Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Central London mob attacks people in Hyde park

The world, anything whatsover, instead of being a laughing stock. You presumably have goals because you obviously believe something, but you are completely and utterly ineffectual. As you are, you may as well not exist.

This is entertainment on U75, nothing else. I have said many times this is like chatting down the pub, provocative, funny, shouty etc...

Nobody exists here - its virtual.

The serious stuff is on my blog.:):D
 
This is entertainment on U75, nothing else. I have said many times this is like chatting down the pub, provocative, funny, shouty etc...

Nobody exists here - its virtual.

The serious stuff is on my blog.:):D

You're just taking the piss then. That makes more sense.
 
Dimwit. This is correct;

"I think it is disingenious to suggest that Attica advocates violence against women, or indeed, that he excuses physical assaults against women."

All you are is stupid right wing shite.:p

Are you really that fucking thick? You were the one that said it was "worth a punch", nobody else. You can't use somebody else's quote in your defence when your own post stated something completely different, you stupid cunt!
 
This is entertainment on U75, nothing else. I have said many times this is like chatting down the pub, provocative, funny, shouty etc...

But down the pub you would have been decked by now, to applause from the crowds.
 
I think it is disingenious to suggest that Attica advocates violence against women, or indeed, that he excuses physical assaults against women. I'm not sure that was his point at all. If he thought beating girls was okay, I'd have had him on ignore long ago.

To be fair, it helps to frame Attica's original post in the context of his wider beliefs and his perception of the class struggle and the role of police in 'society'.

Attica wouldn't be doing his 'job' if he didn't find and exploit instances of police brutality, or heavy-handed policing.

...and let's face it: it's scientifically proven that 8 out 10 dog owners, I mean coppers, are cunts. You have to be a cunt to want to be a copper: probably cos the army and the Scouts wouldn't have you.

No Pasaran!

that's a tenner please, Attica me old china :D

He understands why one would lay out a woman for the cime of gettingv a £3 primark t-shirt wet :rolleyes:
 
Can I just say that the lad that hit this girl looks like a teenager himself. Not a defence I know but he deserves the same 'he's young and stupid' leniency that is seemingly being given to her.

He should not have hit her IMO but what the hell was she thinking really?
 
Originally Posted by STFC
Seems straightfroward enough to me. I fucking hate people who hit women or think it's ok to hit women.

Dimwit. This is correct;

"I think it is disingenious to suggest that Attica advocates violence against women, or indeed, that he excuses physical assaults against women."

All you are is stupid right wing shite.:p








.
 
Across the three threads that Attica is currently entertaining me on, I am going to let everyone know, for entertainment value, that he has sent me a PM with a single word in it – wanker. :eek: / :rolleyes:

Wow – what a man, not. :D
 
You are lying Attica. You said it was worth a punch and you knew the recipient of said punch was a woman.

As a matter of interest does it make a difference to you whether it's a woman or a man? Everyone keeps going on about "hitting a woman". This implies it wouldn't be so bad if it were a man.
 
As a matter of interest does it make a difference to you whether it's a woman or a man? Everyone keeps going on about "hitting a woman". This implies it wouldn't be so bad if it were a man.

It's a product of my childhood that it's even worse of it's a woman who gets hit, but unacceptable even if it's a man.
 
You are lying Attica. You said it was worth a punch and you knew the recipient of said punch was a woman.

There is a difference between arguing about the respective worth of damage in terms of punishment generally, and to a specific individual. I do think that if somebody deliberately ruins an expensive shirt on a night out, then a punch is probably enough punishment. Others would, can and do give a kicking.

But I also do not want to fall into the sexist trap of treating people differently because of their gender. Equality means taking responsibility and in this case she wasn't very responsible, she was reckless in fact with other peoples stuff. I understand that bloke if he pushed her over, that seems at least equal and fair to what a bloke should expect for the same 'offence' i would have thought. That sort of anti social behaviour I have no time for.
 
I was brought up to believe that it's never ok to hit a female under any circumstances, horrible right winger that I am.
 
I can understand this. But it was wrong to be violent because someone wet/stained your tee-shirt surely?

Not if it cost a load of cash. In the wider world of central Doncaster/sheffield/Boro/Newcastle etc ruining a shirt deliberately is an invite to a fight on fri and sat nights... not just a punch.
 
Back
Top Bottom