'Did We Land on the Moon' - Channel 5, 8pm (spoilers)

[Voley]

I have yet to watch this programme so remain open-minded. I'm sure to be convinced by the intensive research and empirical evidence that is the hallmark of a Channel 5 documentary when I watch it later this weekend.

 

[Dillinger4]

The question of whether we landed on the moon is the wrong one. The real question is when did the moon men land on us?

 

[Firky]

NASA animated gifs

 

[8ball]

The question of whether we landed on the moon is the wrong one. The real question is when did the moon men land on us?

I just don't believe they ever came back.

It can't be a coincidence that since the Moon landings, Neil Armstrong and/or Buzz Aldrin were never seen in the same room as Jim Henson.

 

[Dillinger4]

I just don't believe they ever came back.

It can't be a coincidence that since the Moon landings, Neil Armstrong and/or Buzz Aldrin were never seen in the same room as Jim Henson.

 

[TheHoodedClaw]

Examples of what?

Bodge-job photos from the Moon.

 

[danny la rouge]

Bodge-job photos from the Moon.

Loads here:

Just way too many things wrong with this picture!

Notice the absence of stars again.

The arrows indicate the various directions in which shadows are falling, again showing evidence of inconsistent scene illumination. Yet there is something even more obviously wrong with this picture.

If the length of the lower support column of the lunar lander was 4 feet tall, this would indicate that the astronaut was over 8 feet tall, which none of the astronauts were.

Another careless mistake from NASA.

 

[TheHoodedClaw]

Solid right that, that'll smart

To call one of the Apollo astronauts (or anyone who's been in space for that matter) a coward is just unbelievable. Adding in "liar" and "thief", well then words fail, as they clearly did for Buzz.

 

[TheHoodedClaw]

Loads here:

One of the best pages on the web, that.

 

[youngian]

Yeah we did. If it was ever in doubt, then the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera's pictures of the landing module and tire tracks are pretty conclusive evidence.

However it's also been suggested that Stanley Kubrick was involved with NASA and that he developed some staged footage for them in order to keep their advanced technology secret. A lot of the R&D was done while making 2001: A Space Odyssey. Allegedly there's also references to his involvement in The Shining and also Eyes Wide Shut

Kubrick's connection with this fake moon landing mumbo jumbo is this- When he was making his adaptation of Thackery's Barry Lyndon in pre-digital camera days, Kubrick wanted to shoot interior scenes without artificial light and rely on natural candle light that would have been used in the 18th century and give the scenes the look of a Gainsborough painting.

His camera men told him to forget it but Kubrick was curious as to how NASA managed to film the moon landings. As a consequence he borrowed their bespoke super fast lenses (the Zeiss lens) with the lowest aperture f-stop ever used on a feature film-

The results were stunning-


Also any photographer or cameraman, with a reasonable knowledge of their craft, can debunk all this shadows on the moon bullshit in about five mintutes.

 

[TheHoodedClaw]

Also any photographer or cameraman, with a reasonable knowledge of their craft, can debunk all this shadows on the moon bullshit in about five mintutes.

Also, anyone who has ever lived on anything other than a flat surface with a single light source.

 

[Citizen66]

If Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon, then what about the camera man?

 

[TheHoodedClaw]

If Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon, then what about the camera man?

The flag moved even though there's no air! The flag with the springy arm to keep it straight moved!!! And it kept moving even though theres no air!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Citizen66]

[insert something about radiation belts]

 

[likesfish]

The main problem that should shoot down the did we not land on the moon is the russians had the kit to prove the yanks landed or didnt on the moon.
Much like hilarly clinton would have shot down obamas campaign if there had been any chance he wasnt a us citizen

 

[editor]

For those people still too stupid to think that the Moon landings were faked. NVidia used some hi tech 3D light modelling to prove it.

 

[Obnoxiousness]

I can't find all the clips, but Mythbusters did a whole show based upon the Moon landings. They covered the footprint theory, the flag in a vacuum theory, the moon walk theory, etc, etc.

And everything they discovered pointed to the Moon landings being 100% real.



Science Bitch!!!

 

[8ball]

You fucking sheeple will believe anything - look at the fucking sky!

Look at the sky and what do you see - no chemtrails! Not a single fucking chemtrail!!
So they were going to send these 2 or 3 guys up into space and let them bounce around on the Moon, saying whatever the fuck they like to everyone back on Earth with NO FUCKING MIND CONTROL!?!?!??

Is that really plausible to you?

Or is it more plausible that the US Government threw a graphics card company a small tax break to make a video.

Wake up America!!

 

[JimW]

If they landed on the moon, where's my free cheese?

 

[DotCommunist]

under your foreskin

 

[JimW]

Not since that terrible wanking accident with the Dyson

 

[andysays]

This makes, um, interesting viewing

The Shining Code is a one-hour documentary which deciphers and explains the meaning behind Stanley Kubrick's The Shining

 

[DotCommunist]

if Kubrik had done the filming it would have been better

 

[Gromit]

Which moon are we talking about?

There's a secret moon only the Illuminati are allowed to see.

 

[Awesome Wells]

In Soviet Russia Moon Lands On You

 

[fucthest8]

Or - and I'm going out on a limb here - Jack represents a character from a Steven King novel, you utter fucking madman.

(Not you andysays)

 

[andysays]

Or - and I'm going out on a limb here - Jack represents a character from a Steven King novel, you utter fucking madman.

(Not you andysays)

What fascinated me when I watched it was just how many secret signifiers this guy was able to "find" and how elaborate (though utterly crazy) a theory he was able to build.

From memory (I watched it a month or so ago when I stumbled across it on youtube) it includes a discussion on how the sequence of Jack driving through the mountains up to the hotel represents a journey to the moon, and the insistance that the famous pattern on the hotel carpet represents the Apollo launch pad. There are also numerous examples of finding As and 11s in the composition of shots.

It's actually quite an entertaining thing to watch - I recommend it, though obviously not for any "truth value"

 

[fucthest8]

What fascinated me when I watched it was just how many secret signifiers this guy was able to "find" and how elaborate (though utterly crazy) a theory he was able to build.

From memory (I watched it a month or so ago when I stumbled across it on youtube) it includes a discussion on how the sequence of Jack driving through the mountains up to the hotel represents a journey to the moon, and the insistance that the famous pattern on the hotel carpet represents the Apollo launch pad. There are also numerous examples of finding As and 11s in the composition of shots.

It's actually quite an entertaining thing to watch - I recommend it, though obviously not for any "truth value"

Yep, that's the work of your actual mad man, right there. I'm not just being horrible here, I mean the person needs help. Tragic.

 

[Eggby]

Well I could just about believe that a moon landing might be faked once, albeit with an incredible risk of discovery...but the Yanks went there six times, how on Earth could they all be faked? (pun not really intended).

 

[tony heath]

The astronauts could have left a mark we can see from earth but I'm glad they didn't.