George & Bill
semiotically superfluous
A study was done looking into the Parliament Square scheme to try to determine the pcu (passenger car unit - basically a measure of effect on the network) value for bicycles. Traditionally a value pof 0.25 is used as a global value, but obviously bikes take up different amounts of space depending where they are (e.g. they take up less space on the main body of a road than at a junction..) and how many bikes there are &c..
Using the results of the Parliament Square study (and comparing to traditional 0.25 PCU values), models were run for investigating the possibility of increasing cycle levels in London to meet Boris' vision of a 4-fold increase.
As most new cycle trips in Central London would be coming from public transport rather than from cars, the net effect would be increase demand on the network by about 10% (i.e 1 bus = 3 pcus. 1 bus carries 25 people. If 5 left the bus to become cyclists, then 5/25 * 3 pcus are removed, but 5 * 0.25 pcus are added).
The net effect is that speeds in central London would fall by around 6% in equilibrium.
A 6% fall in speeds in central london is equivalent to.... <starts computer....>
Unless there's more to it, this method of analysis is so crude as to be near-useless, because it only operates on the level of the simple amount of space taken up by any given vehicle, rather than looking at how vehicles of widely varying sizes differ in the way they move within the flow of traffic. That is to say, bikes don't move around in rigid car-shaped groups of four, but instead filter flexibly through (or are filtered past, depending on the speed of the traffic). A large part - probably the majority- of the time, they occupy spaces within the flow of traffic that would otherwise be empty, and at these times their effect on congestion is almost nil.