I suppose it must have been rupert, but it sounded like river to me.Did she say River? I thought she said Rupert, followed by Orson. And then she realised it was the doctor.
I suppose it must have been rupert, but it sounded like river to me.Did she say River? I thought she said Rupert, followed by Orson. And then she realised it was the doctor.
That was his giant erection at the sight of a young woman in a sexy black dress suddenly appearing in his room!
Seriously, it's a kid's home; just walk right in and start talking to a young kid you'venever seen before.
Because kids homes are bastions of responsibility and professional care.
The whole meeting yourself can be cataclysmic schtick. He may not remember anyway but Clara probably didn't want to take the chance.Not if any old tom dick and clara can just clamber over the fence and gain access to a child's bedroom!
But it's ok becuase we know Clara isn't Myra Hindley and isn't going to murder little Rupert.
Who, fortunately, doesn't remember the night that the woman he is sat opposite appeared in his bedroom, along with her weird old friend. The night the ghost appeared.
That's all well and good, but Moffat presumes so much in his quest toward the clever-clever ending. Why would it even matter if the Junior Doctor had got out of bed? Why would that end the universe? He wouldn't know that blue box was a Tardis, nor would he necessarily see the hot girl under his bed.
one nephew looking under his bed before going to sleep - check
job jobbed
What are they going to be checking for, Clara Oswald? Feel like any tension or fear built up was kinda undermined by it being Clara under the bed and the Doctor's obsession seemingly being born out of Clara messing around in his timeline (again - that she is seemingly so influential in the Doctor's life is somewhat infuriating).
Ok, there was the thing under the blanket, but that seemingly got forgotten by the end of the episode...
Pfah, metaphysical timey-wimey mumbojumbo. I want something that will eat your eyeballs!We are hiding from our selves, our past, our future. That's what I thought..
Pfah, metaphysical timey-wimey mumbojumbo. I want something that will eat your eyeballs!
I checkedI said to Badgers "I wonder how many kids (or adults) will be checking under their beds or having nightmares tonight?".
That's a proper Dr Who episode if it does that
I really enjoyed that one
yes!Don't be scared even though I, the strange voice inexplicably under your bed, have you be the ankles.
Aye, but everything you've written on this thread shows that you're cloth-eared.I suppose it must have been rupert, but it sounded like river to me.
Don't be scared even though I, the strange voice inexplicably under your bed, have you be the ankles.
Aye, but everything you've written on this thread shows that you're cloth-eared.
A fine episode, well scripted and played, proper tense and high on spook factor. It even pretty much made sense.
We are hiding from our selves, our past, our future. That's what I thought.
But yeah, the thing under the blanket, maybe it was just supposed to be nothing but a product of our imagination.
The need for there to be actually something to be afraid of.
Also it's turning into a series that may as well be called Clara and the Doc. Imo.
I can't pin down why I think that but it seems unlikely that different writers would have such obvious similarities with previous plotlines in their scripts without somebody noticing it which sort of makes me think it might be deliberate.
I kind of get the Blink comparisons but Silence in the Library?Its the same writer - moffort wrote blink and silence in the library.
I kind of get the Blink comparisons but Silence in the Library?