I understand the need for clear info but I have absolutely no intention of giving the 2% figure any credibility if it makes people looking for a clear and simple picture think that 2 out of every 100 people who catch Covid-19 will die.
There are several reasons why I dont go down this route. A big one is because I dont have to, there are plenty of other sources for that sort of thing if thats the sort of info people want, just skip my shit. Another big one is that I watched a bunch of credible nuclear experts on television delivering their nice, safe, tidy messages in the first days after the woes at the nuclear plant began. Then one of the buildings suffered a hydrogen explosion and some of those experts became instantly useless in the field of public communication about Fukushima, because this eventuality was not covered by the picture they painted. I also saw people mocking the earlier mortality rates given for swine flu, once it became clear that the reality differend by several orders of magnitude.
Well, I feel bound to try to say things that avoid going down such a dead end myself. After all, I am likely to still be talking about this subject long after most people have lost interest. And most of my waffle is of even less use if I've blown my credibility with oversimplifications. If I am ever of any use at all, its by trying to describe the picture as I see it, even if such a process is tedious, occasionally alarming, not to some peoples tastes, treads on a few toes, and I do it with relish, with little regard for whether I come across at times as a bloated and pompous, arrogant imposter.