Another Russian spy hit?

[Magnus McGinty]

Oh, it's Israel. Right.

Oh come on; who else?

 

[phillm]

Oh come on; who else?

as said the 'posh' couple on Gogglebox

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/...agent-russia-putin-mossad-giles-mary-1.460851

 

[squirrelp]

squirrelp Which part of 'no other plausible explanation' don't you understand? Oh wait, silly me black is the new white.

I understand it perfectly - it means 'we've actually got nothing but we can't think why anyone else would do it'

(unless they are framing the Russians of course)

 

[Spymaster]

The French are framing the Russians

 

[phillm]

The French are framing the Russians

Israel is not yet in the finger pointing game.

Condemning attack on Russian double agent, Israel avoids vexing Kremlin

 

[squirrelp]

The French are framing the Russians

No.

either 1) the Russians did it
2) It's a 'conspiracy'

Do you need actual evidence in order to claim "the only plausible explanation (is that the Russians did it)"?

 

[Magnus McGinty]

No.

either 1) the Russians did it
2) It's a 'conspiracy'

Do you need actual evidence in order to claim "the only plausible explanation (is that the Russians did it)"?

You apparently don’t to claim it’s a conspiracy.

 

[Spymaster]

No.

either 1) the Russians did it
2) It's a conspiracy

Do you need actual evidence in order to claim "the only plausible explanation (is that the Russians did it)"?

You've been done hook, line, and sinker, on absolutely every element of this and that idiot Murray has been blown to bits. You're making a massive arse of yourself.

 

[T & P]

Salisbury is under a flight path. Has anyone checked for reports of chemtrails on the day? Just saying...

 

[squirrelp]

You've been done hook, line, and sinker, on absolutely every element of this and that idiot Murray has been blown to bits. You're making a massive arse of yourself.

I don't think so. Murray comprehensively took apart the chemist quoted earlier, Clyde Davies, you can read the full exchange on Craig's blog here.

Bothered By Midgies - Craig Murray

from RT:

Several MPs have retweeted claims that scientists at the British lab investigating the poisoning of ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter are actually struggling to identify the source of the nerve agent used.
Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan turned blogger, wrote on his website that scientists at Porton Down, the center responsible for identifying the nerve agent allegedly used in the attack against the Skripals, have failed to find evidence of Russian “culpability.” He said a “well-placed” source in the Foreign Office told him.

Murray added scientists had been “resentful” over the pressure put on them to prove the military-grade nerve agent is of Russian manufacture. The blogger’s comments and concerns were retweeted by Labour MP Chris Williamson, a frequent guest on RT, and the Scottish National Party’s Douglas Chapman.

MPs retweet claim that Porton Down scientists can’t identify nerve agent as Russian

 

[phillm]

Salisbury is under a flight path. Has anyone checked for reports of chemtrails on the day? Just saying...

Was also the home of notorious sailing paedo pm Edward Teeth - just saying....

 

[squirrelp]

This was particularly hilarious from the Davies = Murray spat: Davies confessing he had no proof whatsoever

 

[Supine]

Salisbury is under a flight path. Has anyone checked for reports of chemtrails on the day? Just saying...

and and

 

[Magnus McGinty]

It was the Jews again. Why do they keep getting away with it?

 

[2hats]

Anyone know what David Icke has to say about all this?

 

[agricola]

Salisbury is under a flight path. Has anyone checked for reports of chemtrails on the day? Just saying...

Its also the name of a type of steak in the Fallout game series, which also features - amongst other parallels with this case - a robot with an East London "Cockney" accident. Oddly enough, before the Russian crisis blew up with Theresa May's ultimatum to the Russians, the Guardian had an article reporting that the original voice of HAL in 2001 was that of a Cockney.

Coincidence?

 

[Spymaster]

This was particularly hilarious from the Davies = Murray spat: Davies confessing he had no proof whatsoever

He's absolutely right.

You should be banned from this thread now. You've had your fun but it's become completely ridiculous and disruptive.

 

[squirrelp]

I note you made no response to the question I posed in post #725, 'Spymaster'.

 

[Spymaster]

I note you made no response to the question I posed in post #725, 'Spymaster'.

There's no point in engaging with you. I've tried to do so politely and you've been hung drawn and quartered. You're the only person who doesn't think so, so now I'm just going to take the piss.

 

[squirrelp]

There's no point in engaging with you. I've tried to do so politely and you've been hung drawn and quartered. You're the only person who doesn't think so, so now I'm just going to take the piss.

I suggest you are not answering because you have realised that the phrase "the only plausible explanation' is diplomatic code for 'let's exclude conspiracy theory' and not 'evidence has positively identified Russian involvement' which everyone has been extremely careful to imply but not actually say.

 

[Spymaster]

I suggest you are not answering because you have realised that the phrase "the only plausible explanation' really just means 'let's exclude conspiracy theory' and not 'evidence has positively identified Russian involvement' which everyone has been extremely careful to imply but not actually say.

I suggest you're talking bollocks and that it means exactly what it says.

 

[squirrelp]

So you would consider a conspiracy theory 'plausible' in the first instance?

 

[Spymaster]

They've been told about the evidence and have reached the conclusion that the only plausible explanation is that Russia did it. Now fuck off.

 

[squirrelp]

They've been told about the evidence and have reached the conclusion that the only plausible explanation is that Russia did it. Now fuck off.

If they had seen evidence linking the attack to Russia they would have said so unequivocally. What their statement means is "we are falling into line and will try to pretend that we have been provided with the evidence requested without actually saying so"

if we had evidence linking the attack to Russia, we'd have (also) said so unequivocally.

 

[Spymaster]

Fuck off.

 

[squirrelp]

This has already unravelled: the question is at what point that will be officially admitted.

 

[not-bono-ever]

you are dancing in the shadows now.

 

[krtek a houby]

If they had seen evidence linking the attack to Russia they would have said so unequivocally. What their statement means is "we are falling into line and will try to pretend that we have been provided with the evidence requested without actually saying so"

if we had evidence linking the attack to Russia, we'd have (also) said so unequivocally.

Do you think every detail of the attack is going to be released? I'm imagining there's concerns over something called national security etc...

 

[stuff_it]

Has anyone suggested that the daughter was in fact the target of the hit for her own activities, dad included because they knew she was asking him for advice due to his previous job?

 

[stuff_it]

Ah, so they have...

https://nypost.com/2018/03/16/spys-daughter-was-the-real-target-in-poisoning-relative/