Well as their assertion appears to be that Cambridge Analytica was instrumental in the Leave campaign winning and Trump gaining power then yes I give a shit.
Maybe, I'd be interested to see (say) some serious evaluation of the Trump election campaign and their use of these tactics.I think you be overestimating the impact this had on both of those events.
I am amazed that anyone is surprised by this. It is an intrinsic part of FB's business model to monetise the data under their control and for them to say they didn't know what was going on is more than slightly disingenuous.
Hopefully this will equally shine a light on the political side of FB Corp and by extension your Alphabets etc. No way are they collecting all this data and only using it to sell advertising.
The thing is, I'm not certain the average person really cares. You and I know what's probably going on and recognize it as a problem. There's a lot of low information voters out there, who don't know, or care, as long as they get their chat and photo posting services. They're happy to fill out all those cute little surveys to find out what kind of dragon they might be. A lot of people are going to say, if you don't like it, don't use Facebook. That, of course, ignores the larger issues. Or, they all assume that's its someone else getting manipulated, not them, they're just too smart for that.
The other thing is, to my knowledge, they've not broken any laws. It's certainly ethically questionable, but probably fully legal, and certainly ripe for exploitation. I can't see any laws being written against it, because a few of us think its unethical.
It doesnt matter if lots of people dont care. Everyone caring is not required in order for there to be a legislative response to this shit in various countries. At the very least, all these stories are adding up to a distinct change of mood music when the mainstream talk about social media.
That might generally work, but the people likely to benefit the most from doing nothing are our lawmakers.
As I understand it, when people used the app to respond to a survey, they gave consent for access to all their data. Maybe they didn't read the fine print, maybe they did and didn't understand it, maybe they didn't know what it would be used for, maybe they didn't care. However, consenting also gave access to the same data of people on their "friends lists," who had not given consent. That's how they were able to amass so much data so quickly. One person does the survey, has 500 friends - say half of which don't have their security locked down, so that's 250 comprehensive data sets from one hit, thank you very much.Doing nothing is not entirely risk-free for them in this case either though. We'll see, I'm not making any big predictions but it is clear that there is increasing appetite to reign in the net giants on certain limited fronts at least. Maybe not that much in the USA, but I'm talking about the UK and Europe here too.
Doing nothing is not entirely risk-free for them in this case either though. We'll see, I'm not making any big predictions but it is clear that there is increasing appetite to reign in the net giants on certain limited fronts at least. Maybe not that much in the USA, but I'm talking about the UK and Europe here too.
Thumbs up for Bob Newhart. Thunbs down for stupid comment.
Thumbs up for Bob Newhart. Thunbs down for stupid comment.
Senior executives at Cambridge Analytica – the data company that credits itself with Donald Trump’s presidential victory – have been secretly filmed saying they could entrap politicians in compromising situations with bribes and Ukrainian sex workers
In an undercover investigation by Channel 4 News, the company’s chief executive Alexander Nix said the British firm secretly campaigns in elections across the world. This includes operating through a web of shadowy front companies, or by using sub-contractors.
In one exchange, when asked about digging up material on political opponents, Mr Nix said they could “send some girls around to the candidate’s house”, adding that Ukrainian girls “are very beautiful, I find that works very well”.
Those people aren't 'low information voters' - they're people who are in denial they've been played is all. No-one wants to think of themselves as a mug.The thing is, I'm not certain the average person really cares. You and I know what's probably going on and recognize it as a problem. There's a lot of low information voters out there, who don't know, or care, as long as they get their chat and photo posting services. They're happy to fill out all those cute little surveys to find out what kind of dragon they might be. A lot of people are going to say, if you don't like it, don't use Facebook.
I think they may well be finished over this.