DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
there is no way Dame Judi Dench would do it!
to big for it I suppose. But no it was last years speculation- in her role as M she does dark puppet master (lol) well.
there is no way Dame Judi Dench would do it!
how many times has the master appeared in dr who since it returned? it's not like she turns up every series like those fucking daleks!
Unlike Sir Derek of Jacobi of courseto big for it I suppose. But no it was last years speculation- in her role as M she does dark puppet master (lol) well.
paves the way for a femal doc in future. makes gender changing accepted.
Didn't the master's wife pick up his ring from the funeral pyre at the end of a tenant episode (thus making the way for a female regen of the master)?
well remembered. But was that the pyre from simms first outing as master? because when he came back in white with stupid powers I thought he was sucked into the timelock with the time lords and thier 70s costumes
That was so sad.Indeed. The pyre/ring thing was at the end of the series with Martha, where the Master died heroically on Ten's lap as they cried at each other in a very loving way.
no it was one of his followers not his wife.Didn't the master's wife pick up his ring from the funeral pyre at the end of a tenant episode (thus making the way for a female regen of the master)?
I love that bit. At the time they said female time lords could regenerate into whoever they liked where er they liked, as many times as they wanted.For time lord regeneration shenanigans see how they introduced lala ward to the role of Romana
It wasn't explicitly just a time lady thing. It was to explain how the actress who played the local protagonist in the last episode is now the actress playing the doctor's companion in this.I love that bit. At the time they said female time lords could regenerate into whoever they liked where er they liked, as many times as they wanted.
Yes of course it was just a throwaway reason for ward to take over the romana role, but then it was just something time ladies could do. Same as regeneration, it wasn't even a regeneration until the fourth doctor. First it was a renewal (via the tardis) then a 'change of appearance' as a punishment (not much of a punishment if time lords do it all the time).It wasn't explicitly just a time lady thing. It was to explain how the actress who played the local protagonist in the last episode is now the actress playing the doctor's companion in this.
Why was there a need to fill the nation's children with existential fear of eternal torment? Aren't Daleks and cyerbmen alone enough to give them a well meaning fright?
why? This is the thread where we discuss the epsiode hence the title, which you seem to have misread. If other people's opinions bother you then the internet isn't the best place for you.Jesus Christ, give it a rest.
why? This is the thread where we discuss the epsiode hence the title, which you seem to have misread. If other people's opinions bother you then the internet isn't the best place for you.
i suppose they could have been wooden chairs but that seems a bit far fetched for dr whoHow come you could see the chairs in the tanks? Were they organic chairs?
i suppose they could have been wooden chairs but that seems a bit far fetched for dr who
Is that what you thought I said?When you're reduced to "Why is Doctor Who scary?" level moaning, it suggests to me that you are trying a wee bit too hard to dislike it.
Why was there a need to fill the nation's children with existential fear of eternal torment?