-thinking really) shows that he's just not suited to the job. If someone says something even slightly in disagreement with him, he takes to twitter and carpet bombs them in spite. I don't like to think what would happen if you pair such a petty personality with real weapons instead of metaphorical ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
It implies that Mexico will have no alternative recourse or actions. Furthermore blocking guest worker visas will cripple, among other things, US Agriculture.

The plan forsees no mexican action other than capitulation.

Vincente Fox already told him to go fuck himself (in those exact words). I seriously doubt if the current leadership in Mexico is going to react any better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
I consider the pro-Trump argument centered around the effectiveness of both? No one has the capability (let alone will...) of HC to do her Republican-in-Disguise act and take congress etc with her. Trump will get nowhere. Half his party already hate him and he'll get nothing through congress. Just 4 years of facepalmery and inert fash/racist ranting. He'll also take the heat back off the UK at being the wallys of the world.

That depends on who ends up taking the Senate. If the Republicans get the senate, he's stupid enough to sign anything they pass. If the Dems get the senate, then its likely you're correct. I know there's a lot of attention on the race for President, but the real race is in the House and Senate. Whoever end up in control of those, will control the next four years, not whoever is elected President.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
Vincente Fox already told him to go fuck himself (in those exact words). I seriously doubt if the current leadership in Mexico is going to react any better.

The current leadership in Mexico would be only too happy to do anything Trump says if it meant they could retain power.

The only hope is that a massive tide of popular outrage would force them to defy him.
 
The current leadership in Mexico would be only too happy to do anything Trump says if it meant they could retain power.

The only hope is that a massive tide of popular outrage would force them to defy him.

If I were a Mexican citizen, I'd be pretty outraged at the mere suggestion. Its been a long time since I was there, but they seemed to be just as proud of their country as Americans tend to be of ours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
And capitulate is exactly what the current Mexican government would do. After noisy protests no doubt, but the PRI aren't about to get into a fight with the USA.

There would be no need to block any visas, simply threatening to require ID in order to wire money would do the job.

No. Leaving aside that it's not the 1980s and there are a plethora of different ways to transfer money, Mexico is not going to undertake the logistics of of such a border wall, never mind the finance.

Even his own party says the wall is unworkable and as border runs through both private and public land. The only thing that the border wall if built will prevent is the migratory patterns of hundreds of species, with potentially tragic effect.
 
Last edited:
If I were a Mexican citizen, I'd be pretty outraged at the mere suggestion. Its been a long time since I was there, but they seemed to be just as proud of their country as Americans tend to be of ours.
on the positive side it might inhibit yanqui attempts to grab more of mexico than they already have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom