platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
At a press conference on Thursday afternoon, Austria’s Green ‘superminister’ Leonore Gewessler unveiled the new nationwide Klimaticket — “climate ticket”, heavily subsidised by federal taxes, to boost the use of public transport in Austria.
An annual Klimaticket, Gewessler said, will cost €1,095, and will cover rail, metro and bus networks in cities and everywhere between them, whether privately or publicly operated.
For Gewessler and Austria’s Greens, who entered into a coalition with the mainstream conservative People’s Party of chancellor Sebastian Kurz in January 2020, the gambit is also a bold bet to try to reassert their environmental agenda after months of drift.
Is this a good idea? Should someone living in Newton Aycliffe who might currently pay £3 a day to travel to work and back by bus, fund through their taxes a big subsidy for middde-class southerners to go swanning into London on the cheap? Surely such a policy benefits those who live in wealthy places with lots of public transport options to avail themselves of?
If it was instead funded by road pricing or similar it might be equitable, provided that the road pricing took account of available public transport options, but I can't see a case of funding this through general taxation.
An annual Klimaticket, Gewessler said, will cost €1,095, and will cover rail, metro and bus networks in cities and everywhere between them, whether privately or publicly operated.
For Gewessler and Austria’s Greens, who entered into a coalition with the mainstream conservative People’s Party of chancellor Sebastian Kurz in January 2020, the gambit is also a bold bet to try to reassert their environmental agenda after months of drift.
Green transition: Austrians offered all nationwide public transport for €3 a day
The state-subsidised ‘Klimaticket’ was unveiled by Green party minister Leonore Gewessler
www.ft.com
Is this a good idea? Should someone living in Newton Aycliffe who might currently pay £3 a day to travel to work and back by bus, fund through their taxes a big subsidy for middde-class southerners to go swanning into London on the cheap? Surely such a policy benefits those who live in wealthy places with lots of public transport options to avail themselves of?
If it was instead funded by road pricing or similar it might be equitable, provided that the road pricing took account of available public transport options, but I can't see a case of funding this through general taxation.