Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Bloody Sunday 40th Anniversary..........

No chance of a truth commission any time soon all sides have not only blood on their hands but some very dirty secrets.
Including the Irish state.:(
 
No chance of a truth commission any time soon all sides have not only blood on their hands but some very dirty secrets.
Including the Irish state.:(
This true, but it is the British state that has the most to hide, probably followed by the Provisionals.
 
Did Brian Nelson end up in gaol? I can't remember. . .

CR - If all Michael C. got was Home Rule, how was the Free State able to stay neutral in 1939?

even in the first war and prior to the IRAs emergence as a guerrilla force Britian was unable to introduce conscription to Ireland. They didnt even dare introduce it themselves post 39 in the north . The free state stayed neutral because Develera would have been most likely put up against a wall by his own had he joined the empires cause, and because out of sensible realpolitik Britian didnt force the issue.
Theyre pretty much apologising for their neutrality today though .
 
The IRSP have supported the challenge by Richard O Rawe to leading members of the Provisional movement, including Gerry Adams to take a polygraph to find out who is telling the truth over claims that 4 of the hunger strikers were allowed to die in order for Sinn Fein to maximise the support it was getting from around the world, and that an offer by the British government to end the hunger strike was neither passed to the prisoners themselves or to the representatives of the INLA prisoners.

http://www.nuzhound.com/articles/br...-detector_challenge___SBreen_Sunday-World.php

If they put a lie detector on Gerry Adams it would explode into flames in about 4 seconds.
 
even in the first war and prior to the IRAs emergence as a guerrilla force Britian was unable to introduce conscription to Ireland. They didnt even dare introduce it themselves post 39 in the north . The free state stayed neutral because Develera would have been most likely put up against a wall by his own had he joined the empires cause, and because out of sensible realpolitik Britian didnt force the issue.
Theyre pretty much apologising for their neutrality today though .

when you look at how far he did go and under what circumstances, i don't think there's much to apologise for.

but i think the commiserations on hitler's death tend to piss people off even if they can sort of understand the neutrality.
 
Neutrality fair one although doing an Italy and joining the allies in 44 would probably been a good thing to do signing hitlers commiseration book insane.
 
when you look at how far he did go and under what circumstances, i don't think there's much to apologise for.

but i think the commiserations on hitler's death tend to piss people off even if they can sort of understand the neutrality.

it was only diplomatic protocol with germany , and most likely to camouflage from his own support base the active assistance he'd provided to Britian in secret . Which would have caused uproar had it been widely known . The British were much chummier with hitler when he was alive . Joining the allies at any stage would have signed devs death warrant most likely . The firm policy -outwardly at least - was neutrality . The people had had enough of cannon fodder for other peoples wars .

Like it or not Fianna Fail as a party , particularly at that time, were pretty much organised around and dependent upon the demobilised "Old IRA" structures . Which werent that long demobilised. The political situation was so volatile he found it difficult to trust his own army and even police whod been vicious adversaries in a civil war only a few years earlier . Turmoil at the top could have preceded another , and possibly invasion .
He had to create a part time reserve army and fill it with his own largely ex IRA people just to keep the Eire regulars and police from having any funny ideas about regime change .The vast majority of those people , despite their distaste for nazism and fascism , were quite happy to see Britian get a bloody nose or a comeuppance at the hands of whoever . And most certainly viewed the occupation of the north as unfinished business.

There was no way they could or would have joined the British war effort without massive internal upheavals and most likely another civil war.
 
oh yes, i know it was the protocol, but my feelings are that there are fewer people in britain that understand that than understand why ireland remained neutral.

i'm also aware of how much support dev did give the british, more than a lot of british feel comfortable giving him credit for. and how he turned down churchill's offer of the north, iirc partially on the grounds he always said the north would have to want to join before he took them. the man was walking a bloody tightrope, but he always was quite good at that.
 
it was only diplomatic protocol with germany , and most likely to camouflage from his own support base the active assistance he'd provided to Britian in secret . Which would have caused uproar had it been widely known . The British were much chummier with hitler when he was alive . Joining the allies at any stage would have signed devs death warrant most likely . The firm policy -outwardly at least - was neutrality . The people had had enough of cannon fodder for other peoples wars .

Like it or not Fianna Fail as a party , particularly at that time, were pretty much organised around and dependent upon the demobilised "Old IRA" structures . Which werent that long demobilised. The political situation was so volatile he found it difficult to trust his own army and even police whod been vicious adversaries in a civil war only a few years earlier . Turmoil at the top could have preceded another , and possibly invasion .
He had to create a part time reserve army and fill it with his own largely ex IRA people just to keep the Eire regulars and police from having any funny ideas about regime change .The vast majority of those people , despite their distaste for nazism and fascism , were quite happy to see Britian get a bloody nose or a comeuppance at the hands of whoever . And most certainly viewed the occupation of the north as unfinished business.

There was no way they could or would have joined the British war effort without massive internal upheavals and most likely another civil war.
what're your feelings on the 40,000 or so irishmen who joined the british forces in the second world war?
 
i think neither he nor the irish people would have trusted churchills offer for a second . Theyd been down the road of promises after wars before . Even the labour government that came after him, as we can see from their cabinet papers , viewed the north as strategically vital to british interests .
 
i think neither he nor the irish people would have trusted churchills offer for a second . Theyd been down the road of promises after wars before . Even the labour government that came after him, as we can see from their cabinet papers , viewed the north as strategically vital to british interests .

my view:

i think churchill would have offered anything to get what he wanted out of dev, he might even have intended to deliver some of it. but I don't think he could have delivered the north to dublin's control even if he had tried. and dev wasn't an idiot. he knew that.

but nothing will really make much difference to those in britain that are utterly convinced that the irish were all supporting the germans during both wars.

as for the irish fascists, didn't the blueshirts manage to shoot each other in spain?
 
as for the irish fascists, didn't the blueshirts manage to masacre themselves in spain?

they didnt even manage that . They opened fire on a patrol of black faced moors on the assumption that if they were blacks they must be communists, killing a few of them . Got sent to the rear in disgrace . Spent their time in the rear drinking and brawling with anyone who came near them and then got sent home.
 
they didnt even manage that . They opened fire on a patrol of black faced moors on the assumption that if they were blacks they must be communists, killing a few of them . Got sent to the rear in disgrace . Spent their time in the rear drinking and brawling with anyone who came near them and then got sent home.

impressive.
 
in fairness though very few of them were actual fascists . Most i suspect were simply bored out of their minds, adventurous , pious and easily led . And horny. Farmhands in the main tired of a dreary life . And directly encouraged to go by the same middle class and bourgouis political forces that encouraged thousands of others to join the British army in its big escapade .
Their chaplain was a rabid nazi , who died in Germany in the 40s while working for the nazis. He used to scream at them about not only their drunkenness but their fondness for the brothels . Noting that during the first weeks only 5 of them were seen entering brothels ,but later it was 40 a week at least . Subsequently some of them had enough of his berating and open fire on him.

ODuffy himself was rarely seen without a bottle of whiskey at close hand , and his aide de camp later wrote his memoirs should be entitled "drunk in Iberia"

ODuffys people were in totalal disarray with zero discipline . 3 of them were killed in an action at the front and they simply refused to go on another assault ,viewing it as suicidal . Many of them were also genuinely disgusted with the fascist atrocities theyd witnessed . And at one stage one of their officers informed a fascist general he was going to take the brigade home and re-enlist on the socialist side . Almost getting them all shot and himself imprisoned .

Franco couldnt wait to see the back of them.
 
no real feelings about them at all really . Except that if Britian had invaded the rest of the country theyd have been massacring their own people for resisting.
yes because there's no tradition of mutiny among irish regiments in the british army over events in ireland; the mutiny in the connaught rangers had nothing to do with the black and tans i suppose :rolleyes:

do you have anything to suggest that at any point in the war an invasion of the 26 cos was seriously on the cards?
 
[quote="Pickman's model, post: 10908654, member:
yes because there's no tradition of mutiny among irish regiments in the british army over events in ireland; the mutiny in the connaught rangers had nothing to do with the black and tans i suppose :rolleyes:

many of the black and tans were Irish . And the croke park massacre wasnt carried out by British soldiers like it showed in the film but by the regular Royal Irish Constabulary . Virtually 100% Irish .

do you have anything to suggest that at any point in the war an invasion of the 26 cos was seriously on the cards?

even prior to the war Churchill had made it clear his firm intent would be to retake the treaty ports in the event of war breaking out in europe . That of course would have necessitated occupying , subduing and dominating the territory around them . Which of course would have meant all out escalation and a major guerilla war that would have entailed war time massacres .

On VE day itself , churchills broadcast was particularly scathing of Irish neutrality , accusing the Irish of "frolicking with the germans" He made clear that it had been Britians instinct to invade all along but that theyd shown remarkable "restraint" in not doing so . So he made the point had they invaded, which they considered, it would have been fully justified in his view .

Its quite likely this "restraint" had a lot to do with 500,000 Irishmen enlisting to defend neutrality and the protracted guerilla war , probably german assisted ,that would surely have followed. Its thought that the Russian objection to Ireland joining the UN was part of a vengeful deal arrived at between Britian and Russia at Yalta . And that its refusalof admission to the UN left it still open to invasion at a period in which an imminent third war seemed quite possible .

Devs very restrained rebuttal of Churchills threats in a radio broadcast shortly afterwards earned him a lot of praise.

Mr. Churchill makes it clear that in certain circumstances he would have violated our neutrality and that he would justify his action by Britain’s necessity. It seems strange to me that Mr. Churchill does not see that this, if accepted, would mean that Britain’s necessity would become a moral code and that when this necessity became sufficiently great, other people’s rights were not to count….this same code is precisely why we have the disastrous succession of wars… shall it be world war number three?


The Stormont prime minister was also pushing hard at the British cabinet for an all out invasion , urging the use of scottish troops .
Montgomery revealed in his memoirs “I was told to prepare plans for the seizure of Cork and Queenstown in southern Ireland so the harbours could be used as naval bases.”



So it seems to have been highly likely as a possibility .
 
Cheers Cas Red - very interesting stuff that I didn't know very much about.

With regards to the Irish fighting in the world war - my grandad was a staunch republican who enlisted in the american army as a motorcycle dispatch rider in the 1st World War rather then fight for the British.
 
many of the black and tans were Irish . And the croke park massacre wasnt carried out by British soldiers like it showed in the film but by the regular Royal Irish Constabulary . Virtually 100% Irish .
there's some confusion on this point. according to anne dolan's article 'killing and bloody sunday, november 1920' from the historical journal 49.3 (2006), p. 791 http://webir.tcd.ie/bitstream/2262/57090/1/Killing and Bloody Sunday, November 1920.pdf it was the auxies what done it.

but according to 'dublin's fighting story' (cork: mercier, 2009), pp. 292-3, the ric, auxiliaries and british regulars all joined in.
 
i think you'll find that it was carried out by the auxiliaries, according to anne dolan's article 'killing and bloody sunday, november 1920' from the historical journal 49.3 (2006), p. 791 http://webir.tcd.ie/bitstream/2262/57090/1/Killing and Bloody Sunday, November 1920.pdf

are you going to argue that the auxies were 'virtually 100% irish'?

Id seriously question the authenticity of that article, blaming auxies and black and tans is a common misconception and perhaps an understandable desire to blame englishmen and scotsmen for a massacre carried out by Irishmen . From a force of which many of whom were later co-opted into the gardai .

On the day the auxiliaries certainly surrounded croke park - which was their job, to militarily back up the cops - and sealed off the exits but it was the regular RIC who went into it and opened fire . All eyewitness accounts of what happened make clear that although a mixed force of RIC and auxiliaries went to the park under the command of an auxiliary Major it was most certainly uniformed RIC and not auxiliaries or black and tans who did the vast bulk of the shooting inside . And that was just one atrocity they were directly responsible for . There were numerous other smaller ones .

The RIC , like the RUC, were never normal cops but organised from their inception along highly militarised lines . They were always a well armed paramilitary force from day one , never bobbies on a beat. Their reputation was so disgusting thats precisely why they were readily hunted down like dogs and shot , although there were certainly exceptions among them .

Remember it was the RIC , mostly catholic and often gaelic speakers , who evicted tens of thousands of their own people during the starvation of the 1840s . Not redcoats or hussars , good pious catholic gaelic speaking Irishmen often born and bred in the west and the gaeltacht .

While theres always an exception to the rule, the man who pays your wages is more often than not your boss . And while there would certainly have been many Irishmen in the British army whod have been deeply uncomfortable firing on their own people , and some whod have refused, there would have been plenty who would have done it if ordered to do so . There were literally thousands of Irishmen ,often nationalist , stationed in British army barracks in Ireland in 1916 but as far as i can ascertain only one joined the uprising while the rest had no problem putting it down .
Same in 1798 , 1803, Young Ireland rebellion , fenian rebellion .

sadly we can be quite a treacherous race .
 
Hang on a minute, wouldn't it have been Dublin Metropolitan Police (who were unarmed, though that didn't stop them killing three people during the lockout) not the RIC?
 
No . The DMP were mostly employed as a regular civil force , like London bobbies . They were a seperate force from the paramiltary RIC . They had access to arms but rarely ever carried them as they tended not to be used for anti insurgency duties unless in a dire emergency such as 1916 . They just werent structured for those type of operations. Their unarmed status meant they werent generally targetted by the IRA in that period unless one of them made a particular nuisance of himself.

The G Men however , the special intelligence detective branch in Dublin were part of the DMP though . And were routinely armed but plain clothed . They had the shit blown out of them regularly.
 
Id seriously question the authenticity of that article, blaming auxies and black and tans is a common misconception and perhaps an understandable desire to blame englishmen and scotsmen for a massacre carried out by Irishmen . From a force of which many of whom were later co-opted into the gardai .
On the day the auxiliaries certainly surrounded croke park - which was their job, to militarily back up the cops - and sealed off the exits but it was the regular RIC who went into it and opened fire . All eyewitness accounts of what happened make clear that although a mixed force of RIC and auxiliaries went to the park under the command of an auxiliary Major it was most certainly uniformed RIC and not auxiliaries or black and tans who did the vast bulk of the shooting inside . And that was just one atrocity they were directly responsible for . There were numerous other smaller ones .

The RIC , like the RUC, were never normal cops but organised from their inception along highly militarised lines . They were always a well armed paramilitary force from day one , never bobbies on a beat. Their reputation was so disgusting thats precisely why they were readily hunted down like dogs and shot , although there were certainly exceptions among them .
Remember it was the RIC , mostly catholic and often gaelic speakers , who evicted tens of thousands of their own people during the starvation of the 1840s . Not redcoats or hussars , good pious catholic gaelic speaking Irishmen often born and bred in the west and the gaeltacht .

While theres always an exception to the rule the man who pays your wages is more often than not your boss . And while there would certainly have been many Irishmen in the British army whod have been deeply uncomfortable firing on their own people , and some whod have refused, there would have been plenty who would have done it if ordered to do so . There were literally thousands of Irishmen ,often nationalist , stationed in British army barracks in Ireland in 1916 but as far as i can ascertain only one joined the uprising while the rest had no problem putting it down .
Same in 1798 , 1803, Young Ireland rebellion , fenian rebellion .

sadly we can be quite a treacherous race .
and 'dublin's fighting story'?

from 'with the ira in the fight for freedom':
a large number of auxiliaries and military arrived in lorries, surrounded the grounds and opened fire on players and spectators.
(p. 222)

from 'the black and tans' (richard bennett):
a plan was accordingly made to cordon off the ground with troops after the game had started, and to have the crowds systematically searched by police at the exits. so as to avert the danger of a stampede, an officer was to warn the crowd of what was to happen; but the company of black and tans from phoenix park, who were to carry out the search, arrived before the announcement had been made and were fired on by an ira picket patrolling the ground. the black and tans returned the fire. they killed one man walking with his fiancee, mortally wounded another and brought down a small boy who was sitting in a tree. a warning shot was fired from the crowd, and the black and tans began to shoot over the turnstiles. the intent and orderly spectators were at first stunned, and then broke into a cursing, screaming, frantic scramble of men, women and children. one player and eleven spectators were killed and many more injured in the stampede which made the search impossible, although thirty revolvers were found on the ground.
(p. 127)

from 'the irish revolution and its aftermath' (francis costello):
under the pretence of going to croke park to seek out suspects for the shooting of the british officers that morning, a large contingent of the ric, followed by british army regulars, entered the field and stands at the outset of the game, and in short order commenced firing into the crowd, apparently without warning.
(p. 95)

from 'the troubles' (ulick o'connor)
at 3.15pm, a detachment of black and tans went to croke park sports ground, dublin, where an inter-county gaelic football match was in progress. ostensibly the tans were there to support a search for arms that was to be made among the crowd by the army.
but that their purpose was a grimmer one was soon clear. stationed on a railway wall at one end of the ground, a group of tans fired a machine-gun at random into the crowd. people panicked immediately and ran onto the field. but the firing continued. dead and wounded were lying all over the pitch. one of the players, wearing his green and gold jersey, had a bullet put through his forehead. in fact, the presence of the army probably prevented further massacres. a drunken black and tan had lined the teams up and was walking up and down in front of them with a revolver in his hand. an army officer came over and whispered to one of the team, 'he means to finish you all off.' the officer then went over to the tan and persuaded him to go away. the actual casualties that day were twelve dead and seventy wounded.
(pp. 186-7)

from 'sean treacy and the tan war' (joe ambrose):
dublin's bloody sunday - 21 november 1920 - divided into two parts. ... in the afternoon various british military forces (principally black and tans and auxiliaries) participated in the revenge attack on the teams and spectators attending a dublin/tipperary gaelic football match at croke park.
(p. 170)

from 'bloody sunday' (james gleeson):
the game was in full swing when the dreaded black and tans appeared suddenly on top of a wall enclosing one side of the ground. they had used ladders to scale the wall and were now dropping down into the football ground. they formed up into a rough line with rifles at their shoulders and then an officer on top of the wall fired a revolver shot. this was the signal for the first ragged volley from the police. the spectators were not at first alarmed. ... an auxiliary with a revolver in his hand ran to the door of one of [the changing rooms] and, brandishing his gun, shouted 'here we avenge our fallen comrades'. a priest gave everybody general absolution and the terrified civilians prepared for death - but the firing died away and the black and tans advanced into the crowd with weapons at the ready.
(pp. 145, 146) although gleeson refers now to the black and tans and occasionally to the police, the chapter's called 'massacre by the black and tans', who were of course members of the ric.

from 'red sunday in dublin', the times, 22 november 1920:
fighting between troops and a crowd at a football match at croke park resulted in ten deaths and between 50 and 60 persons were wounded. ... a serious affair occurred in the afternoon. crown forces drove to croke park, where a crowd of about 15,000 people had collected to witness a gaelic football match. many of them had come in from the country. it is alleged that when the crown forces entered the field they were fired at by scouts, who were posted all over the field. they returned the fire, the people stampeded, and one woman was crushed to death at the gates. it is reported that twelve persons in all were killed and over 100 wounded. afterwards over 30 revolvers were found on the field.
(p. 12)

from 'croke park panic - eyewitnesses' stories of the shooting - an official explanation', the times, 23 november 1920:
eyewitnesses spoke with horror of the screaming of the women and children of whom there were many present at the match. according to several accounts the soldiers took no part in the shooting, but stood by in support of the auxiliaries. a cordon of military, it is said, had been thrown round the ground.
(p. 12)

it seems that not all eyewitness accounts support your version of events, and, as i said above, there does seem to be some confusion about what happened.
 
there's a book on em in the library at uni, i'm gonna pick that up when i have time

basically most of them were quite naive catholics outraged at the stories of clerical persecution in spain, and whod been wound up by the preists , the bishops and the bourgouisie . Their footsoldiers lack of any fascist ideology was evident when one of them , from Lurgan , bumped into a group of Irish republican volunteers as both were travelling through france to join their respective sides and decided he liked their company so much he switched sides before he got there .

In my opinion they were seriously out of their depth and woefully naieve. Very few of them had ever fired a shot in anger , they had often minimal training but yet found themselves thrust into the hairiest parts of the front line as part of Francos elite division of fascist stormtroopers. That was largely due to ODuffys self aggrandisement of the military title of "General" , which he'd acquired in the free state army . Francos people had assumed that anyone with a generals title had attended an elite military academy somewhere. Not earned it in a hedge outside cavan.

Wasnt long before it went tits up for them . Although they were on the fascist side in my opinion very few of them could actually be described as fascists themselves, although some certainly were or at least had pretensions in that direction . But most would have been clueless and motivated by a sense of religious duty coupled with boredom at home.
 
Back
Top Bottom