What kind of interest are you looking for?
I think lots of people would agree that gentrification is something that happens under capitalism and might say that's just stating the obvious. The more difficult question is what to do about it - are you hoping for people to read your post and become revolutionary socialists? What might get more interest is suggestions about how to intervene in the system to lessen the impact. Some people want to intervene by having a go at individual businesses - I don't think that's very productive and am more interested in things like changes to housing and planning policy, which don't rely on overthrowing capitalism.
How about this list:
Bring back rent controls on private landlords.
Make big organisations like Network Rail give proper tenancies to all. Looks to me like if all the small business had secure leases like the pawnshop then NR would not have got away with kicking them out.
So rent controls of leases with much greater security.
Property owners for to long now have had carte Blanche to hike up rents on housing and business premises. The balance of power must be put back towards private renters of accomodation and small business who rent from property owners.
Get rid of viability as reason to reduce social housing element of large private housing schemes.
When Councils put into planning guidelines that 50% affordable on large schemes is required this actually is done. If property developers don't like it then that's there problem.
If they throw a hissy fit and leave land undeveloped for three years then Council should be able to CPO land at cost. Not at price hiked up as though it was going to be profitable housing development.
And on private big developments get rid of this "intermediate" housing as qualifying for affordable. Its not. The 50% should be social rents same as Council rents. The hit to profits being bourne by developer.
On Capitalism. Well I need to dig out my old post. Based on reading David Harvey , the Marxist geographer.
I did say, what I thought was realistic option. Supporting a Corbyn/ McDonnell led radical socialist government. They aren't going to overthrow Capitalism straight away but use State power to regulate it. Unlike New Labour.
The difference is between Corbyn confront and regulate and Chuka. Chuka TIG is remodeling the "centre" ground. Chuka would agree with all the issues but baulk at prospect of confronting Capital.
Which is required.
Chuka would say he is just as concerned as Corbyn about the "system". Its that the politics that Corbyn/ McDonnell represent is to much hard left intervention.
I would say that Chuka whilst saying he agrees with all the problems , doesn't really want to do the hard line measures to change the balance of power between Capital and Labour.
I've even seen this in the XR rebellion. Whilst supporting Green New Deal, which is socialist, they are so worried about losing public support that there public message is that they are "beyond politics"
The answers to todays problems are socialist. This does not mean necessarily revolutionary change as in Russian Revolution . It does imo mean a drastic change in power between Capital and the other 99%. Which will be opposed.
