Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton news, rumour and general chat - October 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah i don't go there cos it's so expensive and not really that much cop anyway, but i was actually referring to Fish Lounge on Brixton Hill...30p for a sachet of tomato ketchup.
Yeah, the price stuck in my mind. He waived it though. It's maybe in case someone takes the piss and asks for 10
 
I understand there was a demo by Young Lives Matter marching through central Brixton around 1 pm today.
Friend of mine (who probably doesn't post on here) showed me a photo taken from Effra Court.
Seems they started at Kennington Park and marched to Brockwell Park.

I appreciate it isn't the goût du jour on here, but I do admire Pastor Mimi and her fellow activists who are trying to do consciousness raising on knife and gun crime and bring it to an end.
View attachment 93669

Lovely people. They were in Windrush Square at the same time as the "Stand Up to Lambeth Council" people were gathering to start their march to Clapham Common.
 
Somerleyton was due to be 300 or more completely new places for rent.

I haven't been following Cressingham Gardens and Fenwick Estate very closely, but I believe the council claim a small increase (less than 30) at Cressingham, and not sure at all about Fenwick. For some reason Fenwick residents don't seem to be protesting, despite their estate being completely knocked down and rebuilt. Possibly there are not many leaseholders there. The leaseholders are the people who are really being hit by the regeneration schemes all over London because the compensation level does not track property values.

Fenwick were pretty much steam-rollered. I phoned a contact on Fenwick last year and asked "Do you know there's a demolition notice for Fenwick in the Public Notices section of the Lambeth Weekender?". He didn't.
He phoned me back the next day and reckoned he'd knocked on around 50 doors, and no-one knew anything about demolition or a demolition notice, all they knew about was some fuzzy talk about regeneration. The poor buggers had the wind knocked out of them, but they are fighting back, and the other regeneration estates are giving them practical help and social support. Some of them turned out for the "Stand Up to Lambeth Council" march, too. :)
 
He didnnt to a couple of people I know - they were quite shocked but went into Morleys and asked nicely and got some ketchup.

I'd never get ketchup with fish and chips, but those little blister packs of tartar sauce usually tend to be about that price wherever you go. I'm not sure if ketchup should be priced differently.

Agree with Olley's being overpriced muck and Knight's Hill being top notch.
 
We need a sticky thread for the bi-monthly fish and chip chat.

- Olleys is rubbish
- Jimmy's has big portions
- The new ones on Brixton Hill and Acre Lane are quite nice actually but I prefer Jimmys/Kens/Something else

Would keep things nice and tidy
 
They did sweet f*** all ealier in the night when a lady got her bag snatched by KFC by a young man on a bike who peddled off down cold harbour lane. She gave chase but he was long gone.
37D4117A00000578-3770597-image-a-19_1472813837025.jpg


37D410DB00000578-3770597-image-a-38_1472816215580.jpg

They've got other priorities.
 
Way too harsh on Olley's. The chips are greatly improved. Fish always good.
The chips in the Acre Lane shop are tasteless.
Agree about Ken's chips, they are like when I was a kid. Gorgeous.
We need a sticky thread for the bi-monthly fish and chip chat.

- Olleys is rubbish
- Jimmy's has big portions
- The new ones on Brixton Hill and Acre Lane are quite nice actually but I prefer Jimmys/Kens/Something else

Would keep things nice and tidy
 
I'd never get ketchup with fish and chips, but those little blister packs of tartar sauce usually tend to be about that price wherever you go. I'm not sure if ketchup should be priced differently.

Agree with Olley's being overpriced muck and Knight's Hill being top notch.

Really? I'd never seen them above 10p.
 
We need a sticky thread for the bi-monthly fish and chip chat.

- Olleys is rubbish
- Jimmy's has big portions
- The new ones on Brixton Hill and Acre Lane are quite nice actually but I prefer Jimmys/Kens/Something else

Would keep things nice and tidy

Thornton heath is where the chips are at.
 
37D4117A00000578-3770597-image-a-19_1472813837025.jpg


37D410DB00000578-3770597-image-a-38_1472816215580.jpg

They've got other priorities.
The cops round here do plenty of good every day, although it might not fit your narrative.

I saw that fly on the wall with the Brixton police and when that kid, whose parents own the Bombay, was stabbed up in the Roupell estate, those two cops did everything they could for him, giving their all to save his life before the ambulance came, coming away covered in his blood.

During his last minutes, he had good people with him.
 
Way too harsh on Olley's. The chips are greatly improved. Fish always good.
The chips in the Acre Lane shop are tasteless.
Agree about Ken's chips, they are like when I was a kid. Gorgeous.

Olley's sell a piece of deep-fried (frozen) haddock for £8.20; their staff are on minimum wage. They keep costs down by using only one waitress in the restaurant during the day. Don't know if you've been in there recently, but I can assure you that she earns her pay. Fuck them.
 
I did an ad hoc count as they moved off from Windrush and crossed the road, and I made it 290-ish give or take - not including the dozen coppers in attendance.
The Blog have excelled themselves on this one, sneering away at those who bothered to get involved in the campaign (just 200 according to their writer) and leading with a sensationalist spin on a campaigner who was supposedly "violently dismantling a Labour Party stall."

As is often the case, there's more substance and more accurate reporting in the readers' comments.

Pink protest challenges council
 
The Blog have excelled themselves on this one, sneering away at those who bothered to get involved in the campaign (just 200 according to their writer) and leading with a sensationalist spin on a campaigner who was supposedly "violently dismantling a Labour Party stall."

As is often the case, there's more substance and more accurate reporting in the readers' comments.

Pink protest challenges council

That's a pretty poor article.

The "rocks to their ankles" comment was too much though. If there's really a desire to get a broad coalition of people involved and actively campaigning against the council then I dont think comments like that help.
 
The Blog have excelled themselves on this one, sneering away at those who bothered to get involved in the campaign (just 200 according to their writer) and leading with a sensationalist spin on a campaigner who was supposedly "violently dismantling a Labour Party stall."

As is often the case, there's more substance and more accurate reporting in the readers' comments.

Pink protest challenges council

I love the point-by point corrections! :D
 
The Blog have excelled themselves on this one, sneering away at those who bothered to get involved in the campaign (just 200 according to their writer) and leading with a sensationalist spin on a campaigner who was supposedly "violently dismantling a Labour Party stall."

As is often the case, there's more substance and more accurate reporting in the readers' comments.

Pink protest challenges council
I think in Brixton we sometimes have to live with invective or strong rhetoric.

This part of the article has caused some agro:

"a member of the extreme left-wing Revolutionary Communist Group (RCG) set off a social media storm by saying that leaders of the council’s Labour Party administration should be “thrown into the Thames with rocks tied round their ankles"

The suggestion of throwing the council leaders into the Thames was hypebole not a threat, in the sense that it wasn't going to happen.

I personally believe this apparent follower of Marx was mis-quoting Matthew 18 v6:
"But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

English is a funny language - most things derive from the Bible or Shakespeare as devotees of Desert Island Discs will be well aware.
 
I think in Brixton we sometimes have to live with invective or strong rhetoric.

This part of the article has caused some agro:

"a member of the extreme left-wing Revolutionary Communist Group (RCG) set off a social media storm by saying that leaders of the council’s Labour Party administration should be “thrown into the Thames with rocks tied round their ankles"
I'm curious how they're quantifying this supposed "social media storm". That suggests thousands of posts. I suspect that is not true.
 
It's fair enough not to allow a load of clutter on the pavement - pavements are supposed to be for people to walk on, and what's there at the moment will block anyone trying to get through in a wheelchair or with a pram.
That said I would like similar enforcement to be taken against people who decide to park motor vehicle on the pavement.
I suggest SWU move their stuff onto the carriageway of the road instead.
 
I suggest SWU move their stuff onto the carriageway of the road instead.
That's a bit of a bird-brained suggestion. How about deliveries to the Beehive and Craft Beer? There are also a surprising number of vehicles parked under the rec. Closet motorists masquerading as GLL officials perhaps.

How about designating that piece of pavement as an art space?
(after having numerous expensive consultations done by several consultants - as is normal practice in Lambeth)
 
That's a bit of a bird-brained suggestion. How about deliveries to the Beehive and Craft Beer? There are also a surprising number of vehicles parked under the rec. Closet motorists masquerading as GLL officials perhaps.

I think beer deliveries are of lesser importance than keeping pavements accessible for people with mobility issues. So, if SWU want to put their stuff on the street I'd rather they put it there, whilst Lambeth decide what to do about it.
 
If I can be bothered I'll dig up some photos of how that space used to be: and it was mainly used as a dumping space for rubbish. It was as dead a zone as you could imagine so the notion that it's blocking anything is a bit daft - hardly anyone uses that road anyway (and there's almost zero traffic) and there's plenty of space all around. I think it's great that it's supplied a focus for the displaced cafe people and it brightens up a particularly dull area. Of course others may prefer something nice and shiny and soulless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom