He's leaving after Euro 2012 though isn't he? Think it's £6 million he's on,which I imagine makes him the highest paid International manager in the World.I seriously dont understand why Capello's contract renewal is even up for debate. He's been totally competent since he took over. He does need a massive pay-cut mind you. £4m a year is absurd.
His contract's up, yes. But not sure why they're not renewing it. He's been the most succesful England manager for a while, altho that isnt saying much I guess
Indeed. He's not even in the top 10.
Bet the FA are rethinking their stance on Capello at their meeting today now!
He pays what he wants, He pays what he wannnnts, Harry Redknapp, He pays what he wants
his skill lies in the transfer market,
1 down, 2 to go.Boot out Cappello & Terry and put 'arry in charge for the Euros.
He is good in the transfer market, but he's also a great motivator, organiser and gets the best out of average to good players.
Keep up at the back. He claimed in court that his earlier statement to a reporter was a lie and he only did it to get the reporter out of his hair. He has low regard for reporters for obvious reasons, lying to them would not bother him. It is possible and the jury accepted it. He was very assertive in the court that he was now telling the truth and referred to the fact that he was under oath. The thing that reinforces this is that the amount of tax avoided is minuscule compared to his enormous salary.Right, so it's the next morning - and I'm still baffled by his 'innocence'.
How much evidence do they need to convict someone? He flies to Monaco, sets up a secretive bank account, £190k is dropped into it by his boss, he admits to a reporter whos recording the conversation that it's a bung for the sale of Crouch.. how the hell did he manage to slip off the hook?
Keep up at the back. He claimed in court that his earlier statement to a reporter was a lie and he only did it to get the reporter out of his hair. He has low regard for reporters for obvious reasons, lying to them would not bother him. It is possible and the jury accepted it. He was very assertive in the court that he was now telling the truth and referred to the fact that he was under oath. The thing that reinforces this is that the amount of tax avoided is minuscule compared to his enormous salary.
But that was clearly untrue - how the hell would telling a NoTW reporter that he'd accepted a bung get the reporter out of his hair? At the very least it's a bizarre strategy as surely it would only encourage the reporter to dig even deeper.
If it was true would he really have told a NoTW reporter?
Just to check something I keep seeing thrown about loads, did he really say, under oath, that he's never sent an email, text message or fax in his life?
And this was accepted?
I know there are plenty of people of a certain age who don't 'do' technology, but I find it hard to believe that a Premier League manager / director of football involved in club and financial matters has never communicated using these mediums.
Chinny reckon, in fact.