More like a PR mistake that's now being hastily airbrushed.as a followup, according to the NYT Steve Jobs has said it was a mistake and going to be corrected -
Until [Apple] can and does commit to a public, transparent, clear, and logical policy describing a reasoned approach to censorship of apps based upon content, SJ's statement is meaningless.
elbows said:Those photos dont exactly show the kind of curvy hardware we have come to expect from Apple.
More like a PR mistake that's now being hastily airbrushed.
Good user comment in that article:
Neither of us will know what really happened but that's my take on it. I'm pretty sure that if he hadn't been famous and attracted so much press, his app would still be residing in the 'banned and we don't give a fuck' department - just like loads of other apps by lesser authors booted out for vague reasons.What would it look like if it was some other sort of mistake?
The app still ridicules public figures as far as I can see, so what else has changed?According to a Dec. 21 e-mail reprinted by Neiman, Apple rejected his app because it “contains content that ridicules public figures and is in violation of Section 3.3.14 from the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement which states: Applications may be rejected if they contain content or materials of any kind (text, graphics, images, photographs, sounds, etc.) that in Apple’s reasonable judgment may be found objectionable, for example, materials that may be considered obscene, pornographic, or defamatory.”
I held off posting about this earlier, as it all looked too circumstantial or fake, but it really does look like an apple engineer forgot to pick up their 4G iphone
http://gizmodo.com/5520164/this-is-apples-next-iphone - loads of pics and analysis (hi res screen, front camera, plastic back)
Unless it's an exceptionally detailed hoax, it looks real - I'm a bit sceptical about this "left it in a bar" thing though. Apple engineers are allowed to take high security products out of the lab, and not only that, to bars, now?
It looks more like some of the recent Android handsets, and those round buttons on the side keep reminding me of my old Sony Ericsson T610!I like the new look myself. All-over curves are so 00's (or 90's even!)
Ah that was a marvellous bit of design I only just dumped mine
There's always that likelihood because this whole 'left in a bar' story really, really does sound unlikely.I'm starting to think Apple leaked this themselves. Today is the same day that pre orders start for the droid incredible from htc.
There's always that likelihood because this whole 'left in a bar' story really, really does sound unlikely.
But it's never been just about the specs with the iPhone, which traditionally always lags behind the current high end features found elsewhere. It's the software and OS that matters, and that's been disabled.absolutely. this lets all their competitors get a 2 month lead on the specs of the new model. they keep that stuff secret for a reason.
absolutely. this lets all their competitors get a 2 month lead on the specs of the new model. they keep that stuff secret for a reason.
If Apple succeeds in popularising video calls (and if anyone can do it, it'll be them), the networks will just turn into one almighty facepalm as bandwidth vanishes quicker than a bikini app from the AppStore.I have to say I do really like that look. They can't boot it, so we still don't know what extra it can do apart from 3g video calls. I'd rather they hadn't of bothered with that. Has anyone seen a 3G video call, what a load of pants they are.
If Apple succeeds in popularising video calls (and if anyone can do it, it'll be them), the networks will just turn into one almighty facepalm as bandwidth vanishes quicker than a bikini app from the AppStore.