That Tintin on the moon greeting Armstrong was sent to him as a congratulatory card. Apparently Armstrong was baffled as he had never heard of Tintin.There was a French illustrated book about the Moon landings. That cartoon of Tintin greeting Neil Armstrong could be its cover.View attachment 214103
Ils Ont Marche sur la Lune. It's a work of art.
why is it being picketed by ghosts?
Who you gonna call?It’s the long exposure times needed for the photo.
Funny, that: people often say the same as they're climbing into the passenger seat of my carI flew a TF-104S-ASA at NATO TLP (from the front seat!). By that stage it had a very good Stability Augmentation System but still had to be flown with 100% focus 100% of the time. As we were strapping in, the Italian IP said to me, "Remember, if you make mistake we die."
I flew a TF-104S-ASA at NATO TLP (from the front seat!). By that stage it had a very good Stability Augmentation System but still had to be flown with 100% focus 100% of the time. As we were strapping in, the Italian IP said to me, "Remember, if you make mistake we die."
I wonder what the failure rate of the eventual F-85's would have been - apart from distressing....
In Hullo Russia, Goodby England, Derick Robson's novel about a Vulcan Squadron, the unofficial plan of most crews was to keep flying east till the fuel was gone , bail out and try to start a new, medieval level, life in the Steppes or Tibet...
And you still haven't found what you're looking for.never saw any U2's land in Cyprus as they weren't there " is that a U2"?
"you didnt seen anything ok "
Remembering listening to an old chap saying you could see the v2 falling a black dot and a vapour trail and then a boom.Target accuracy wasn't an issue, particularly, for either V1 or V2 - mostly because they couldn't guarantee much in the way of accuracy to start with. V1 relied on techniques that were dependent on prevailing weather, and accurate reports of landings (which were in the hands of almost-entirely-turned German agents), V2 was more indiscriminate, and was pretty much just sub-orbital dead reckoning.
The point of both weapons was that they were not so much strategic as "terror" weapons - so an indiscriminate pattern served their purpose very well. Ironically, the (strategic) aim of misleading Germany that they were falling short tended to increase the (terror) component as V1s started falling on leafy Surrey villages and cosy South London suburbia,
WTF is that beast?