durruti02 said:not 'wrong' but 'sad'??? wtf! .. pure semantics mate .. if it is sad it is wrong and you should oppose it .. have some bottle ..
on the other hand tbh i think i caught you out and you are digging yourself deeper
either way it is liberal .. most of capitalism is 'sad' and or 'wrong' .. the point is to develop, to defend, to create opposition. IF we genuinley want to help these people it will not be thinking it all so sad but creating a new movement out of who we have here and now ..
tbaldwin said:Thank you so much...Mr VP.I really have learnt a lot from the likes of you and 2 braincells nino....Its been a real education! I bet your front rooms look like libraries cos your both awwfully clever.
"A lot of the time" doesn't alter the context at all, you're still saying that I speak sense ("a lot of the time") but give inadequate answers.durruti02 said:Originally Posted by durruti02
FAQs??? .. they seem to be about not doing 'personal abuse' as it happens .. maybe you should check them out ..
Did you miss the bit about "robust language" being entirely acceptable?
Quote:
your swearing and abuse actually only emphaises your inadequate answers, sadly, as you too speak sense a lot of the time
I speak sense but give inadequate answers?
That makes, well, NO sense.
doh VP .. note " a lot of the time" .. no contradiction at all ..
Hey, don't let your conscience overwhelm you, feel absolutely free to report me. In fact I insist that you report me whenever I'm offensive. I wouldn't want you to have to suffer my horridness if it's that vile, disgusting and unbearable.p.s. robust is differrent to the nonsense you regularly come out with .. seriously mate you overdo it .. not neccessary .. if i was the reporting sort id report it but im not :-D
durruti02 said:no eply to this??
"If it is sad, it is wrong"?durruti02 said:not 'wrong' but 'sad'??? wtf! .. pure semantics mate .. if it is sad it is wrong and you should oppose it .. have some bottle ..
You thought wrong then.on the other hand tbh i think i caught you out and you are digging yourself deeper
But if things don't make you sad, upset you or piss you off, even if those things aren't legally or morally "wrong", then you're never going to have the impetus to change, to develop, to defend in the first place, are you?either way it is liberal .. most of capitalism is 'sad' and or 'wrong' .. the point is to develop, to defend, to create opposition. IF we genuinley want to help these people it will not be thinking it all so sad but creating a new movement out of who we have here and now ..
ViolentPanda said:And balders? people like you never learn anything. You know why? because you're already sure you know it all.
tbaldwin said:Thank you doctor that's very very profound...You really do seem to have such great insight.
ViolentPanda said:It's my glasses.
You should have gone to SpecSavers, balders.
tbaldwin said:I was on my way there but got caught in between a conundrum and a dilemna.. And being a thick OIK i had no idea about any of it,Doc!
ViolentPanda said:Poor balders, trying to play the class card again. "Thick OIK" indeed!
Thing is, playing the class card only works when the people you play it on aren't of the same class as you.
Still, if it makes you feel better to think that you're a poor working class victim of the evil middle classes, you go ahead.
ViolentPanda said:Still, if it makes you feel better to think that you're a poor working class victim of the evil middle classes, you go ahead.
tbaldwin said:I dont know does it?
Are you sure thats OK?
Which one?ViolentPanda said:If you don't know, ask your missus.
ViolentPanda said:if you insist.
"If it is sad, it is wrong"?
How do you make that out?
If something is wrong it is either legally or morally transgressive.
If something is sad it's neither of those things. It may be regrettable, and in the case of migrant labour it IS[/I] regrettable that people will lose a method of helping themselves, but given that it as things stand it isn't illegal or seen as particularly morally reprehensible by many people (myself not included) to want to control immigration, then as I said, "wrong" is the wrong word.
You thought wrong then.
try again, and get up earlier next time.
But if things don't make you sad, upset you or piss you off, even if those things aren't legally or morally "wrong", then you're never going to have the impetus to change, to develop, to defend in the first place, are you?
Give me bloody strength.
ViolentPanda said:If you don't know, ask your missus.
durruti02 said:i thought you were his missus!!! .. aaah maybe ex!! that would make more sense the way you keep following him!
durruti02 said:no sorry mate don't get it .. if it is sad .. (and i have no problem with that word ) .. it is also wrong .. and should be treated as wrong simple as .. to say something is JUST sad , is to just shrug your shoulders .. and that IS sad ..
ViolentPanda said:Poor balders, trying to play the class card again. "Thick OIK" indeed!
Thing is, playing the class card only works when the people you play it on aren't of the same class as you.
Still, if it makes you feel better to think that you're a poor working class victim of the evil middle classes, you go ahead.
tbaldwin said:Funny you and nino keep missing the point which is not "Im working class your not ner ner ner"
The point is about the hypocrisy of sections of the middle class left who pretend to love the people they look down their noses at.