Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Apple iPhone and related items (cont.)

Or, alternatively, it's actually harder work (more CPU cycles) because it needs interpolation, rather than straight pixel mapping. It can be spun either way.
Was the video interpolated to full screen?

Either way it seems a bit odd not to test the phone with a video the same size as the screen's resolution, no?
 
Was the video interpolated to full screen?

Either way it seems a bit odd not to test the phone with a video the same size as the screen's resolution, no?

I think you're on a fishing trip, so do your own justification as to whether it's a fair test, an unfair test (in either direction), whether it was a deliberate fix etc etc.

(Personally I doubt it would change the numbers, but you feel you're onto something here, so run with it).
 
I'm assuming that the iPhone has a hardware H.264 decoder because its very CPU intensive and I doubt that the ARM11 CPU would be up to it on its own. Either way something is going to be running full tilt to decode a H.264 stream. That has battery life implications.
 
Or, alternatively, it's actually harder work (more CPU cycles) because it needs interpolation, rather than straight pixel mapping. It can be spun either way.

Ideally you'd test with a range of videos... But then I'd look at at range of different results from different websites. rather than relying on one.

IMO, Endgaget isn't exactly the most scientifically rigorous website when it comes it testing. But then what do you expect from a blogging site that is mostly recycled press releases...? :confused: :D
 
I've just started having a look at what's new in 2.0. There's quite a few subtle little improvements, including...

... screen grabs! Hold 'Home', then press the power button... They go into the photo library. I then sent it straight to flickr. :)

2677621933_b13c0edfdb_o.jpg
 
Monkey Ball... it uses the accelerometer, so you tilt to control the character. Not sure I like this particular game, but it shows some potential as a gaming platform...

2677669429_ab45f79c2f.jpg
 
Prettier version of Shazam (the core functionality - listening to and identifying tunes - is available on any phone).

2677680301_7be86333e3_o.jpg
 
Does that come with a microscope?!!

Its a shame that most bulletin boards aren't designed with the iPhone in mind.

The"
lastpost.gif
" on Urban is easy to select with a mouse.

With a big fat finger you need to zoom in on it first else you end up selecting something else nearby 8 times out of 10.
 
those buttons at the bottom look a bit ugly for an Apple design, no?

They're fairly minimalist! But I like that. It doesn't distract from the content you want to read.

(Conversely, I really hate MS approach to base UI elements cos' there's always bloody branding on the screen - if only in the Start button - and, by default, garish colours too.)
 
Its a shame that most bulletin boards aren't designed with the iPhone in mind.

The"
lastpost.gif
" on Urban is easy to select with a mouse.

With a big fat finger you need to zoom in on it first else you end up selecting something else nearby 8 times out of 10.

I can just about hit it unzoomed, about 80% of the time. Annoying when I miss though, cos' then it's a rather dull back-reload job. Second attempt, I'll always zoom. :rolleyes: :)
 
Its a shame that most bulletin boards aren't designed with the iPhone in mind.
Why should 'most boards' be designed for the truly microscopic percentage of iPhone users?

You can always use the stripped down skin option which works for the vast majority of mobile users.
 
Why should 'most boards' be designed for the truly microscopic percentage of iPhone users?

You can always use the stripped down skin option which works for the vast majority of mobile users.

Didn't say they should.

Just that as a iPhone user its a shame they aren't.

According to this article:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7508842.stm

maybe one day they will be, when the mouse is dead and pointy pointy fingers is the norm.

(ALthough i suspect FPS games will keep the mouse alive)
 
OMG... Remote is bloody brilliant! (All iPod functionality, exact same UI, but controlling iTunes on your computer... works a treat!)

Admittedly I'm normally sat in front of the PC when I've got music on, but it's very impressive.
 
OMG... Remote is bloody brilliant! (All iPod functionality, exact same UI, but controlling iTunes on your computer... works a treat!)

Admittedly I'm normally sat in front of the PC when I've got music on, but it's very impressive.

I love Remote. I have my computer set up through my telly. So controlling iTunes from the sofa with an easy interface is a joy.

Also as it's wireless and not infrared no line of sight needed. Scare your friends by starting scary music in the room they are in whilst you are upstairs :D

Just wish I had wireless speakers in my bedroom connected to the computer downstairs now :(
 
(I'll stop soon I promise ;) )

Now this is nice. Location aware Google search client:

2678670448_c0406f7a75_o.jpg



So then you tap the "near me" option, and (of course), you are straight into...

2677853571_48e400e07f_o.jpg
 
Me too tbh. The author has forgotten business use for starters. Our lot begrudge paying for mice let alone fancy devices.

Tell your employer you've got RSI, and you'll have a "fancy device" pretty fast. Ergonmically, mice are terrible...! IMO, trackballs are much better if you're using a pointing device 8 hours a day...
 
(I'll stop soon I promise ;) )

Now this is nice. Location aware Google search client:
But just about all users of Google Maps can do that already, no? What's the difference?

The best location services gizmo I saw was on the Treo 500 on Vodafone where you could get updated "what's on" listings of gigs/restaurants/cinemas etc closest to you.
 
But just about all users of Google Maps can do that already, no? What's the difference?

Because its all in one app with more sophisticated searching, rather than switching between a browser and the Google Maps App...?
 
Yeah, not quite sure how that's an improvement on the existing maps app, which has business search already built in? :confused:
 
Because its all in one app with more sophisticated searching, rather than switching between a browser and the Google Maps App...?
Doesn't look particularly more "sophisticated" on what's already available on other platforms to me. Either way you end up in Google Maps, so what's the difference?

The Vodafone app, however, was far more impressive.
 
Back
Top Bottom