Oneeyedjarvis
New Member
Being honest is not a good start if you plan to be wealthy.
All billionaires are evil?
Not so sure - I view the likes of Bezos in different light to someone like Elon Musk.
I don't know about you but I fully support musk's spaceflight ambitions, the sooner he's launched towards the sun or towards alpha centauri the betterSo, since Bezos recently withdrew his US staff's health benefits, should Musk consider that some kind of "dirty" challenge?
So, since Bezos recently withdrew his US staff's health benefits, should Musk consider that some kind of "dirty" challenge?
I don't know about you but I fully support musk's spaceflight ambitions, the sooner he's launched towards the sun or towards alpha centauri the better
Do you have a link for that?
This quote from the article is fucking hystericalSending Musk to the Sun would be a waste of expensive delta-V. I say we instead induct him into an ocean floor exploration program, issue him with a pair of osmium-lined boots, and let gravity do most of the work.
Whole Foods cuts health benefits for nearly 2,000 part-time workers
"I am in shock. I've worked here 15 years. This is why I keep the job—because of my benefits."www.salon.com
Whole Foods cuts health benefits for nearly 2,000 part-time workers
"I am in shock. I've worked here 15 years. This is why I keep the job—because of my benefits."www.salon.com
worth is $13 billion, which he achieved on July 20, 2020. He made $542 million per hour, $9.0 million per minute, and $150,463 per second that day.
Sending Musk to the Sun would be a waste of expensive delta-V. I say we instead induct him into an ocean floor exploration program, issue him with a pair of osmium-lined boots, and let gravity do most of the work.
Twelve US Billionaires Have a Combined $1 Trillion
A Disturbing Milestone in the Concentration of U.S. Wealth
August 17, 2020
But, Jeff Bezos provides employment for thousands of people and enables millions of people to buy lots of stuff without leaving home. He even keeps an eye on what you say as well as spend pennies on in order to sell you even more stuff, no pointless advertising.
Is that comparison valid ? Surely wealth (in terms of $ assets that exist) is not comparable with GDP, which is the amount of money annually generated by an economy. Surely a more valid comparison would be with the income enjoyed by these rich people. Otherwise it's like comparing the value of my house with your annual wages.To put this into perspective, global GDP is 80 trillion USD, so those 12 people own 1.2% of global GDP. That is roughly equal to the entire economy of Indonesia, a middle income country of 270 million people.
Apple have recently passed the 2 trillion valuation. Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google) and Apple together are worth the nearly 6 trillion - making them equal to 7% of global economic output, close to 20% of Europe's entire GDP, and about equal to the combined GDPs of the entire continents of Africa and South America, and about double the entire Indian economy. If the 4 companies together formed a country, they would be the third largest economy in the world, and not far off half the size of the entire Chinese economy.
When you are dealing with levels of wealth comparable not to entire countries but to entire continents, and these continent sized companies do not contribute taxation, then you have a problem.
But there is another point worth bearing in mind: much of this new wealth has been created because of the existence and activities of the companies involved. For instance, in the last few months, I've benefited to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds from the trebling in the value of Tesla. This money that did not exist before has also flowed to Musk, and to many pension and investment funds, with their millions of customers.
Of course it's stolen from everyone else. Wealth is derived from labour.This is fresh, new wealth, and one thing is clear: it has not been stolen from anybody else - it has come into existence. In the absence of Tesla (or Amazon, Apple, Google, etc.), the billionaires in question would not exist, but global net assets would also be a few trillion smaller.
This is economically illiterateBut there is another point worth bearing in mind: much of this new wealth has been created because of the existence and activities of the companies involved. For instance, in the last few months, I've benefited to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds from the trebling in the value of Tesla. This money that did not exist before has also flowed to Musk, and to many pension and investment funds, with their millions of customers. This is fresh, new wealth, and one thing is clear: it has not been stolen from anybody else - it has come into existence. In the absence of Tesla (or Amazon, Apple, Google, etc.), the billionaires in question would not exist, but global net assets would also be a few trillion smaller.
All of the World’s Wealth in One Visualization
There is $360.6 trillion of wealth globally. This graphic shows how it breaks down by country, to show who owns all of the world's wealth.www.visualcapitalist.com
More worringly, who buys it all.
Is that comparison valid ? Surely wealth (in terms of $ assets that exist) is not comparable with GDP, which is the amount of money annually generated by an economy. Surely a more valid comparison would be with the income enjoyed by these rich people. Otherwise it's like comparing the value of my house with your annual wages.
Attempts are made to calculate the worth of countries in terms of assets (natural, intellectual, real estate, financial, etc.) but it's not an easy task. However Credit Suisse calculates Global wealth to be $361 Trillion, which is rather larger that Global GDP of $80 Trillion, putting the 12 rich guys' ownership share of planet Earth at 0.3%.
Still seems like quite a lot.
But there is another point worth bearing in mind: much of this new wealth has been created because of the existence and activities of the companies involved. For instance, in the last few months, I've benefited to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds from the trebling in the value of Tesla. This money that did not exist before has also flowed to Musk, and to many pension and investment funds, with their millions of customers. This is fresh, new wealth, and one thing is clear: it has not been stolen from anybody else - it has come into existence. In the absence of Tesla (or Amazon, Apple, Google, etc.), the billionaires in question would not exist, but global net assets would also be a few trillion smaller.
All of the World’s Wealth in One Visualization
There is $360.6 trillion of wealth globally. This graphic shows how it breaks down by country, to show who owns all of the world's wealth.www.visualcapitalist.com
If you bought shares in Amazon you'd be exploiting your exploitationThat’s interesting.
So, if I bought shares in Amazon then technically Bezos now works for me?
If you bought shares in Amazon you'd be exploiting your exploitation
can't see how you'd be ethically worse off than you are alreadyOr gaining from my exploitation?
Ethically poor tho.
can't see how you'd be ethically worse off than you are already
oh i'm not talking about the ethics of share ownership now, i'm talking about the abysmal ethics you display here on a daily basis with your shitty rw links. you are already ethically bankrupt.Right on bro
Amazon hasn't created any new wealth, they've consolidated sales that would have been made by someone else so that they are effectively via them, True total consumer spending has gone up over Amazon's existence but population and disposable income growth generally have driven that not any action by Bezos.Is that comparison valid ? Surely wealth (in terms of $ assets that exist) is not comparable with GDP, which is the amount of money annually generated by an economy. Surely a more valid comparison would be with the income enjoyed by these rich people. Otherwise it's like comparing the value of my house with your annual wages.
Attempts are made to calculate the worth of countries in terms of assets (natural, intellectual, real estate, financial, etc.) but it's not an easy task. However Credit Suisse calculates Global wealth to be $361 Trillion, which is rather larger that Global GDP of $80 Trillion, putting the 12 rich guys' ownership share of planet Earth at 0.3%.
Still seems like quite a lot.
But there is another point worth bearing in mind: much of this new wealth has been created because of the existence and activities of the companies involved. For instance, in the last few months, I've benefited to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds from the trebling in the value of Tesla. This money that did not exist before has also flowed to Musk, and to many pension and investment funds, with their millions of customers. This is fresh, new wealth, and one thing is clear: it has not been stolen from anybody else - it has come into existence. In the absence of Tesla (or Amazon, Apple, Google, etc.), the billionaires in question would not exist, but global net assets would also be a few trillion smaller.
All of the World’s Wealth in One Visualization
There is $360.6 trillion of wealth globally. This graphic shows how it breaks down by country, to show who owns all of the world's wealth.www.visualcapitalist.com
oh i'm not talking about the ethics of share ownership now, i'm talking about the abysmal ethics you display here on a daily basis with your shitty rw links. you are already ethically bankrupt.
i am on topic. you introduced the topic of ethics, which you seem unhappy now to discuss. i wonder why. everyone knows the only way is ethics. everyone except you.Yawn.
Do you mind keeping on topic and refraining from your bore inducing personal attacks?