Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump - MAGAtwat news and discussion

Charlie Kirk, the leader of conservative youth organization Turning Point, threatened to run election challenges against any Republican who votes against Pete Hegseth for defense secretary.

“If anyone in the Senate GOP votes against confirming Pete Hegseth after his stellar performance today, there will be a primary challenge waiting for you. You can take that to the bank,” Kirk wrote on X.

Elon Musk, the owner of X and a megadonor to Trump, responded to Kirk with the “100” emoji, indicating he agreed – a sign that Musk would likely provide financial backing to challenge any Republican lawmakers who came out against Hegseth.
 
I've just been reading that Carrie Underwood is performing at the inauguration. I don't listen to her music, but the fact that she, who is apparently a very big name, deems it an honour to perform there is disgusting. This comes after hearing that The Village People are also performing! What's wrong with these people? TVP had tried unsuccessfully to get him to stop "dancing" to their music at his hate rallies. Money obviously talks, but this is Trump, who never pays up anyway. Fancy throwing your reputation and career away for that fascist.
 
village people i think are just glad for the work, carrie underwood is a republican asshole

feels sorry for Katharine Lee Bates, her song being sang for the cunt trump she'll be rolling in her grave
 
village people i think are just glad for the work, carrie underwood is a republican asshole

feels sorry for Katharine Lee Bates, her song being sang for the cunt trump she'll be rolling in her grave
She will indeed. It's particularly ironic, given that she was a social reformer and strong advocate for women and the education of women, as well as for the poor, people of colour, immigrants and disadvantaged workers.

Trump isn't interested in any of these groups of people unless there's something primarily in it for him.
 
I watched that entire thing. So much to pick out of it but when asked whether he was going to stop the current policy of providing medical transport for female soldiers abroad who needed 'reproductive healthcare', ie possibly abortions, he confirmed that as a Christian, yes he would.
 
Christian my fucking arse

last time he was holding a bible

before

ap-20153836517351.jpg




after


5ce4316c8ec7e1bbc89808b7503617a8
 
Christian my fucking arse

last time he was holding a bible

before

ap-20153836517351.jpg




after


5ce4316c8ec7e1bbc89808b7503617a8
If I were religious, I'd see him as the antichrist. He held that Bible upside down apparently. How he doesn't spontaneously combust when he utters his bullshit, I'll never know 😄. How do the fundamentalists see him as their Messiah? Remember this?

Under a minute so watch or don't.

 
I wouldn't have made maomao 's post as I'm a bit of a wimp and my attitude probably wobbles around a bit given that she paid a pretty heavy price for what she was doing. But after all that, I'm not sure what maomao got wrong.

Hmm... well she ripped into the bastard. Had him on the ropes. And he couldn't really keep going back to his own military experience in the face of her own experience.

But it's a bit extreme (and insanely juvenile) to wish death on the 'murderous cunt'. Without knowing anything about her.

 
Hmm... well she ripped into the bastard. Had him on the ropes. And he couldn't really keep going back to his own military experience in the face of her own experience.

But it's a bit extreme (and insanely juvenile) to wish death on the 'murderous cunt'. Without knowing anything about her.

I'm as anti-Trump as anyone else, but we can't let that trick us into thinking of the Democrats as the good guys.
 
Hmm... well she ripped into the bastard. Had him on the ropes. And he couldn't really keep going back to his own military experience in the face of her own experience.

But it's a bit extreme (and insanely juvenile) to wish death on the 'murderous cunt'. Without knowing anything about her.

She's got a wiki page, the people she killed haven't.
 
Hmm... well she ripped into the bastard. Had him on the ropes. And he couldn't really keep going back to his own military experience in the face of her own experience.

But it's a bit extreme (and insanely juvenile) to wish death on the 'murderous cunt'. Without knowing anything about her.

I know she flew combat helicopters in an illegal war. (And fwiw I'm generally a wishy-washy type who thinks it's not particularly helpful or useful to wish death on anyone, it can frequently be funny though.)
 
Hmm... well she ripped into the bastard. Had him on the ropes. And he couldn't really keep going back to his own military experience in the face of her own experience.

But it's a bit extreme (and insanely juvenile) to wish death on the 'murderous cunt'. Without knowing anything about her.

Thanks for the link:
"Duckworth supports continued U.S. military aid to Israel and opposes the movement for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel"
 
Duckworth was severely wounded


...rocket-propelled grenade blew through the plexiglass “chin bubble” window at my feet and detonated in a violent fireball right in my lap. The explosion vaporized my right leg. It blew my left leg up into the bottom of the instrument panel, shearing off the shin below the knee and leaving my leg hanging by just a thin thread of flesh. And because I had leaned forward, reaching to activate the GPS, the explosion also tore through my right arm, violently shredding it into a bloody mess of muscle, sinew, and bone. In a single, shattering instant, my body was blown apart. My skin was burned and riddled with shrapnel, and blood began pumping out of my wounds.

 
I know she flew combat helicopters in an illegal war. (And fwiw I'm generally a wishy-washy type who thinks it's not particularly helpful or useful to wish death on anyone, it can frequently be funny though.)
I don't do a lot of death wishing these days but it seems proportionate for a psychotic killer and supporter of genocide.
 
I don’t think Geneva Conventions cover their situation
I'm not sure of the relevance of the Geneva convention. The exchange - below - was about whether soldiers are just following orders or have some responsibility for the deaths they cause. My point is that the 'heroic' American soldier is a position not all that different to members of 'terrorist' groups. She was certainly fighting in an illegal war.

Is that aimed solely at her, or all of the Armed Forces? They don't get to choose where they see action. They follow orders.

Would you extend that to, say, the soldiers of Islamic State?
 
MAGA = thick.

I have the honour of knowing and dealing with a huge number of Americans, my parent company is located on Broadway.

The only one I know who's a Trumpist is a mate of my dad. He was captain in the US army in Vietnam where he was awarded a Purple Heart. He moved to the UK and became a money man, lived in a mansion on the Wentworth Estate, became captain of the golf club (you can look him him, captain K P). He had the most beautiful wooden sailing boat it has ever been my pleasure to sail on. He and his lovely Dutch wife currently live in Florida in a luxurious condo in Clearwater. My dad and him nearly fell out over Trump a few years ago as he couldn't understand how anyone could support him, but K does; in his world-view Trump is better for America than the alternatives.

Is K, a multi-millionaire, decorated ex-army captain, lived a life of luxury, stupid?
I'm finding the whole debate around people being stupid to be pointless so kind of hate that I'm contributing towards it now.

I don't really like the idea of describing people as stupid as I'm not sure how you guage this. People can be very intuitive and smart in some ways, but in other ways really struggle and might appear stupid. Me included - great with a mental health crisis and can tell you the ins and outs of many drugs, but absolutely shocking at other skills that people find easy. Yes you fractions.

This post sums up how our ideas of intelligence are often biased towards people who meet particular social standards that are usually based on capitalist ideas of success. How could a decorated ex-army captain, who is a multimillionaire and live a life of luxury possibly be stupid? They must be smart and know what they are talking about as they are clearly successful. (I'm not saying you do this BS just talking more generally.)

This is why people like Sheryl Sandberg a CCO at Meta is quoted in an article about Children's Mental Health. Her only qualification appearing to be books that have been written on mental health and a book on women in the workplace that was slammed for being out of touch with what the average women is experiencing. It is why people like Musk and Zuckerberg are able to generate so much attention and there views are often sought after by the press. We (society) fetishise economically successful people and amplify their views even when they don't have any knowledge about the subject.

This is not to say that people have to be an "expert", or a professional to have a view heard on a subject. Hearing from people's experience is important, but how often are working class and/or economically poor people given that platform?

In contrast many of the poorer people I know, who often don't have a job or anything that would be considered a success in this world, are some of the most intuitive and smart people you could meet. They are often written off by people/services/political commentators as stupid before they even get through the door and this suits capitalism as it individualsies their struggle. It's also why any person from a poorer backgrounds who does manage to achieve success is amplified - this person did it, so can you, and there is nothing wrong the system. There are millions of people out there that could achieve material, educational and work success but are never given the opportunities due to their economic and social background. Millions of people who could specialise in all forms of work lost.

It sounds like your Dads friend is voting in his best interests tbh. It is not hard to see why someone like that would vote Trump. I don't think the poorer people who voted Trump are stupid necessarly, but I am not surprised to see such sweeping statements made about them as it is something that people generally believe anyway.

My experience in the UK is that people know they are being failed and the current system is not working. I was radicalised as a child to blame immigrants and particularly Muslims for the problems in my local area. Violence against them promoted. I might have voted Farage. Might have been on the other side of the protest lines in August. I saw the problems, I just didn't see the root causes at that time and the other solutions had not yet cut through to me. I suspect many would label me as stupid then, and I guess that I was less stupid once I came around to another way of thinking. This stuff goes deep and it's not about intelligence imo.
 
I'm finding the whole debate around people being stupid to be pointless so kind of hate that I'm contributing towards it now.

I don't really like the idea of describing people as stupid as I'm not sure how you guage this. People can be very intuitive and smart in some ways, but in other ways really struggle and might appear stupid. Me included - great with a mental health crisis and can tell you the ins and outs of many drugs, but absolutely shocking at other skills that people find easy. Yes you fractions.

This post sums up how our ideas of intelligence are often biased towards people who meet particular social standards that are usually based on capitalist ideas of success. How could a decorated ex-army captain, who is a multimillionaire and live a life of luxury possibly be stupid? They must be smart and know what they are talking about as they are clearly successful. (I'm not saying you do this BS just talking more generally.)

This is why people like Sheryl Sandberg a CCO at Meta is quoted in an article about Children's Mental Health. Her only qualification appearing to be books that have been written on mental health and a book on women in the workplace that was slammed for being out of touch with what the average women is experiencing. It is why people like Musk and Zuckerberg are able to generate so much attention and there views are often sought after by the press. We (society) fetishise economically successful people and amplify their views even when they don't have any knowledge about the subject.

This is not to say that people have to be an "expert", or a professional to have a view heard on a subject. Hearing from people's experience is important, but how often are working class and/or economically poor people given that platform?

In contrast many of the poorer people I know, who often don't have a job or anything that would be considered a success in this world, are some of the most intuitive and smart people you could meet. They are often written off by people/services/political commentators as stupid before they even get through the door and this suits capitalism as it individualsies their struggle. It's also why any person from a poorer backgrounds who does manage to achieve success is amplified - this person did it, so can you, and there is nothing wrong the system. There are millions of people out there that could achieve material, educational and work success but are never given the opportunities due to their economic and social background. Millions of peopleIwho could specialise in all forms of work lost.

It sounds like your Dads friend is voting in his best interests tbh. It is not hard to see why someone like that would vote Trump. I don't think the poorer people who voted Trump are stupid necessarly, but I am not surprised to see such sweeping statements made about them as it is something that people generally believe anyway.

My experience in the UK is that people know they are being failed and the current system is not working. I was radicalised as a child to blame immigrants and particularly Muslims for the problems in my local area. Violence against them promoted. I might have voted Farage. Might have been on the other side of the protest lines in August. I saw the problems, I just didn't see the root causes at that time and the other solutions had not yet cut through to me. I suspect many would label me as stupid then, and I guess that I was less stupid once I came around to another way of thinking. This stuff goes deep and it's not about intelligence imo.
It's perhaps a bit different, but the word rational also dissolves when you look at the reality of people's lives, when you try and think about things from their perspective and their experiences. We all think things and do things on the basis of who we are, our experiences and the influences brought to bear on us. When it comes to things like voting, it is rarely irrational, there is always a reason or, perhaps, a rationale. Calling people stupid or irrational means you don't have to engage with them, who they are and what is going on in their life. Don't even have to think about the wider political economy. To be honest, I think that using 'stupid' as a reason to not engage with people or think about their lives has been going on on this thread. I don't say that (purely ;)) to provoke a further round of Urban's 'stupid war', I think it's an important point to make in itself.

In fact it seems feckin' obvious. When you get something like Brexit or the Dems failure to win even against someone like Trump, something is worthy of further thought. Something about the liberal order and the effects of neoliberalism and austerity. Stupid doesn't take you there.
 
Back
Top Bottom