Back in 2009, I asked why the authorities were spending so much time and public money pursuing Harry Redknapp over what seemed, in the scheme of things, to be a relatively inconsequential sum in unpaid income tax. In the context of what he had earned over the years, not to mention the millions of pounds he had already paid in tax, why didn’t they just ask him to write out a cheque for the amount they alleged he owed? From what I know about Harry, he’d have paid up willingly to avoid putting his family through the wringer.
Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs has no problem cutting deals with big corporations such as Vodafone, so why spend an astonishing £8 million and five years on this ultimately unsuccessful prosecution?
If they thought they had a rock solid case and a realistic chance of securing a conviction, why did they take so long to bring it to trial? The evidence presented to the jury was less than compelling and left plenty of room for reasonable doubt.
Justice delayed is justice denied, even though in this case Redknapp and his co-defendant Milan Mandaric were eventually found not guilty.
As I wrote more than two years ago, it’s a pity the authorities didn’t devote as much time and effort to investigating the wholesale theft of taxpayers’ money by Members of Parliament. Why wasn’t the Revenue concerned about MPs dishonestly ‘flipping’ their addresses to avoid paying tens of thousands of pounds in Capital Gains Tax? It’s not only HMRC that has questions to answer. How can the police justify a mob-handed dawn raid at Redknapp’s house, with a Sun photographer in tow?
There is never any excuse for battering on someone’s front door in the early hours of the morning unless there is an imminent risk they are about to commit a violent crime or flee the country.