TopCat
Putin fanboy
Google people rowing about Crass mixes on interwebs. Intense!Oh the joy of being into anarcho punk. None of this shit matters and I don't have to spend money on hardware!
Google people rowing about Crass mixes on interwebs. Intense!Oh the joy of being into anarcho punk. None of this shit matters and I don't have to spend money on hardware!
I have no idea.Are US consumers happy to pay more for products produced in a highly regulated environment (the EU) compared to the low regulation environment at home?
He’s claiming an Ethernet cable can alter the sound of a streaming audio system. Which is complete horseshit.
I will look at US audiophile sites then.I have no idea.
Analogue canles make no difference to the sound, never mind digitalNow, I’m not an expert on this sort of thing, but it does smell a bit whiffy. For starters, don’t ethernet cables transfer data at way over the rates needed for audio files even if you buy the cheapest one out there?
Analogue canles make no difference to the sound, never mind digital
I have to admit some conformation bias. I tend to use Shure products for making music, mixing and listening to it.
Got a set of SE846’s and SRH1840’s. And an SM58 and SM57.
Daltrey used one to record 'Live At Leeds'! I noticed Stewart Lee uses one for his stand up. I'm a drummer primarily but i use one for live backing vocals. Tough as old boots and always works. I use the SM57 for recording guitar straight from the amp (Van Halen does it to create the famous 'brown sound'...not that i'm that good on the guitar!).For live work I don't think you'll get anything for non-silly money that's as good as an SM58.
That was the case 10 years ago imo, anyway.
I know what he's claiming. I read the article.He’s claiming an Ethernet cable can alter the sound of a streaming audio system. Which is complete horseshit.
There’s a huge range of vocal mics that sound way better than a ‘58, both cheaper and more expensive.For live work I don't think you'll get anything for non-silly money that's as good as an SM58.
That was the case 10 years ago imo, anyway.
So, just out of casual interest, what would you recommend as a cheaper (or equivalent) SM-58-a-like? Asking for a bandmate...There’s a huge range of vocal mics that sound way better than a ‘58, both cheaper and more expensive.
However, it’s still the most widely used mic out there. Why? Because that’s what all engineers now know. I can say a few lines through one into a PA and know fairly quickly how that rig is going to sound, what I need to adjust etc. They also have the advantage of being built like a tank so last pretty much forever.
‘57’s are everywhere for similar reasons - they don’t sound amazing but they don’t sound bad either and you can use them on pretty much anything. If in doubt - an exotic instrument you don’t know, a strange guitar setup etc - point a ‘57 at it. It’ll work
Cheaper than a 58 but sometimes sounds better - AKG D5So, just out of casual interest, what would you recommend as a cheaper (or equivalent) SM-58-a-like? Asking for a bandmate...
what would it be used for? vox, instr? live or rec?So, just out of casual interest, what would you recommend as a cheaper (or equivalent) SM-58-a-like? Asking for a bandmate...
If you're paying £50 for a 58 it's fake from China.tbh a 58 or 57 goes for 50 quid or so. what you get is something versatile and reliable. why save a tenner or so to get something that will prolly sound similar but won't be as reliable?
tbh a 58 or 57 goes for 50 quid or so. what you get is something versatile and reliable. why save a tenner or so to get something that will prolly sound similar but won't be as reliable?
Vox, live.what would it be used for? vox, instr? live or rec?
Look at getting a condenser for acoustic guitar, assuming you have an interface that can supply +48V phantom power. Think a bit about positioning and hang an old duvet behind the mic to cut down on room reflections and you'll get decent results.New they're about 90 quid.
I want one at some point for acoustic guitar. Read about some others I was recommended but they cost way more or are probably too sensitive for recording in my front room...
Look at getting a condenser for acoustic guitar, assuming you have an interface that can supply +48V phantom power. Think a bit about positioning and hang an old duvet behind the mic to cut down on room reflections and you'll get decent results.
Honestly, get a condenser. sE make some really good ones that don't break the bank.Thanks. Have a focusrite Saffire that can provide the juice. Problem is I have quite a high ceiling as well as general traffic noise. I've experimented with the SM57 I've got but obv it's not really suited for that. Thought about getting one of these gain boosting preamps for dynamic mics. Cloud Lifter, Fet Head etc but think I'd be better off getting another mic. One mic I was looking at / reading about was the CAD M179. Still might go for this at some point.
Pretty much every paragraph has a gem of some kind in it.More amazing still is buried in the text - I see we now have a market opening for an Audiophile ISP...!
It’s interesting how some of these other engineers (and their minions) denounce what audiophiles are hearing as placebo and hallucinations. They also demand double-blind and null tests for everything. Do they really think intelligent people who are able to afford this gear – would drop lots of cash for something they don’t really hear?