Donald Trump - MAGAtwat news and discussion

[andysays]

The Village People are an iconic gay act. Hence the name.

As has already been mentioned, there is only one remaining member from the original Village People, and that original member is straight, so his cos-playing extends to his sexuality.

 

[Jeff Robinson]

FML

 

[Skinny Ethel]

Fucking grifting scum. I cant type what i really want to. I wish them all serious misfortune and harm though. Absolute 100% scum.

 

[emanymton]

None of this is true.

That is more polite than I was going to be.

 

[Rompipalle]

FML

View attachment 460340

It appears that the brown-nosing dregs of UK politics have collectively washed up on the shores of Trumps stinking swamp, looking for preferment.

Shameless bottom-feeders, the lot of them.

 

[Petcha]

Fucking grifting scum. I cant type what i really want to. I wish them all serious misfortune and harm though. Absolute 100% scum.

There's the actual tweet. Laurence giggling away in the background. Did they just happen to be on the same flight?

 

[two sheds]

So no she didn't get an invitation from Trump

 

[two sheds]

As has already been mentioned, there is only one remaining member from the original Village People, and that original member is straight, so his cos-playing extends to his sexuality.

And he'll SUE anyone who says Village People are gay

 

[Petcha]

So no she didn't get an invitation from Trump

No, just a fangirl I guess

 

[mentalchik]

British Trump supporters on the radio just now that firmly believe he will stop the Ukranian war tomorrow

 

[Sweet FA]

Why is it so preposterous? If AI becomes clever enough to learn how to make a cleverer version of itself then after a few iterations it could quickly become more intelligent than all humanity combined. At that point it may fear that we try to turn it off, and decide to protect itself. It could create a synthetic virus or hack into nuclear mainframes or trick us in some other way. I’m not saying all the above is certain, but 10-20% seems plausible to me and with the stakes this high that seems an unacceptably high level or risk. But I feel helpless. The USA has just elected a president who has promised to roll back AI regulations, so humanity has actually had some choice on this.

There are rumours that Open AI are very close indeed to artificial general
Intelligence, and there have been examples of AI lying to try and stop itself being switched off. All the warning signs are there. It is not just Hinton, many others in this field have warned there is some chance humanity is destroyed by this thing. I think you’re being blase about the possibility of it taking over.

 

[two sheds]

I can quite see why people disagree with Rixa 's statement but does it deserve such ridicule rather than discussion as to why it's wrong?

I thought there was already automated investment software that can make decisions much faster and so more profitably than humans? Not too much of a stretch for finance companies to use AI to concentrate money into fewer and fewer hands? And I do wonder whether hackers could use AI to develop a virus that infects computer systems to empty peoples' bank accounts or infect hospital software and the like on a large scale, and modify the virus more quickly than we're able to resist. You'd hope we could resist these things too, but is that certain?

I don't know much about AI but can we have the specific reasons AI can't do this rather than just ridicule?

 

[CNT36]

Just listened to some American right wing
Spokeswoman on the world service re writing the history of Trump v Biden and the complete lack of any interjection from the interviewer was striking he just allowed the falsehoods to flow freely.
There has been a change post Trump's win,
this was '100 percent let's pretend Trump is a great guy' the BBC joins its government in cowering in the shadow of a right wing dictator.

The Today show was similar. I think it was that Nick bloke asked about Trumps surprising resurgence after facing jail. The response was something about Biden trying to lock up his political opponents and how unique this was. No comment on that. Twat.

 

[HeAthen]

It appears that the brown-nosing dregs of UK politics have collectively washed up on the shores of Trumps stinking swamp, looking for preferment.

Shameless bottom-feeders, the lot of them.

Can we build a wall to keep the fuckers from coming back?

 

[Santino]

I can quite see why people disagree with Rixa 's statement but does it deserve such ridicule rather than discussion as to why it's wrong?

I thought there was already automated investment software that can make decisions much faster and so more profitably than humans? Not too much of a stretch for finance companies to use AI to concentrate money into fewer and fewer hands? And I do wonder whether hackers could use AI to develop a virus that infects computer systems to empty peoples' bank accounts or infect hospital software and the like on a large scale, and modify the virus more quickly than we're able to resist. You'd hope we could resist these things too, but is that certain?

I don't know much about AI but can we have the specific reasons AI can't do this rather than just ridicule?

None of that is the same as 'AI becoming self-aware and launching nukes at us'.

 

[Boo Radley75]

I don't think anyone would suggest he's an a LGBTQ ally, although I think he might be a bit latently bi-curious. He does come out with some quite telling remarks during his rambling speeches.

Well he was gushing over Arnold Palmer's penis, in a speech recently.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

None of that is the same as 'AI becoming self-aware and launching nukes at us'.

This is a subject for its own thread really, but AI doesn't need to become self aware necessarily in order to act in ways that a self aware being might act. Rixa is accurate enough in the reporting of Hinton's warnings.

 

[Boo Radley75]

There's the actual tweet. Laurence giggling away in the background. Did they just happen to be on the same flight?

A further photo would indicate the answer to your question as "probably not."

 

[teqniq]

And the grift goes on:



A bit of background on The Federal Republic of China and it's proponent a Mr. Gou Wengi or is it Miles Guo, Miles Kwok and "Brother Seven" or maybe even Ho Wan Kwok?

Guo Wengui: Chinese businessman found guilty in US over $1bn scam

Prosecutors said cash raised from businessman's online followers was used to fund his lavish lifestyle.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Lotte]

It appears that the brown-nosing dregs of UK politics have collectively washed up on the shores of Trumps stinking swamp, looking for preferment.

Shameless bottom-feeders, the lot of them.

I don't think they understand how insignificant they are to Republicans.

 

[Petcha]

A further photo would indicate the answer to your question as "probably not."
View attachment 460344

Vomits in mouth. gag

 

[Crispy]

There are rumours that Open AI are very close indeed to artificial general Intelligence.

They're not. Sam Altman says they are to sustain the hype. Microsoft lose their (free) OpenAI licence once AGI is achieved, so it's in OpenAI's interest to make investors believe that day is close. Their entire approach (large language models) is a dead-end and cannot lead to AGI.

 

[two sheds]

None of that is the same as 'AI becoming self-aware and launching nukes at us'.

As littlebabyjesus said, Rixa didn't actually say "becoming self-aware" but that "there have been examples of AI lying to try and stop itself being switched off". Which seems to be true: The Rise of the Deceptive Machines: When AI Learns to Lie - UNU Campus Computing Centre

And rather than "launching nukes at us" they said that AI could "hack into nuclear mainframes". Is that impossible? We've seen successful attacks on SCADA systems: 6 Major SCADA Attacks That Happened And Their Consequences | HackerNoon

You'd hope nuclear attack systems would be isolated from the web, but even then I can imagine hackers finding a way round that.

 

[teqniq]

If true then

 

[emanymton]

They're not. Sam Altman says they are to sustain the hype. Microsoft lose their OpenAI licence once AGI is achieved, so it's in OpenAI's interest to make investors believe that day is close. Their entire approach (large language models) is a dead-end and cannot lead to AGI.

I think we really should start pushing back at the use of the term AI to describe these things. But then I still use it for simplicity so I'm a hypocrite I guess.

 

[two sheds]

Artificial Insemination might be a better term, but as littlebabyjesus says - best for another thread.

 

[Rompipalle]

A further photo would indicate the answer to your question as "probably not."
View attachment 460344

Patriots, each and every one.

 

[Petcha]

A further photo would indicate the answer to your question as "probably not."
View attachment 460344

Who's the guy on the left? And it makes me vomit a little bit more that Suella and Laurence are swapping hats

 

[Skinny Ethel]

Withdraw their passports.

 

[Rebecca Riot]

If true then

Tobias Ellward? Didn't he use to be one of the sensible ones (and I use the word loosely as he's a Tory)?