sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Well he's turned this thread from a discussion about Brixton Splash into an argument where he has a say in who can argue......Any chance you could fuck off now, you boring cunt?
Well he's turned this thread from a discussion about Brixton Splash into an argument where he has a say in who can argue......Any chance you could fuck off now, you boring cunt?
Well he's turned this thread from a discussion about Brixton Splash into an argument where he has a say in who can argue......
Don't worry Im going to start a firestorm of threads on racism.
Because he can define the terms used and who argues and win the argument.....Because?
You really are completely delusional. You're not coming across as anything other than an obsessive bigot.Either way its going to be a test for this site. For me its a win win.
Ye gods! What the fuck is this shit if you are serious? Links? He could ask you for those/ I could provide you with links about me but who among us deserves to be that scrutinised and picked over? He doesn't speak for you? Speak for yourself.
You said earlier that you had hoped for a British Rosa Parks or whomever...BE that person...there is so much all of us can get behind and involved with..
Why don't you do that now.... This was meant to be a thread about SplashDon't worry Im going to start a firestorm of threads on racism.
Read what he's posted on this thread. If you still support him you're a fucking idiot.I hope Lee Jasper continues to hang around U75 - I for one find it enjoyable reading commentary from an in-your-face black advocate.
So that makes it ok then?there was something about some untoward communications with a woman; but the police said there was nothing criminal in what happened.
I got to page 7: does it change much after that? To that point, the thread reminded me of one of those carnival dunk tanks, with Jasper sitting on the collapsible board, and posters lining up to throw their best hardball at the dunk paddle.
Doing a bit of reading, Jasper appears rather an impressive figure - he seems to be someone who gets out in the public domain, and does things, takes action, against racism - as opposed to merely talking about it. As with anyone who takes the step of trying to do things, it hasn't been smooth sailing all the way - and as usual, there is no shortage of internet commentators available to point fingers.
As for the opinions of white U75ers: everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I can't help but think back to the many lectures I've received about the realities of black life. I find such situations useful in getting a better understanding of the parameters of white privilege, and of the many misconceptions and misunderstandings that persist.
I hope Lee Jasper continues to hang around U75 - I for one find it enjoyable reading commentary from an in-your-face black advocate.
No he didn't, he claimed that his "grab them by the pussy" comment was "locker room talk". And AFAIK he's not been charged with any criminal offence, which by your logic clears him.Trump admitted to sexually assaulting women. No, that's not ok.
No he didn't, he claimed that his "grab them by the pussy" comment was "locker room talk". And AFAIK he's not been charged with any criminal offence, which by your logic clears him.
Trump admitted to sexually assaulting women. No, that's not ok.
Has Trump been investigated by the police?
It appears that Jasper was investigated, and cleared.
No he didn't, he claimed that his "grab them by the pussy" .
Japser wanted to 'honey glaze' a married woman
I'm not sure what that means. Is it some sort of coded lingo for committing sexual assault?
I know what 'grab by the pussy' means. Also, 'kissing without consent'.
And yet the police have brought no charges so according to you nothing to see.Trump also talked about kissing women without their consent - a claim that was verified by a number of women.
And yet the police have brought no charges so according to you nothing to see.
In January, the London Development Agency, which provided the grants, cleared Jasper of improperly influencing their allocation. And although it found that 12 of the Standard's 16 allegations were unfounded, it did refer allegations that individuals had misappropriated funds to the police, as it had no powers to formally interview and investigate external parties.
Two weeks ago, Scotland Yard, which looked into the how the grants were given, said that Jasper had no criminal case to answer.
Japser wanted to 'honey glaze' a married woman in his 200 quid a night council funded hotel room then gave her 65k of public funds a few days later. How on earth can you justify that?