Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Cold War Aviation Porn

wasn't it a bit odd to base tankers so far forward?
I was assuming that the tankers were regarded as pretty much as expendable as the bombers - presumably, they all took off roughly the same time, and either topped off the bombers there and then, or did it nearer the target? When did they switch from high-level flying to nap of the earth stuff?
 
I was assuming that the tankers were regarded as pretty much as expendable as the bombers - presumably, they all took off roughly the same time, and either topped off the bombers there and then, or did it nearer the target? When did they switch from high-level flying to nap of the earth stuff?

i hadn't thought about the tankers supporting the V force, more about them supporting the tacticals. i think low level came in the mid-60's, were the v-force based in Germany then, or where they in the UK?
 
01DA095A-FA4C-4699-9D9E-AC5725CF1F84.jpeg
The Vickers Valiant. The first of the V Bombers. Used to drop bombs in the Suez Crisis in 1956. It too was utilised as a tanker before being withdrawn from service in 1964. Corrosion was found in the wing spars and refits were too costly. Though by then the RAF had the Victors and Vulcans in service.
This was the only V-Bomber to actually drop armed nuclear bombs.
 
Flying in a nuclear bomber sounds about as appealing as being tank crew or in a submarine. Urgh. I need to feel the earth between my feet and wind in my wavy locks in any war thanks.
 
:mad:

This is a Corsair. Upstarts!

View attachment 217477

There were two other Corsairs before that one.

O2U:

9344L.jpg


SBU:

13004L.jpg
 
Well I never.

Bendy wing Corsair is best Corsair.

There is a mint one for sale here in Australia:


It wasn't called the "Ensign Eliminator" for nothing...
 
There is a mint one for sale here in Australia:


It wasn't called the "Ensign Eliminator" for nothing...

Tricky to fly were they?

Sorry for slight derail everyone but look at this. Only $3.4m...It is a 1951 model so technically Cold War.

I'll stop now.

1592050422835.png
 
There is a mint one for sale here in Australia:


It wasn't called the "Ensign Eliminator" for nothing...

Tiny bit out of my price bracket, but shitting hell, I need this one, it'd look lovely in grey. Anyone fancy chipping in and we can start a gun running business? Only the good guys supplied.

 
Tiny bit out of my price bracket, but shitting hell, I need this one, it'd look lovely in grey. Anyone fancy chipping in and we can start a gun running business? Only the good guys supplied.


Good guys are cheap - fuck'em, I've got ex-wives to support!

I like that DC-3. I think it would look cool running poppy seed cakes through the Caucasus with a GPMG on a bungy sticking out the door...
 
In November 1959 we were homeward bound from a Christmas Island detachment with a Hastings transport aircraft when we were diverted to Harmon USAF base in Newfoundland due to bad weather at Goose Bay and I was surprised to see a very long line of KC-97 in-flight refuelling aircraft parked there. We night-stopped, and chatting with some of the KC-97 crews in the Club that evening we were told that their role in the event of the Cold War turning hot was to get airborne immediately and head north-east out over the Atlantic until the B-57 nuclear strike force overtook them and picked up extra fuel. They were to offload until they were down to absolute minima themselves and then to turn back westwards and ditch.

They had loads of arctic sea survival gear in the upper lobes of their fuselages but I didn’t really envy them their task.
 
I believe that the U.S. Navy cut down their F-4 carrier landing accident rate considerably by adopting the Royal Navy Seafire final approach technique of a continuous turn keeping the deck in sight until wings-level at touchdown.
 
They were supposed to be quite difficult to land due to poor visibility. Obviously not ideal for a carrier based aircraft.

I thought that may be the case, the old warbirds do have long bonnets and the F4 is particularly lengthy.

"Our" Spitfire lands in much the same way Lancman describes so it can see the runway till the last moment, maybe not as severe as the Seafire as he's only landing in a field in Cambridgeshire rather than a carrier.
 
Back
Top Bottom