Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Concorde supersonic aeroplane, 1976-2003

If Concorde was still airworthy, I wonder what the breakeven figure per passenger would be nowadays. I’m sure RR could trim the engines’ fuel consumption with current technology or know-how.

My point is that if it turns out the breakeven figure per pax is, say, 10k, you could clearly have no problem finding a hundred people per day happy to pay 16k for a Concorde seat. This is ignoring all the maintenance spares or noise complaints issues…
 
Maybe. Ignores that virtual meetings are so much better and easier now than when Concorde was around, if you absolutely needed to speak to someone the five hour advantage may not now be enough.
 
Not convinced there’s the demand.
How many people each day are flying London or Paris to NYC in full fare first class, as opposed to redemptions and discounted first class, across say 25-30 flights with different carriers at various times.

Is it even 100, I reckon it might be less? Would they all want to commit to flying at what would be only a couple of fixed times
 
Elpenor said:
Not convinced there’s the demand.
How many people each day are flying London or Paris to NYC in full fare first class, as opposed to redemptions and discounted first class, across say 25-30 flights with different carriers at various times.

Is it even 100, I reckon it might be less? Would they all want to commit to flying at what would be only a couple of fixed times
Click to expand...
Oh, I’m sure Bahnhof Strasse will give you a far more accurate picture, but there are certainly shit loads of daily flights by at least four or five major airlines between London and NY. I suspect also plenty of Paris ones too.
 
T & P said:
Oh, I’m sure Bahnhof Strasse will give you a far more accurate picture, but there are certainly shit loads of daily flights by at least four or five major airlines between London and NY. I suspect also plenty of Paris ones too.
Click to expand...

Yeah that’s my point the frequency is more important than the speed, must be around one an hour from Heathrow to New York.
 
Elpenor said:
Yeah that’s my point the frequency is more important than the speed, must be around one an hour from Heathrow to New York.
Click to expand...
Oh I see. Still, the route was successful before as far as passenger demand was concerned.
 
I had seen the odd piece of footage onboard a Concorde flight, but this is a real-world 'trip report' by a passenger filmed with a camcorder.

Cool as fuck. If you don't want to watch the whole thing, you must at the least check out the take-off from 2:17. The speed whilst still on the runway is astonishing :cool:

 
T & P said:
I had seen the odd piece of footage onboard a Concorde flight, but this is a real-world 'trip report' by a passenger filmed with a camcorder.

Cool as fuck. If you don't want to watch the whole thing, you must at the least check out the take-off from 2:17. The speed whilst still on the runway is astonishing :cool:

Click to expand...

250mph take off speed!
 
Thesaint said:
Double what roughly most planes rotate at, so I imagine you can feel the acceleration more sinking into your seat far more.

Presumably Concorde couldn't exceed 250kts under 10,000ft but I guess it had plenty of power to climb to that quick enough and accelerate again.
Click to expand...
In the above video, I thought it unnecessary and silly that the author felt the need to add the disclaimer ‘this is not at x2 speed but real time footage’ just before takeoff. But then I watched Concorde accelerating on the runway and was utterly gobsmacked at how much faster it was compared with every subsonic plane I’ve been on :eek:
 
Bahnhof Strasse said:
Maybe. Ignores that virtual meetings are so much better and easier now than when Concorde was around, if you absolutely needed to speak to someone the five hour advantage may not now be enough.
Click to expand...
If you can afford to regularly use it at the kind of price it’d cost today you’re probably in the owning a private jet class…
 
1927 said:
I think thats the one at Duxford.
Click to expand...

I was there a couple of weeks ago. Seem to remember there was something about that in the exhibit so I think you’re right.

The thing that most if us went wtf at was the escape hatches.

Yeah I’m jumping out of an aircraft doing Mach 2 just to become jam on the fuselage…

I imagine that wasn’t the original expectation of their use but that’s where our heads went. :D

IMG_1689.jpegIMG_1688.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

nuffsaid
Boom....The new Concorde...?
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
T & P
T & P
editor
London St Pancras station 15 years ago – photos of the semi-derelict Midland Grand hotel, June 2003
Replies
11
Views
569
skyscraper101
skyscraper101
nuffsaid
Woman throws coins into jet engine of aeroplane for good luck
Replies
8
Views
633
Saul Goodman
Saul Goodman
weltweit
Concorde Mark 2: Airbus files plans for new supersonic jet
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Crispy
Crispy
beesonthewhatnow
Concorde
Replies
11
Views
951
Badgers
Badgers
Back
Top Bottom