Fictionist
Serving Eargasms....
Argh, how many times - copper is copper is copper.
Cables. Make. No. Difference.
They do. They do. I know you think this not to be the case, and I get the impression you work in sound, but I disagree strongly.
Argh, how many times - copper is copper is copper.
Cables. Make. No. Difference.
I would suggest that you try the process that I outlined to Apathy. Choose the music most appropriate to you, music with which you connect in the deepest way (for whatever reason). Give it a go and see what you hear - not what you think.
I wanna know if you tried it though and what were the results?
thanks for the advice fictionist, Rotel was another amp ive been thinking about too, the ra-05 maybe. Not actually heard the rotel or the nad or arcam in action with the b&W's, just going off what ive read about tbh
I bought particular components that I liked.
Yes. Within reason.
Naim CD player - cost £1k in '97
Leak valve amp I completely rebuilt myself in '93- total cost £120
Stacked Quad ESLs - paid £700 for in '97
Connected together with wire. Far from perfect, but loves most of the music I do.
A couple of grand to go with a CD collection that cost significantly more.
I give you the editor of Stereophile, a respected hi-fi magazine of 33 years standing. He's talking about blinded tests on amplifiers: "It seems," he says, "that with such blind listening tests, all perceived subjective differences ... fall away ... when you have taken part in a number of these blind tests and experienced how two amplifiers you know from personal experience to sound extremely different can still fail to be identified under blind conditions ..." Now I'm getting worried. Here comes the money shot. "... then perhaps an alternative hypothesis is called for: that the very procedure of a blind listening test can conceal small but real subjective differences." Ouch. "Having taken part in quite a number of such blind tests, I have become convinced of the truth in this hypothesis." What voodoo is this? If there is a difference to be heard, then you will hear it.
A bit excessive for the speakers but not too bad, amp, pretty standard really but £1k for a CD player? Fuck! I'm not particularly clued up on CD players but does an expensive one make a difference? A laser's a laser isn't it? Maybe there's slight differences in quality of laser but not that much surely?
Once you've heard electrostatics, you can never take anything else seriously. New, full size electrostatics cost thousands.
I tried several CD players around that time and yes, there was a large difference.
Ironically this outfit works brilliantly for dub and dance music.
My upgrade will be a barn in France - my own private retirement rave.
I may need beefier bass units though ...
They do. They do. I know you think this not to be the case, and I get the impression you work in sound, but I disagree strongly.
Fair enough, I got no idea what you're on about . I haven't used a CD player since 2004, and that was no where near worth a grand.
They do. They do. I know you think this not to be the case, and I get the impression you work in sound, but I disagree strongly.
That's quite funny. I can see why some people would get taken into the whole audio cable thing.
Of course, but you're avoiding the question i'm asking.
Watch the video I posted. Learn some physics. Do proper ABX tests.
Buy expensive cables and you are being conned. It's as simple as that.
WTF? Are you insane? How can it possibly make any difference? You are not talking about anything other than a connecter. If you make a connection there is a connection if you don't there is no connection.
Music isn't flowing though the leads you know.
You know recording studios and mastering studios? They need the best cleanest signal paths, they really need to hear everything so that they can balance a mix properly or really fine tune a mix for a mastering session. You know there are some really big famous bands? They all want their music mastered in the best studios all around the world. You know what? They use normal leads. The bands plug into their amps with normal leads, the patch bays have normal leads. If it really made a jack of difference all the best desks would be constructed internally in the same 'magically expensive for no real reason' way, but thankfully it makes no difference so they don't cost trillions.
It's science fact.
Does anyone else find the term 'audiophile' a load of old wank? .
No, here is a test. Get someone else to change, or not change the interconnects and then play back the same piece of music in the same room on the same speakers. Do this many times, sometimes changing the cables, sometimes leaving them alone. Only answer the qeustion "does it sound any different this time?" Do not have the other person tell you what they've done. Do not have the other person in the room or even see you. You might also like to use a fancy recording device to accurately record the emitted sound for later comparison.Here is a test. Take a Chord Cobra interconnect, an Audioquest, Linn Silver and Naim cable interconnects. Use them between a cd and amplifier without changing the speakers. Listen to the same piece of music, one that is familar.
If u can't hear a difference in presentation I would be surprised.
They were deadly serious, it was meant to make for a crisper, cleaner sound - they got loads of audiophile types to try it and many reported at length on the improvement.
Here is a test. Take a Chord Cobra interconnect, an Audioquest, Linn Silver and Naim cable interconnects. Use them between a cd and amplifier without changing the speakers. Listen to the same piece of music, one that is familar.
If u can't hear a difference in presentation I would be surprised.