iplayer in bed sounds pretty good really
I heard from another iPhone-owning urbanite tonight that the battery life was shocking too.
There's not much point having a cool looking phone if it doesn't last the day really.
The battery needs charging on mine at the end of each day after about 20 minutes of playing music and 2 minutes of calling.
I'm massively disappointed.
That sounds like a faulty unit to me.
That sounds like a faulty unit to me.
I think I might have voided the Apple warranty by having it unlocked from AT&T. I've been using a t-mobile sim since the day I bought it. I'd look like an absolute moron if I were to walk into an Apple store and be told I had voided my warranty after a week of ownership
I guess I'll have to make do.
Bought one - having a play.
One annoyance I have found is that, when I plug it into docking stations it tells me the accessory isn't supported and refuses to charge while it is in the dock - although it does play. This is the case on: Denon S52, a griffin FM transmitter and a JBL sound dock
have you tried putting it in flight mode?
Agree it's nice. It's. Faster than contacts itself (I have a couple of thousand), but it still only searches names and not notes or numbersThe new google ap is quite nice.
Seaches contacts and the web.
The new google ap is quite nice.
Seaches contacts and the web.
I see that the 8Gb model is now readily available, the initial stock shortage was somewhat manufactured by the looks of things. No such thing as bad publicity, something O2 seem to have exploited to the max.
When the 16Gb version comes into stock, i'll get one.
If it's more than the 3 they got on launch day then the proof is conclusive.
Oh I dont know, if they didnt have the firmware ready till very shortly before launch, it would have caused some supply issues. But yeah, artificial scarcity does seem to be a marketing technique these days.
Meanwhile fresh rumors about Steve Jobs health have not helped Apple's share price:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jul/22/stevejobs.apple
You've never heard of the marketing process of artificially restricting supply to create demand?I'm still trying to work out this one. By stifling shipments you sell more...?
http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/04/19/we-want-a-wii-still/2. Retailers are benefiting in extra store traffic, as people come to check to see if they have it available. So, even if they lose potential sales of this device, they probably make up much more in sales to people who are in the store looking for one. Perhaps the retailers are paying Nintendo not to ship them to the US?
You've never heard of the marketing process of artificially restricting supply to create demand?
Apple have a web page that shows the status of shipments
And it also explained a reason why a manufacturer/retailer might artificially restrict supply, a concept you seemed unable to grasp earlier.That's a link to a blog which is trying determine the reason for Nintendo not being able to satisfy demand.
And it also explained a reason why a manufacturer/retailer might artificially restrict supply, a concept you seemed unable to grasp earlier.
I'm not saying that Apple/o2 are necessarily guilty of this, btw.