Twattor
Well-Known Member
But Minton's article has no real basis in anything. She simply asks people if they'd like something back that they had 10 years ago. You could ask the same of daily mail readers.From the research findings of Minton's study,
Why shouldnt people in social housing have caretakers and youth workers in the area they live in?
And why shouldn't Minton have a political position?
Its not utopian to want caretakers on ones estate and youth workers. They were there but its all gradually been cut. In politically driven austerity cuts in case of youth provision.
A point Minton is making is that getting rid of caretakers and youth workers and replacing them with yet more security is a political decision.
She also traces the history of the development of secured by design from US to here by Alice Coleman. Where it fitted in with Thatcherism.
What I was taking issue with in my post 163 is the attitude that "common sense" solutions trump criticism of those with a political axe to grind ( Minton obviously an academic lefty).
As my namesake pointed out common sense is not beyond politics. Its where a political viewpoint is so accepted it appears to be obviously common sense.
You can't pass it off as relevant - we are all programmed to be conservative and resistant to aspects of change that we deem to be less good than we're used to, which is backwards. As I said earlier a lot of people would love servants as long as they didn't have to pay for them.
It comes down to whether prevention is better than cure, and where prevention starts and ends.