Gramsci
Well-Known Member
Seems a bit like you have found the name of a fairly senior Lambeth employee who attended the NLA thing, and then judged her on the basis of a quote that was in the article/press release about the NLA event.
And without any real knowledge about that person or how well they carry out their role or maybe any knowledge of what their role is (?), stated that they aren't worth the salary they are paid.
I don't have any special knowledge that allows me to argue for or against that ... but it seems a bit simplistic to suggest they can simply be dispensed with and replaced with playground managers. No doubt that would be good for the playgrounds, but someone then has to do the stuff that that employee was doing. Maybe everything they do is completely unnecessary - I don't know - but don't you have to make a bit more of an argument to demonstrate this? I spend enough of my time getting annoyed with Lambeth and what it does but like others have also pointed out, I realise they have a duty to implement all sorts of things that are determined by central government and that includes a lot of planning stuff. So, it means that people are in jobs where they implement unpopular things, but they are also the people who have to try and make the decisions so that certain bits of national policy are implemented in a way that is least bad for Lambeth (of course anyone can argue about how successful they are in that). For that reason, it doesn't seem sensible simply to dispense with that layer of people, or put any old people in those positions. I certainly wouldn't argue that having an "Oxford PPE" is necessary but neither would I say that it should rule someone out.
This seems to be a bit of a typical Brixton Forum thing of zeroing in on one quote, one person, one particular qualification and then extrapolating a whole load of stuff in a bit of a silly way.
Obviously an event like that NLA one is going to generate various quotes that are good fodder for here.
I don't think you've read my posts .
I've actually done the opposite. Go back and read my posts properly.
In short I've said the problem is systemic in how the system works.
I haven't zoned in on an individual.
I btw wasn't saying they can be replaced by playground managers. What I do feel is that important, in many ways , more socially necessary work like helping children is grossly undervalued in a society like this.
That the way the system works is that certain jobs , that can be filled with a certain type of person, are grossly overvalued and given to much status and importance in a society like this.
I could go on. But it's late
Last edited: