PaulAtherton
Member
Do the figures quoted include in some way the reserves for employee pensions? I would suspect the Torygraph would have linked together as many tenuous sources of money, which may be unusable for whatever reason, that a in councils' names and then just spewed out a headline statistic to hammer home the Telegraph smaller government mantra.
Of course, there'd be more expendable funds for local and national governments if rich arseholes like the Barclay brothers didn't buy private islands to avoid tax.
No this is a cash reserve that is budgeted for every year, from what I can tell from the accounts. Each year the expenditure of the reserve is shown as an expense. Funding for employees pensions is a separate entry and is quite considerable.
In Lambeth's Case - the reserve contribution for 2009/2010 was £3.7 Million, but the back funding for Pensions was £12.8 Million.